Search Climate Insights Directory

The report identifies 'green shoots of recovery' in securitisation markets, particularly through increased residential mortgage backed securities (RMBS) in the UK and trade finance securitisations. While investor demand is returning, the report argues that supply is constrained by heavy government intervention (such as by the ECB and US federal agencies) and stringent new regulations like Basel III and Solvency II. The author suggests that the normalisation of these markets is vital for climate finance, as 95% of project finance globally comes from bank lending, and securitisation allows banks to recycle limited capital to fund renewable energy and energy efficiency projects.

The letter expresses concern that carbon offsets are undermining EU climate goals by stifling domestic emission reductions and supporting projects that lack environmental integrity. It specifically highlights the negative impacts of coal-fired power plants and large hydro projects in the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), as well as the lack of transparency in Track 1 Joint Implementation (JI).

The document analyzes the International Bar Association's Model Mining Development Agreement (MMDA 1.0), providing a template and narrative to ensure mining contracts promote sustainable development, transparency, and equitable resource distribution. It details key contractual areas including land tenure, royalties, taxation, and community obligations, while emphasizing the use of international standards like the IFC Performance Standards and EITI. Additionally, the report investigates the existence of similar model agreements for the oil and gas sector, concluding that no internationally accepted model currently exists despite the availability of various national form contracts.

The statement details the social, environmental, and human rights conflicts surrounding the Barro Blanco hydroelectric project in Panama. It highlights the resistance of the Ngäbe Bugle indigenous people, the failure of stakeholder consultations, and the ecological risks to the Tabasará River, while criticizing the project's approval under the UN's CDM offsetting scheme.

The WWF Sanlam Partnership (2012-2014) focused on protecting South Africa's strategic water source areas and promoting corporate water stewardship. Key achievements include mapping the 8% of land area that provides 50% of the country's surface water, launching the 'Journey of Water' public awareness campaign, and developing tools to help investors assess water risks for JSE-listed companies. The partnership also implemented operational water-saving measures at Sanlam, reducing consumption by 41% against a 2010 baseline, and collaborated on disaster risk reduction in the Eden District Municipality.

The Greens in the Bundestag and European Parliament call for a transition from a currency union to a comprehensive economic union to resolve the Eurocrisis. They argue that the Treaty of Lisbon and the 'new fiscal policy pact' are insufficient because they rely on intergovernmental cooperation rather than democratically legitimised EU institutions. The document proposes a 'Green Convention on the Future of the European Union' to debate treaty amendments, including the creation of a European Economic and Finance Minister, a European financial transaction tax, and a 'social progress clause' to protect workers' rights. The authors advocate for a 'Green New Deal' to ensure sustainable and socially equitable growth, alongside greater harmonisation of tax systems to prevent tax avoidance and dangerous competition.

The report analyzes how broad definitions of investor nationality in bilateral investment treaties (BITs) allow transnational companies to engage in 'treaty shopping'—the practice of acquiring a specific nationality to gain access to more favorable legal protections or international arbitration. It examines three primary nationality criteria: place of incorporation, head office, and control, noting that the incorporation criterion is particularly susceptible to the creation of 'mailbox' companies. The author distinguishes between pre-dispute treaty shopping, which arbitration tribunals generally tolerate as legal planning, and post-dispute restructuring, which is often rejected as an abuse of rights. To mitigate these risks, the report recommends that states adopt stricter, cumulative nationality criteria (such as combining incorporation with substantial business activity) and implement automatic 'denial of benefits' clauses.

The author analyzes the mechanism of populism in Europe, describing it as a process of creating fixed, exclusionary images of 'the other' to define a 'good' people against a 'bad' elite and 'backward' minorities. Drawing on the work of Chantal Mouffe and Merijn Oudenampsen, the text suggests that the disappearance of ideological conflict between left and right after 1989 created a vacuum that populists filled with cultural and religious antagonisms. The author warns that Green and left-wing parties often inadvertently adopt populist frames—such as viewing religion as anti-modernist—and calls for a shift back to socio-economic analysis and the creation of inclusive, non-stereotypical political imagery.

The report details the outcomes of a conference on the legacy of wartime rape, emphasizing that sexual violence in conflict is a complex societal issue affecting victims, families, and communities. It identifies significant gaps in research regarding perpetrators and the long-term life histories of victims and children born of war. The document advocates for a holistic, multidisciplinary approach to support, the development of international guidelines for the rights of victims, and increased political pressure to prosecute perpetrators.

The report analyzes the shift in international development cooperation following the Busan High Level Forum, highlighting the rise of South-South cooperation and the challenge emerging powers pose to the OECD-DAC's Paris Declaration. It notes a transition from a narrow 'aid' agenda toward 'development effectiveness' and economic growth, particularly in Africa, where the influence of traditional Western donors is declining in favor of results-oriented investments from countries like China, India, and Brazil. While the Busan Outcomes Declaration seeks a more inclusive Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation, the document argues that a fundamental divide persists between Western aid practices and the mercantilist, tied-aid approaches of emerging economies.

The Freshwater Trout Aquaculture Dialogue (FTAD) has developed a comprehensive set of global standards for freshwater trout aquaculture, focusing on environmental and social responsibility. The standards cover six core principles: legal compliance, habitat and biodiversity conservation, water resource protection, fish health management, resource efficiency (specifically feed and energy), and social responsibility. Key requirements include prohibitions on transgenic trout and lethal predator control, strict limits on phosphorus discharge, and mandates for fair wages and the absence of child or forced labor. The standards apply to all freshwater trout production systems globally and require 100 percent compliance for certification. Implementation and third-party certification will be managed by the Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC).

The document highlights the critical role of healthy ecosystems in reducing the impacts of climate extremes and disasters. It argues that ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA) is often a more cost-effective and accessible strategy than hard engineering, providing co-benefits for livelihoods and biodiversity. The brief details how climate extremes—such as heat waves, droughts, and floods—can lead to species extinction, regime shifts in ecosystems, and the transformation of carbon sinks into sources. It emphasizes that disaster risk is driven not only by climate events but by vulnerability and exposure resulting from skewed development. The report advocates for a paradigm shift toward transformational changes in governance and the integration of disaster risk management (DRM) with climate change adaptation (CCA) to build long-term resilience.

The document translates the IPCC SREX report's findings into actionable insights for the water sector, emphasizing that disaster risk is increasing due to both climate extremes and rising human vulnerability. It highlights the high confidence that climate changes will seriously affect water management systems and argues for a shift from incremental to transformational changes in governance and infrastructure. The brief advocates for 'low regrets' adaptation strategies and the integration of disaster risk management (DRM) with climate change adaptation (CCA) to build long-term resilience.

The document is a compilation of research abstracts covering a wide array of climate-related topics. Key themes include the equity of burden-sharing in climate finance, the operationalization of REDD+ and MRV systems, the integration of adaptation into development planning (mainstreaming), and the transition to low-carbon energy systems. It examines specific case studies in regions such as Bangladesh, Mozambique, Nepal, and the Congo Basin, while analyzing global policy mechanisms like the UNFCCC, the Copenhagen Accord, and the Cancun Agreements.

The report synthesizes 93 selected research papers to explore how climate change affects development and how development can support adaptation and mitigation. It highlights the necessity of moving from incremental to transformational adaptation to avoid maladaptation, particularly in the face of high uncertainty. The document examines the challenges of managing natural resources across scales, the need for innovative private and public financial mechanisms to meet the $100 billion annual target for developing countries, and the requirement for a systemic transformation of energy systems through integrated regulatory and market policies. It emphasizes that climate objectives must be mainstreamed across all sectors, including energy, transport, and land use, while ensuring equity in effort-sharing and improving monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) systems.

The document examines the increasing influence of multinational corporations and business lobby groups within the UN system, particularly in the lead-up to the Rio+20 summit. It argues that this 'corporate capture' shifts the UN's focus from sustainable development and human rights toward market-based solutions that benefit the private sector. Through a series of case studies, the report highlights how initiatives like the 'Green Economy', 'Sustainable Energy for All' (SE4ALL), and the UN Global Compact facilitate 'greenwashing' and 'bluewashing', allowing companies to avoid regulation while gaining privileged access to policy-making. The authors call for a fundamental overhaul of UN decision-making processes, including the removal of business representatives from national delegations and the establishment of a legally binding framework for corporate accountability.

The document examines the growing influence of multinational corporations and business lobby groups within the UN, claiming that this 'corporate capture' shifts the focus from public interest and sustainable development toward market-based solutions that benefit the private sector. It provides case studies on the 'Green Economy' concept, the Sustainable Energy for All (SE4ALL) initiative, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation's role in agricultural policy via IFAD, the commodification of biodiversity in the CBD, the privatization of water policy, and the lack of accountability in the UN Global Compact. The report concludes with a set of recommendations to limit corporate influence, increase transparency, and establish legally binding corporate accountability frameworks.

The document examines the increasing influence of multinational corporations within the UN, specifically regarding the 'Green Economy', 'Sustainable Energy for All' (SE4ALL), the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), water policies, and the UN Global Compact. It contends that these partnerships lead to 'greenwashing' and the commodification of nature and water, while marginalizing civil society and the rights of the poor.

The report analyzes three global energy scenarios—Baseline, Basic Energy Access (BEA), and Shared Development Agenda (SDA)—to determine the pathways required to provide sustainable energy for all while limiting global warming to 2°C. It argues that achieving these goals requires a massive socio-technical transformation, including the virtual phase-out of conventional fossil fuels for electricity by 2050 and a significant increase in renewable energy and energy efficiency. Through 20 case studies, the document identifies barriers such as vested interests, high entry costs for the poor, and institutional inertia, while proposing a multi-level governance framework to coordinate innovation, mobilize finance, and align national policies with global sustainable development goals.

The report assesses three global energy scenarios—Baseline, Basic Energy Access, and Shared Development Agenda—to determine how to provide energy for development while limiting global warming to 2°C. It argues that achieving these goals requires a massive socio-technical transformation of energy supply and demand, moving beyond incremental changes to a system dominated by renewables and high energy efficiency. The authors emphasize that this transition requires multi-level governance, including stronger public RD&D, the removal of fossil fuel subsidies, and a shared global development agenda that prioritizes equitable income growth and energy access for the world's poorest regions.