Search Climate Insights Directory

A letter from Sasol to the South African Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA) providing comments on proposed amendments to the GN 248 List of Activities regarding atmospheric emissions. Sasol expresses support for the industry submission by CAIA/BUSA and highlights four primary concerns regarding the feasibility of standards for existing plants, compliance timelines, changes to activity scopes, and the alignment between waste and air quality regulations.

A letter from Sasol Limited to the South African Minister of Water and Environmental Affairs requesting urgent clarification on the commencement date of Government Notice 893 (GN893), published on 22 November 2013, regarding activities resulting in atmospheric emissions.

The document is a Pollution Prevention Plan (PPP) for Anglo American Coal South Africa (AACSA) covering the period from 2016 to 2020. It outlines the company's energy and carbon emission management plan (ECO2MAN), detailing emission sources, calculation methodologies, and planned mitigation measures for its South African coal operations.

A formal request sent on 29 November 2016 by the Life After Coal Campaign and other environmental organisations to the South African Minister of Energy, seeking an extension for public comment on the Integrated Energy Plan (IEP) and the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Update and demanding the release of critical supporting documents.

The document details a dispute over coal prospecting rights granted by the Department of Minerals (DMR) to Samancor Chrome Limited, later ceded to Commissiekraal Coal (Pty) Ltd and Bright Coal (Pty) Ltd, on the Farm Commissiekraal in KwaZulu-Natal. The case is highlighted because the prospecting occurs at the headwaters of the Pongola river system, a highly sensitive area. While the landowner, Nico Lens, supported the activity, downstream users and environmental groups—including the Greater Pongola River Catchment Protection Association (GPRCPA), WWF, and the Impala Water Users Association—opposed it, citing a lack of consultation. The GPRCPA only discovered the operations by chance through a contractor. The case raises concerns regarding the DMR's interpretation of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act (MPRDA) concerning ecological degradation and the transparency of the transfer of prospecting rights. An administrative appeal against the prospecting right was lodged on 15 February 2011.

The Centre for Environmental Rights (CER) has requested a meeting with the South African Department of Mineral Resources (DMR) to discuss the ongoing review of the Minerals and Petroleum Resources Development Act, 2002. The CER, acting on behalf of a strategy group of over ten non-governmental organisations, civil society groups, and academic institutions, aims to share expertise on environmental compliance, transparency, and accountability in mining to ensure draft legislation has greater civil society buy-in from an early stage.

The report argues that climate change causes profound adverse mental health implications for South Africans, exacerbating existing vulnerabilities caused by poverty and historical injustices. It highlights that exposures—such as natural disasters, water insecurity, and air pollution—lead to psychopathologies including anxiety, depression, and suicide. Children and future generations are identified as particularly vulnerable, facing psychological harms that can impair school performance and emotional well-being. The author further asserts that government decisions to continue developing coal capacity contribute to a sense of institutional betrayal and secondary trauma.

A letter from the South African Department of Environmental Affairs to Eskom stating that the postponement application for compliance with the 2015 Minimum Emission Standards for the Arnot Power Station has been placed on hold due to insufficient information.

The report finds that the proposed Lephalale Coal Mine (LCM) and its power plant will cause significant air quality violations and severe health and economic burdens. It argues that a previous environmental impact assessment (EIA) by GESI (2017) underestimated these impacts by neglecting mercury, existing pollution sources, and secondary PM2.5 formation. The analysis indicates that while mining alone causes 93 premature deaths, burning the coal on-site increases this to 3,120 deaths, and burning it at existing plants like Medupi or Matimba could lead to up to 41,984 premature deaths. Mercury emissions are projected to cause a loss of 3,700 IQ points and 554 lives, with significant deposition in protected ecosystems like the Waterberg Biosphere Reserve.

PPC Cement SA (Pty) Ltd submitted its 2018 Pollution Prevention Plan report to the Department of Environmental Affairs, detailing greenhouse gas emissions calculated in metric tonnes according to 2017 national regulations and guidelines.

This document is a legal notice filed in the High Court of South Africa on May 21, 2014, by Sasol Synfuels (Pty) Ltd, National Petroleum Refiners of South Africa (Pty) Ltd, and Sasol Infrachem. The applicants challenge the constitutionality of minimum emission standards published by the Minister of Water and Environmental Affairs under the National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act 39 of 2004.

The report presents the 2024 South African F-List, detailing 42 contracts between local agencies and fossil fuel clients, and highlights the reputational risks of such partnerships. It critiques the role of PR in masking the environmental and health impacts of companies like Sasol and TotalEnergies, while calling for industry awards like The Loeries to stop rewarding fossil fuel advertising.

In 2014, the labeled green bond market grew more than threefold to reach 366 billion USD, issued by 73 entities. International financial institutions remained the leaders, accounting for 44% of the market, with the European Investment Bank (EIB) as the largest issuer at 5.6 billion USD. The market saw significant diversification through corporate issuances totaling 12 billion USD, including a 3.4 billion USD issuance by GDF Suez, and the introduction of green asset-backed securities by Toyota. Municipal bonds also contributed, with US and Canadian provinces and cities like Gothenburg and Johannesburg participating. The total market size, including unlabeled green project bonds and ABS, is estimated between 38 billion and 39 billion USD, with a projection of 100 billion USD by the end of 2015.

KPMG Services Proprietary Limited conducted a pre-issuance limited assurance engagement for the City of Cape Town's proposed Green Bond. The report concludes that the nominated projects and the Green Bond Framework V2.3 conform to the 'Selection of Nominated Projects & Assets' and 'Internal Processes and Controls' sections of the Climate Bonds Standard V2.1. The bond is designed to refinance existing projects, with 92.8% of the allocation dedicated to water projects and 7.2% to low-carbon transport. A specific emphasis is placed on Project 6 (flood defences), which remains subject to post-issuance assurance as the relevant Climate Bonds Standard Water Criteria Phase 2 were still in draft at the time of the report.

The document examines the requirements for building onshore financial centres in Africa capable of competing with established conduits like Mauritius. It identifies Mauritius and Johannesburg as the most compelling current jurisdictions, while noting the ambitions of Rwanda and Kenya. It also highlights the potential role of donors in providing technical assistance to ensure international best practice in regulatory structures.

The report examines the role of fund domiciles in Sub-Saharan African private equity, highlighting the dominance of Mauritius due to its tax efficiency and legal stability. While there is growing interest in onshore alternatives—particularly in South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, and Morocco—the report finds that the high standards of legal, regulatory, and tax frameworks in offshore centres create a significant barrier to entry. It argues that donors should focus on strengthening the broader business environment and supporting private equity investment in SMEs rather than solely attempting to replicate administrative offshore hubs.

The briefing outlines the systemic failures of traditional municipal service delivery in South Africa, where over 7.32 million households in approximately 4,298 informal settlements face severe constraints. It proposes Alternative Service Delivery (ASD) as a paradigm shift based on Asset-Based Community Development (ABCD), emphasizing decentralization and public-private partnerships. The document establishes a framework of technical, social, and financial 'best practice norms' to ensure sustainability and community ownership. Through case studies like Peco Power (energy), Kaloola (sanitation), Regenize (waste), and Gcwalisa (food/waste), it demonstrates how off-grid and community-led solutions can provide interim services while working toward long-term goals. It concludes by recommending a systems approach to integrate ASD into provincial planning and calling for flexible policy and funding mechanisms.

The document outlines the potential for industrial symbiosis by using waste foundry sand (WFS) as a secondary material in sectors like brickmaking and road construction. It highlights the economic benefits for foundries and off-takers, the regulatory hurdles involving waste classification and management licenses, and the technical requirements for processing WFS to ensure product quality.

The report details a showcase event hosted by GreenCape to connect South African brand owners and retailers with packaging manufacturers offering recyclable alternatives to problematic flexible plastics, specifically targeting polypropylene (PP) and multilayer multi-polymer packaging. While mono-material polyethylene alternatives are identified as viable, the report highlights significant barriers to adoption, including a lack of local demand to justify dedicated production lines, high costs of upgrading filling lines, and a need for operator training. These challenges hinder the progress toward the South African Plastics Pact's 2025 targets, including the goal for 100% of plastic packaging to be reusable, recyclable, or compostable.

This case study examines the role of electronic waste (e-waste) repair and redistribution in South Africa, focusing on The Appliance Bank as a model for integrating circular economy principles with social upliftment. It highlights how diverting e-waste from landfills through refurbishment can create jobs for unemployed men and provide affordable technology to low-income communities.