Search Climate Insights Directory

The document introduces the Corporate Transition Assessment (CTA) framework, designed for financial institutions in India to move beyond surface-level disclosures and evaluate a company's transition readiness across strategy, feasibility, and accountability. It specifically applies this framework to a case study of a leading Indian primary steel producer ('Company X'), detailing the process of mapping transition vulnerability, assessing decarbonisation strategies, and evaluating the technical and economic feasibility of levers such as green hydrogen, scrap utilisation, and Carbon Capture, Utilisation, and Storage (CCUS). The guide also provides a broader analysis of the Indian steel sector's decarbonisation landscape, including the role of government policies and the potential of various technology pathways to reach net-zero targets.

The document details Rwanda's shift from framework-level climate commitments in NDC 2.0 to an outcome-driven strategy in NDC 3.0, specifically for the water and mining sectors. It introduces SMART indicators, disaggregated water storage targets, and specific adoption rates for climate-compatible mining, supported by detailed funding estimates and institutional mandates to enhance accountability and investor confidence.

The Savings and Investment Union (SIU) aims to bridge the gap between household savings and productive investments to address an annual financing gap of €750–800 billion by 2030. However, the author contends that the SIU lacks mechanisms to channel funds specifically toward EU priorities or the ecological transition, meaning it could facilitate lending to heavily polluting activities. The document highlights that the initiative is likely to benefit highly concentrated asset management firms, particularly US-based BlackRock and Vanguard, which are identified as major investors in fossil fuel bonds and supporters of fossil fuel company governance.

The report assesses the state of asset management and pension systems across Africa, highlighting a general trend of conservative investment strategies, low retail participation, and uneven regulatory oversight. It identifies a strong prevalence of defined benefit and pay-as-you-go pension schemes, particularly in francophone and lusophone countries, while anglophone nations lean toward funded defined contribution models. Key challenges include low coverage for informal workers and women, limited ESG integration, and a heavy reliance on government securities. The document recommends shifting toward risk-based supervision, expanding micro-pension schemes, and developing national ESG taxonomies to deepen capital markets.

The Resilient Coasts – Caribbean Sea project, led by the Stockholm Environment Institute, uses 'living labs' in the Dominican Republic and Colombia to test nature-based solutions for coastal resilience. The project focuses on rehabilitating mangroves and coral reefs to reduce wave energy, prevent erosion, and support local economies through fishing and tourism, while developing sustainable financing models and community-led rehabilitation strategies.

The report examines the state of nature-related financial disclosures in South Africa, noting that while awareness is growing, formal adoption of the TNFD framework remains low. It advocates for the LEAP (Locate, Evaluate, Assess, and Prepare) methodology as a practical tool for companies to identify their dependencies on nature and manage associated financial and operational risks. The document highlights specific applications for the mining and agriculture sectors and emphasizes the need for technical capacity building and cross-sector collaboration to transition toward a nature-positive economy.

The Canadian government has provided initial two-year funding to create a sustainable investment taxonomy. This framework, developed by an independent Taxonomy Council supported by the Canadian Climate Institute and Tomorrow's Business Path, aims to establish a common language for 'green' and 'transition' investments. The goal is to mobilize private capital for clean growth and decarbonize high-emission sectors. The Council intends to finalize guidelines for three priority sectors by late 2026 and an additional three by autumn 2027, ensuring alignment with international taxonomies and science-based targets.

The document examines the rapid growth of Indonesia's nickel sector driven by global demand for clean energy technologies, noting that this expansion has caused high carbon emissions, workplace accidents, and social conflicts. It identifies gaps in Indonesia's regulatory framework regarding biodiversity, human rights, and sustainability reporting when compared to international standards. To address these, the brief recommends mandating ecosystem assessments, human rights due diligence, decarbonization plans, and improved benefit-sharing mechanisms for local communities.

The 2025 G20 presidency under South Africa served as a symbolic platform for African priorities, including debt sustainability and just energy transition, but faced significant challenges due to the absence of the US and a general lack of collective ambition on climate change. While the presidency successfully advanced discussions on critical minerals and disaster resilience, the Final Communiqué failed to mention transitioning away from fossil fuels, reflecting a broader trend of G20 paralysis on environmental leadership.

Reclaim Finance advocates for a revised SFDR framework (SFDR 2) to address confusion and greenwashing caused by the original 2019 regulation. The organization supports the exclusion of fossil fuel developers from sustainable and transition categories, calls for clearer criteria for 'transition' assets, and identifies inconsistencies in the European Commission's proposal regarding reporting obligations and fund claims.

The document argues that the original SFDR created confusion and enabled greenwashing due to a lack of clear minimum guarantees. It proposes that the revised 'SFDR 2' should exclude fossil fuel developers from all categories, establish stricter and clearer criteria for 'transition' assets, and resolve inconsistencies regarding reporting obligations for non-categorized funds to restore investor trust.

The report finds that while OECD pension funds are increasing their climate target-setting and internal governance, their portfolios remain heavily exposed to expansionist fossil fuels. Progress is strongly linked to national regulatory environments, with the Netherlands, Denmark, and the UK leading. A critical lever for future impact is the governance of the asset owner–asset manager relationship, where leading funds are moving toward more active mandates, stricter stewardship oversight, and in some cases, the internalization of asset management to ensure alignment with net-zero goals.

In 2024, IDFC members reported USD 173 billion in green finance commitments, a 13% decrease from 2023. Climate finance dominated these flows, accounting for 96% (USD 167 billion) of the total, with mitigation finance at USD 140 billion and adaptation finance increasing by 64% to USD 17 billion. Biodiversity finance rose to USD 8 billion, while USD 4 billion was allocated to other environmental objectives like the circular economy.

The IISD submission to the OECD proposes reforming investment treaties to remove cross-border barriers to green investment and ensure investment protection does not override state climate obligations. Key recommendations include increasing transparency and accountability in project governance, establishing shared norms for the green transition, and requiring responsible business conduct from foreign investors.

The Net Zero Finance Tracker (NZFT) Methodology 2025 describes a framework for assessing the Paris Agreement alignment of 1,500 global financial institutions, representing approximately USD 286 trillion in assets. The methodology employs a three-dimensional approach—Targets, Implementation, and Impact—using a mix of qualitative tiered scoring and quantitative metrics. Key updates for 2025 include expanded institutional coverage, the integration of new frameworks such as the TPT and OECD, and the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for primary data extraction from corporate reports. The document details how the NZFT tracks mitigation targets, climate risk management, and financial flows to clean energy and fossil fuels, while introducing an ownership attribution approach to link financial holdings to real-economy emissions and physical risks.

The document describes a project running from November 2025 to December 2026 aimed at helping Nigerian transport-related businesses transition to low-carbon operations. It highlights that the transport sector accounts for over 25% of Nigeria's GHG emissions and identifies significant barriers for SMEs in accessing climate finance. The initiative provides training, technical guidance for bankable projects, and support for carbon market engagement to improve business competitiveness and public health.

The document examines the alignment of Indonesia's business sector with the 2035 NDC, highlighting a potential investment opportunity of USD 3.8 trillion. While over 100 Indonesian companies have adopted science-based targets, the report identifies significant barriers including regulatory uncertainty, fragmented institutional responsibility, and a lack of a standardized 'green investment' definition. It proposes solutions such as 'power wheeling' for renewable energy access, blended finance mechanisms, and sectoral decarbonization roadmaps for energy, industry, and transport to ensure the NDC is 'investible' and supports the national goal of net-zero by 2060.

The UK has reduced emissions by 50.4% since 1990 while growing its economy by nearly 80%, with the net zero economy contributing £83.1 billion to GDP in 2024. However, the report identifies a 'policy implementation gap,' noting that as of June 2025, credible plans existed for only 38% of the reductions needed for the 2030 NDC. The document calls for a holistic approach to electrification, the creation of lead markets for green technologies, a national retrofit strategy for housing, and a comprehensive plan to close a green skills gap of up to 400,000 workers. It also emphasizes the need to align climate goals with nature recovery and to overcome political polarization by communicating the economic benefits of the transition to the public.

The document argues that the AfCFTA can mitigate Africa's youth unemployment crisis by fostering a regional market for greentech goods and services. It highlights a significant trade deficit in green goods and suggests that localising production—supported by tax incentives, digital skills training, and the revitalisation of Indigenous environmental practices—can create millions of jobs. While carbon-intensive sectors may lose up to 4.2 million jobs by 2050, the energy transition could create up to 12 million jobs in the same period, provided that regulatory barriers are removed and investment is facilitated.

The report examines the paradox of Indonesia's nickel sector, where a critical mineral for the clean energy transition is processed using carbon-intensive captive coal. It identifies a significant expansion of captive coal capacity, projected to exceed 32 GW by 2031, driven by resource nationalism and the need for stable power in remote regions. The document contrasts 'Green Opportunism' (short-term gains via coal) with 'Green Developmentalism' (long-term competitiveness via decarbonisation) and proposes specific roles for Chinese stakeholders to support a sustainable transition through technical assistance, green finance, and market-shaping rules.