Search Climate Insights Directory

The Changing Markets Foundation writes to Nestlé's CEO, Ulf Mark Schneider, regarding the company's role as a major plastic polluter and its failure to meet recycling and recycled content targets. The letter argues that Nestlé's voluntary commitments often lack specificity and accountability, and urges the company to support mandatory legislative solutions, such as global Deposit Return Systems (DRS), and to be transparent about its full plastic footprint.

The Changing Markets Foundation's investigation into ten of the world's most plastic-polluting companies revealed a global trend of corporations undermining legislative solutions to the plastic crisis. The foundation specifically identifies Perfetti van Melle as one of the least ambitious and transparent companies, noting its failure to disclose its annual plastic footprint or support legislative measures. The letter urges Perfetti van Melle to adopt specific recommendations, including supporting global deposit return systems, disclosing its full plastic footprint, and committing to measurable reductions in single-use plastics.

The report assesses China's green investment potential, highlighting a need for 3 to 4 trillion RMB annually by 2030. It examines the role of green bonds as a primary financing tool, the impact of regional green finance pilot zones, and the necessity of aligning domestic green definitions with international standards to attract global capital. It also explores opportunities in 'new infrastructure' post-COVID-19 and the transition of high-emission 'brown' industries.

The report examines how services—ranging from R&D and IT to waste management and repair—enable circular economy business models. Based on a survey of 96 firms, it finds that approximately 70% of circular service providers export their services, often via digital means (Mode 1) or foreign subsidiaries (Mode 3). The study highlights that micro and small enterprises are disproportionately active in this trade. Key barriers identified include divergent national regulations on waste and secondary materials, as well as data flow restrictions. The authors argue for an integrated trade policy that liberalizes both goods and services simultaneously to accelerate the global transition to a circular economy.

The workshop, part of the 'Support for the NDC implementation in the Waste Management sector in Senegal and Côte D’Ivoire' project, provided technical training on GHG and short-lived climate pollutant (SLCP) inventories. Participants were introduced to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines, the IPCC inventory software (version 2.691), and the EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook. The training included practical exercises using activity data from Benin to estimate emissions from open burning of municipal solid waste and wastewater management.

The report argues that the plastic industry employs a 'corporate playbook' of delaying, distracting, and derailing progressive legislation to protect profits and maintain a linear economy. It analyzes the voluntary commitments of ten major polluters, including Coca-Cola, Nestlé, and PepsiCo, finding them largely non-binding and lacking transparency. The document details how industry groups use 'greenwashing' tactics—such as promoting chemical recycling and bioplastics—to divert attention from the need for mandatory collection systems like Deposit Return Schemes (DRS). Case studies across 15 countries, including the US, EU, China, and Kenya, illustrate how corporations lobby against bans on single-use plastics and shift responsibility to consumers. The report concludes that voluntary initiatives have failed and calls for mandatory legislation, including high collection targets, virgin plastic taxes, and a global treaty on plastic pollution.

The report argues that the plastics industry employs a 'corporate playbook' of delay, distraction, and derailment to protect its business model. It analyzes voluntary commitments from major polluters, finding them lacking in accountability and ambition. Through case studies in 15 countries, it demonstrates how companies lobby against mandatory collection systems like Deposit Return Systems (DRS) and promote 'false solutions' such as chemical recycling and bioplastics to shift responsibility onto consumers.

The report argues that the plastic industry employs a 'playbook' of distraction, delay, and diversion to protect profits while appearing to address the plastic crisis. It analyzes the voluntary commitments of ten major polluters, finding them largely lacking in transparency and accountability. The document highlights how companies use trade associations and fake environmental groups to lobby against mandatory collection and reuse laws, even while publicly supporting some initiatives. It concludes that voluntary actions have failed and calls for mandatory legislation, including deposit return systems and taxes on virgin plastics.

The document exposes how the plastic industry uses a 'playbook' of confusion, delay, and prevention to thwart progressive laws. It argues that voluntary commitments by major corporations are largely 'lip service' and that the industry actively lobbies against mandatory collection and reuse systems while promoting 'false solutions' like chemical recycling.

The document argues that the plastic industry uses a 'manual' of delay, distraction, and derailment tactics to protect profits and avoid mandatory regulations. It analyzes voluntary commitments from ten major polluters and over 50 collective initiatives, concluding that they lack transparency, accountability, and effectiveness. The report highlights how companies promote 'false solutions' like chemical recycling and bio-based plastics while lobbying against deposit return systems and mandatory collection targets. Case studies across 15 countries demonstrate a pattern of corporate hypocrisy, where companies may support legislation in the EU while fighting it in Africa, China, and the US.

The report argues that major plastic polluters use voluntary initiatives as a 'smoke screen' to delay, distract, and derail progressive legislation. It analyzes the commitments of the ten largest plastic polluters and over 50 joint initiatives, finding them lacking in ambition, transparency, and accountability. The document details industry tactics such as shifting blame to consumers and promoting chemical recycling, while calling for mandatory legislation, including 90% collection targets and deposit return systems.

The report argues that the plastic industry employs a 'corporate playbook' of delay, distraction, and derailment to protect profits and avoid mandatory regulation. It finds that voluntary commitments from major polluters are often 'paper promises' lacking transparency and accountability, while group initiatives serve as a 'smokescreen' for continued plastic production. The document calls for robust, mandatory legislation, including deposit return systems and virgin-plastic taxes, to address the crisis.

The report argues that the plastic industry in India employs lobbying and distraction tactics to protect profits and maintain the production of single-use plastics. It highlights how key legislation, such as the Plastic Waste Management Rules, has been watered down through industry influence, specifically regarding the phase-out of multi-layered plastics. The document also criticizes voluntary corporate pledges from companies like Nestlé, Unilever, and PepsiCo, characterizing them as lacking transparency and relying on 'downcycling' rather than true circularity.

The report argues that current funding for chemicals and waste management is inadequate, particularly in developing and transition countries, and proposes a coordinated international tax on basic chemicals to operationalize the 'polluter pays' principle. It suggests that a 0.5% tax on the production value of basic chemicals could raise approximately $11.5 billion annually, significantly exceeding current funding from the Global Environment Facility (GEF) and the Special Programme. The authors recommend an origin-based excise tax on a specific list of basic chemicals (such as ammonia, benzene, and chlorine) to ensure administrative simplicity and minimize economic distortion. The document evaluates this option against other potential taxes—including income, asset, and transaction taxes—concluding that an excise tax is the most feasible and effective mechanism for internalizing the social and environmental costs of chemical production.

The document identifies critical gaps in the EU's approach to endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), noting that current laws fail to account for non-monotonic dose responses and the irreversibility of EDC effects. It argues that the EU has a legal and moral obligation under the precautionary principle to prevent harm, particularly to vulnerable populations like children. To address these failures, the brief proposes three primary actions: launching a broad REACH restriction for already identified EDCs based on existing lists, updating chemical screening systems through implementing acts and guidance to eliminate 'blind spots', and adopting a new legislative act to create a coordinated, continuously updated EU list of EDCs that automatically triggers regulatory consequences across all sectors.

The report inventories organic waste in Naivasha, Kenya, identifying significant potential for resource recovery from wastewater, faecal sludge, municipal solid waste, and agro-industrial residues. It highlights existing initiatives such as biogas production at Gorge Farm Energy Park and briquette manufacturing by Sanivation, while noting critical data gaps and stakeholder conflicts in waste collection.

The document advocates for a circular economy to replace the linear "take-make-waste" model, which currently results in over 60% of the 100 billion tons of resources flowing into the economy annually ending up as waste or emissions. It proposes three pathways for transition: consuming less, consuming better through sustainable choices and sharing platforms, and implementing systemic changes such as designing products for longevity and introducing policy incentives for recycled materials. The guide highlights that circularity in five key sectors could reduce CO2 emissions by 3.7 billion tons by 2050 and presents a $4.5 trillion economic opportunity.

The document highlights that less than 10% of plastics are recycled in Canada, with over 3 million tonnes entering landfills or the environment annually. It notes that the COVID-19 pandemic increased reliance on single-use plastics and introduced new pollutants like personal protective equipment (PPE), which can contribute microplastic fibres to waterways. The author argues that Canada's linear waste management approach results in an economic loss of nearly CAD 8 billion and recommends a transition to a circular economy, a ban on harmful single-use plastics by 2021, and increased investment in freshwater plastic research.

The strategy aims to integrate the private sector into Saint Lucia's National Adaptation Plan (NAP) by educating businesses on climate risks, facilitating access to finance, and promoting public-private partnerships (PPPs). It maps the domestic economy, which is dominated by micro-businesses and the services sector, and proposes a four-step engagement cycle: initiate, inform, incorporate, and involve. Key priorities include climate-proofing the tourism, agriculture, and infrastructure sectors, and exploring innovative financing such as green and blue bonds.

The workshop, conducted by the Stockholm Environment Institute and partners, focused on the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for GHG inventories and the EMEP/EEA guidebook for short-lived climate pollutants (SLCP). Participants were trained in using IPCC software (version 2.691) and Excel worksheets to estimate emissions from waste sources, including solid waste disposal and open burning. The training emphasized the requirements of the Paris Agreement's Enhanced Transparency Framework, specifically the submission of Biennial Transparency Reports (BTR) by December 31, 2024.