Search Climate Insights Directory

The BalticClimate toolkit provides climate science overviews, scenarios, and tailored tools for policy-makers, spatial planners, and the business community in the Baltic Sea Region. It offers projections for sectors such as agriculture, energy, and housing, alongside over 120 practical examples of 'win-win-win' solutions for adaptation, mitigation, and economic development. Specific tools include checklists for policy-makers, a Vulnerability Assessment framework for spatial planners, and a Climate SWOT analysis for small- and medium-sized enterprises.

The report identifies a wide array of technical innovations for phosphorus capture and reuse in the Baltic Sea Region but notes they are often voluntary and under-supported by EU policy. Stakeholders generally oppose a centralised EU regulatory approach, citing a lack of confidence in administration and the need to respect regional diversity in farming systems. Instead, there is significant interest in market-based approaches to commoditise phosphorus residues and the use of stakeholder platforms to mediate between competing regional interests.

The document details a workshop held at the Stockholm Resilience Centre involving approximately 35 participants. It examines social learning across four primary domains: natural resource management, climate change adaptation, social learning platforms, and the intersection of education and society. The proceedings highlight the definitional complexity of 'social learning', the influence of power dynamics, and the challenges of measuring learning outcomes in time-bound participatory projects. Key discussions emphasize the need for multi-level learning to build adaptive capacity in social-ecological systems and the role of 'shadow spaces' in facilitating international governance.

The report examines the Baltic Sea Region's trajectory toward 2030, contrasting a business-as-usual scenario with a sustainability vision. It argues that conventional development will lead to increased environmental pressure and persistent socio-economic disparities, whereas a sustainability vision requires decoupling economic growth from resource throughput through aggressive technological innovation and a shift in human values.

The document argues that while the Baltic Sea Region has a strong tradition of environmental co-operation, it is not yet on a path toward sustainable development. It proposes 'Baltic 21', a regional action programme designed to bridge economic disparities between the West Baltic Region (WBR) and East Baltic Region (EBR) while addressing critical environmental threats. The report identifies key risks including eutrophication of the Baltic Sea, acid rain, and the environmental legacy of Soviet-era industry in Russia and Poland. It emphasizes the need for a holistic approach that integrates sustainability into key sectors—energy, agriculture, forestry, transport, and industry—and leverages the influence of the European Union's pre-accession strategies to harmonize environmental standards across the region.

The CASCADE project is a 24-month initiative (2019–2020) funded by DG ECHO with a budget of 867,028 euros. It focuses on increasing risk management capability in the Baltic Sea Region through the development of an online tool for integrated climate change and disaster risk reduction, a risk assessment methodology for urban contexts, and training for city officials. The project also facilitates policy dialogues across governance levels to improve coherence on climate risk assessments and promote the UN Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction.

This event report summarizes a May 2019 workshop in Gdansk, Poland, focused on improving water and nutrient governance in the Baltic Sea region. Key discussions centered on the challenges of phosphorus recycling, the role of cities and public procurement in driving circular innovations, the use of testbeds for scaling technology, and the potential for carbon farming to mitigate climate change while improving soil health. The report highlights that while technical solutions exist, market demand, regulatory barriers based on product origin, and a lack of trust remain primary obstacles to the widespread adoption of symbiotic circular economy models.

Work Package 2 (WP2) of the CADWAGO project investigates how formal and informal institutional arrangements mediate the relationship between society and water resources under the pressure of climate change. Using a social institutions framework, the research employs two primary analytical tools: the context-structure-process-outcomes (CSPO) framework to analyse organisational functioning and the "five capitals" approach (human, social, natural, physical, and financial) to evaluate adaptive capacity. The study utilizes ten international case studies, including specific analyses of flooding in the Baltic Sea Region and along the south-east Queensland coast, to identify governance practices that enable systemic transformation and water security. Led by the University of the Sunshine Coast with partners from Griffith University, the University of Tasmania, and Oak Ridge National Laboratory, the work involves stakeholder interviews and literature synthesis to provide policy-makers with insights into climate change adaptation regimes.

The document reports on a survey of farmers in the Baltic Sea region, finding that while most are aware of water quality issues and accept responsibility for pollution, their priorities differ by country. Farmers in Estonia and Poland identify manure storage as a primary pollution source and request more support for modernization, whereas Swedish farmers do not view it as a priority. The brief highlights a divide between farmers who see themselves as 'land managers' providing public goods and those focused primarily on production. It recommends shifting toward outcome-based approaches, positive communication, and adaptive bureaucracy to improve the effectiveness of water protection management.

The report evaluates Denmark's efforts to increase biogas production from 5% to 50% of total manure by 2020 to meet renewable energy and GHG targets. It identifies significant financial and infrastructural barriers at the national level, including a lack of break-even pricing and an 'infrastructural lock-in' favoring existing energy providers. A case study of the Biokraft plant on Bornholm reveals that while political support and nutrient management benefits (such as meeting 'harmony requirements') enable adoption, the plant suffered from failed high-tech investments and unstable manure supply. The report concludes that biogas's effectiveness as a tool for combating nutrient pollution is contested, and its success depends on multi-stakeholder innovation partnerships and a more transparent debate on its actual risks and benefits.