Search Climate Insights Directory

This report by Friends of the Earth International examines the consequences of shifting the management of natural resources from public to private control. It focuses on the privatization of water and biodiversity, highlighting how neoliberal policies promoted by international financial institutions (IFIs) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) often lead to increased costs for the poor, environmental degradation, and the appropriation of indigenous knowledge. Through 34 case studies, the document illustrates the negative outcomes of these policies and advocates for community-led management and the recognition of water as a human right.

The report argues that a free trade agreement (FTA) between the Southern African Customs Union (SACU) and Mercosur would offer limited static economic gains, as current trade flows would likely reinforce South Africa's existing comparative advantage in capital-intensive primary products. However, it highlights significant dynamic opportunities for industrial development through intra-industry specialisation, institutional collaboration on technology and small business policy, and the potential to discipline dominant upstream firms through increased competition. The author warns of risks in sensitive sectors, particularly motor vehicles and agriculture, where South Africa could become a 'periphery location' to Brazil's larger economy.

The report identifies several administrative and financial vulnerabilities within the IAI, including significant member country contribution arrears, inconsistent enforcement of reporting requirements for research grantees, and a lack of formalized procurement and labor procedures. KPMG recommends strengthening the approval flow for scientific and financial reports, standardizing grantee contracts, and updating the purchasing and employee manuals to mitigate legal and financial risks.

The report by Friends of the Earth International examines the intersection of human and environmental rights, detailing case studies of corporate and state abuses. It advocates for a framework of environmental justice that includes the right to sustainable livelihoods, clean environments, water, and food security, while emphasizing the need for transparency, collective rights, and legal redress for climate refugees and ecological debt.

The action list from the first day of the Eleventh Meeting of the IAI Conference of the Parties (CoP) on June 30, 2004, details the election of the Bureau, agenda modifications, and the accreditation of 16 member delegations.

The document is a participant list for the IAI Forum held in Buenos Aires, Argentina, on July 1, 2004. It identifies attendees from various academic, governmental, and international organizations, including the National Science Foundation, the Meteorological Service of Canada, and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), as well as the staff of the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI).

The Eleventh Meeting of the Conference of the Parties (CoP) of the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research established its leadership, approved its agenda and previous meeting report, verified the credentials of 16 member delegations, and requested new nomination rules for the Scientific Advisory Committee.

The document is a participant list for the 11th IAI Conference of the Parties (CoP) meeting held in Buenos Aires, Argentina, in 2004. It identifies representatives from various national governments, scientific institutions, and international organizations.

The Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) proposes an alternative budget for fiscal year 2004/2005 that reduces total requested funds by $28,303 compared to the previous year. A key change is the creation of a permanent Program Manager position, whose costs will be shared between the Basic Budget and the CRN II Program, transitioning to 100% Basic Budget funding by 2007/2008. The IAI warns that its operational sustainability is highly dependent on member countries paying their contributions on time, as cash flow analysis indicates that receiving less than 86% of committed funds would jeopardize the Executive Directorate's operations.

The 20th SAC meeting of the IAI, held in April 2004, reviewed the progress of SGP I, SGP II, and CRN I research programs. The committee discussed the synthesis of CRN I results, established evaluation criteria for the upcoming CRN II and SGP III calls for proposals, and defined the necessary areas of expertise for new SAC members. Additionally, the committee sought ways to increase member country engagement and explored potential partnerships with US organizations like NOAA for observation and monitoring systems.

The report details the evolution of the IAI, from its establishment by 11 countries in 1992 to its operational phase in Brazil. It outlines the institute's mission to build scientific capacity and collaborative research networks to understand global environmental changes in the Americas. The document tracks the progression of the IAI Science Agenda, the implementation of various funding mechanisms such as Start-up Grants, Initial Science Programs (ISP), and the Collaborative Research Network (CRN) program, and the results of these initiatives in terms of publications, student training, and policy-relevant findings.

The report details the first ten years of the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI), outlining its mission to understand global environmental changes in the Americas. It describes the evolution of the IAI's scientific agenda, the establishment of its organizational structure, and the implementation of various funding programs including the Initial Science Program (ISP), the Collaborative Research Network (CRN), and the Program to Expand Scientific Capacity in the Americas (PESCA). The document highlights the institute's focus on climate variability, biodiversity, land use, and human dimensions, while documenting the creation of the Data Information System (DIS) and the hosting of several Summer Institutes to foster interdisciplinary cooperation across member nations.

The report details the first ten years of the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI), outlining its mission to understand global environmental changes in the Americas. It describes the evolution of its scientific agenda from seven initial themes to four broad categories, the implementation of various grant programs (Initial Grants, Initial Scientific Program, and Cooperative Research Networks), and the establishment of its headquarters in Brazil. Key achievements include the funding of 14 Cooperative Research Networks (CRNs) with a US$10 million investment, the training of hundreds of scientists and students, and the creation of the IAI-DIS data system. The document also lists specific research projects focusing on climate variability, biodiversity, and human dimensions across North, Central, and South America.

The document examines Brazil's role in the FTAA negotiations, highlighting the tension between Brazil's desire for agricultural market access and the US's push for the inclusion of 'Singapore issues' such as investment and intellectual property. It details Brazil's efforts to protect sensitive industrial sectors and its strategic use of Mercosur to avoid isolation as the US pursues bilateral agreements with other Latin American nations. The analysis concludes that the FTAA is shifting toward a flexible 'ALCA-lite' framework with a limited built-in agenda.

The report assesses the capacity of developing countries in South America, South Asia, and Southern & Eastern Africa to comply with international trade standards. It argues that while regional cooperation in accreditation, early-warning systems, and awareness-raising can offset national institutional weaknesses, the WTO's TBT Agreement is often unrealistic for 'standards-takers' who lack the scientific and legal capacity to influence international standards or prove their inappropriateness. The report recommends integrating technical assistance needs into national development plans and establishing mediation mechanisms outside the formal WTO dispute process.

The report presents twelve reasons why large hydroelectric projects are incompatible with the goals of renewable energy initiatives. It contends that these projects fail to alleviate poverty, divert funding from cleaner decentralized technologies, and often suffer from underestimated costs and overestimated benefits. The text highlights severe social and environmental impacts, including the forced displacement of 40 to 80 million people and the emission of greenhouse gases from reservoirs. It further argues that large dams increase vulnerability to climate change, are inflexible and costly to build, and are not truly renewable due to sedimentation.

The document examines the proliferation of bilateral and regional investment treaties, highlighting how they limit the ability of host states to regulate for public health and the environment. It critiques the investor-to-state dispute settlement mechanism for its lack of transparency and the use of 'indirect expropriation' claims to challenge environmental laws. The author recommends that new governance principles for foreign direct investment in hazardous activities ensure public transparency in arbitration, public consultation on host government agreements, and a commitment by companies to abide by evolving environmental and health legislation.

The document presents case studies of biodiversity restoration by small farmers in Costa Rica, Paraguay, and Uruguay, contrasting these with the destructive impacts of industrial agriculture, genetically modified seeds, and international trade agreements.

The document details the activities of the WTO's Working Group on Trade, Debt and Finance (WGTDF) following the Doha Ministerial Declaration. It highlights a fundamental divide: developing countries argue for 'policy spaces', increased market access, and debt reduction mechanisms to combat financial instability, while developed countries emphasize pro-liberalisation domestic reforms and supply-capacity increases. The briefing also notes tensions regarding policy coherence between the WTO and Bretton Woods institutions, exemplified by a dispute over South Korea's financial sector bailouts.

The document examines the global trend of water privatization, highlighting how the World Bank and IMF pressure developing nations to privatize water services as a condition for loans. It details the dominance of French multinationals Suez and Vivendi, and the impact of trade agreements like GATS on water access. Through case studies from Bolivia, Malaysia, Indonesia, and other regions, it documents tariff increases, environmental degradation, and social resistance, while proposing community-based management and 'soft path' alternatives to corporate control.