Search Climate Insights Directory

The report argues that 'nature-based solutions' and carbon offsetting schemes promoted by governments and over 1,500 large companies are 'false climate solutions' that risk causing mass land grabbing and dispossession. It highlights that the land requirements for corporate net-zero promises are immense, citing examples from Nestlé and Shell. The document further asserts that these mechanisms benefit agribusiness, fossil fuel, and tech companies while forcing small-scale farmers into intensive practices, ultimately threatening to co-opt and weaken agroecology, which is presented as the genuine transformative alternative for food production and climate cooling.

The report argues that 'nature-based solutions' and carbon offsetting used by corporations to achieve 'net zero' goals lead to land grabbing and the dispossession of indigenous and rural peoples. It highlights that the massive land requirements for these schemes—such as those proposed by Nestlé and Shell—threaten food sovereignty and risk co-opting agroecology, which the report presents as the only truly transformative way to produce food while cooling the planet.

The guide provides alphabetical definitions of key WTO terms, including the agreements resulting from the Uruguay Round, the functions of WTO governing bodies, and specific legal clauses related to trade, environment, and intellectual property.

The fact sheet criticizes the adoption of "nature-based solutions" by over 1,500 companies, asserting that these strategies allow firms to maintain polluting business models while claiming "net zero" targets. It highlights Shell and Nestlé as examples of companies using carbon offsets to mask continued emissions and environmental damage. The document advocates for "real zero emissions" through the cessation of fossil fuel extraction and the support of agroecology and community-led forest management led by indigenous peoples and local communities.

The fact sheet critiques the adoption of 'nature based solutions' (NBS) by over 1,500 corporations, asserting that these strategies allow companies to maintain fossil fuel use and industrial growth under the guise of 'net zero' commitments. It highlights Shell's plan to plant trees on an area nearly the size of Brazil and Nestlé's reliance on offsetting to mask projected growth in animal product sourcing. The document contrasts these corporate approaches with community-led solutions like agroecology and community forest management, which it describes as essential for climate justice and food sovereignty.

The fact sheet critiques the use of 'nature-based solutions' by major corporations to achieve 'net zero' targets without abandoning fossil fuels or changing core business models. It highlights Shell's plan to plant forests the size of Brazil and Nestlé's reliance on offsets despite its contribution to deforestation. The document contrasts these corporate strategies with 'real solutions' led by Indigenous peoples and local communities, such as agroecology and community forest management, which prioritize ecological governance over the commodification of carbon.

The report criticizes the EU's reliance on agrofuels to meet renewable energy targets in transport, asserting that these fuels often cause more environmental damage than fossil fuels. It highlights the role of Indirect Land-Use Change (ILUC) in increasing greenhouse gas emissions and biodiversity loss, while also noting the negative impact of biofuel production on global food prices and water consumption. The document calls for a shift toward a transport strategy based on energy efficiency and renewable electricity, and the implementation of stricter sustainability criteria that account for ILUC.

The document details a rise in political violence in Germany, noting 3,691 attacks against politically active individuals in 2023. It analyzes how disinformation narratives targeting political leaders, civic institutions, and immigrants are leveraged by domestic actors (such as the AfD and BSW) and foreign actors (primarily Russia via RT Deutsch and Pravda-DE) to destabilize the democratic system. The report highlights the role of 'mirror websites' and VPNs in bypassing sanctions on Russian media and notes that over 75% of adversarial content from analyzed domains relates to the Russia-Ukraine conflict.

The guide outlines three primary strategies for engaging Chinese companies in the Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative (EITI): demonstrating the financial and risk-reduction benefits of compliance, localizing communications and materials into the Chinese language, and utilizing political dialogue with the Chinese government to secure official recognition. It emphasizes that Chinese firms, including state-owned enterprises, are increasingly responsive to global market dynamics and international regulatory pressures, such as disclosure rules from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the European Commission. The author suggests that EITI could mirror the successful entry strategy of the UN Global Compact in China by leveraging bilateral relationships and existing corporate social responsibility (CSR) programs.

The Cerrejón coal mine in Colombia, owned by BHP, Anglo-American, and Glencore, is accused of severe human rights and environmental violations, including forced evictions, water contamination, and health crises. Global Witness argues that the mine's owners and their European links demonstrate a systemic lack of corporate accountability, advocating for new EU legislation to make companies liable for harms caused in their global supply chains.

The report alleges that ADNOC, led by COP28 President Sultan Al-Jaber, pursued nearly $100 billion in fossil fuel deals during the UAE's year as host, contradicting public claims that the summit was not used for commercial gain. It details specific targets in countries like Brazil, Azerbaijan, and China, and argues that the COP28 final text's ambiguous language on 'transitioning away' from fossil fuels allows ADNOC to expand production while appearing compliant with climate goals.

A Global Witness investigation found that up to 20 million barrels of Russian ESPO crude, valued at $1.5 billion, were likely sold above the G7 price cap of $60 per barrel between December 2022 and January 2023. The report highlights the involvement of British and European shipping, insurance, and trading firms, while noting a severe lack of enforcement and attestation collection by authorities in Switzerland, Greece, and the UK.

A Global Witness and Public Eye investigation reveals that the world's top three commodity traders—Vitol, Glencore, and Trafigura—engaged middlemen linked to Brazil's 'Car Wash' corruption scandal. The report details how these intermediaries, including the 'Deacon of Bribes' and professional money-launderers, allegedly facilitated bribery schemes and insider information trades to secure oil and fuel contracts with Petrobras. While the companies deny wrongdoing, the report highlights 'corruption red flags' and calls for investigations by authorities in the UK, US, and Switzerland.

The document examines how progressive taxation can address extreme poverty and economic inequality, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Africa. It evaluates several tax instruments, including Financial Transaction Taxes (FTTs), net wealth taxes, property taxes, and Resource Rent Taxes (RTT), detailing their potential to generate revenue for social protection and climate justice. Using South Africa as a case study, the brief provides specific revenue estimates for various progressive measures, such as a net wealth tax that could raise between R70 and R160 billion.

The document examines the tension between the WTO's multilateral Work Programme on Electronic Commerce and the plurilateral Joint Statement Initiative (JSI) on e-commerce. It highlights the conflict over the moratorium on customs duties for electronic transmissions, where some developing nations fear revenue loss while others advocate for a permanent ban on such duties. The analysis focuses on the upcoming MC14 in Yaoundé, Cameroon, where members must decide on the future of the moratorium and whether to incorporate the JSI's proposed e-commerce agreement into the WTO framework.

The document analyzes the deadlock in WTO agricultural negotiations regarding domestic support, public stockholding, and market access, while proposing three priority areas for Least Developed Countries (LDCs): reducing cotton subsidies, improving market access for cotton products, and securing exemptions from export restrictions.

The document analyzes the deadlock in WTO agricultural negotiations regarding domestic support, public food stocks, and market access. It argues that while global breakthroughs are unlikely, LDCs can focus on three achievable goals: reducing trade-distorting cotton subsidies, improving market access for cotton and its by-products, and securing exemptions from export restrictions on food and agricultural products. It also notes an emerging trend of informal dialogues within the WTO to link agricultural trade with sustainable development.

The document argues that Green Public Procurement (GPP) can be cost-effective by reducing energy use and avoiding significant health and environmental costs. While some high-ambition GPP requirements may increase costs by up to 20%, others reduce them, and overall costs are expected to fall as GPP drives market innovation and green industry development.

The communiqué calls for the elimination of fossil-fuel subsidies to help limit global temperature increases to below 2°C, noting that such subsidies encourage wasteful consumption and hinder renewable energy investment. It emphasizes that reform should be transparent, ambitious, and accompanied by targeted support for the poor, while referencing existing commitments from the G20 and APEC.

The document describes a comprehensive training package for Integrated Environmental Assessments (IEA), structured into two volumes. Volume 1 covers eight methodological modules ranging from design and data monitoring to scenario analysis and communication. Volume 2 provides a thematic module specifically focused on vulnerability and impact assessment for climate change adaptation. The manual is designed to be flexible and interactive, supported by a Community Platform for resource sharing and a database of trainers.