Search Climate Insights Directory

The study finds that CDM projects generally overestimate their emission reduction potential, with actual CER issuance reaching only 76% of the amount predicted at registration. Performance varies significantly by project type, with N2O projects over-performing (129%) and animal waste projects under-performing (28%). The analysis also indicates that in-house project development generally outperforms the use of large external consultancies, and that India showed the best host-country performance (122%) compared to China (55%) and Brazil (90%).

The paper analyzes nine Brazilian CDM projects, finding that forecasted CER generation typically decreases as projects move from validation to issuance due to methodology changes, lower-than-expected output, and delays. While additionality arguments are generally credible, they are sometimes weakened by the rapid spread of technology. The study also concludes that the Brazilian national stakeholder consultation process is insufficient for gathering local concerns, as fewer than 5% of projects receive comments through the standard procedure.

The paper evaluates six Chinese CDM projects (four registered and two in validation) to assess how they perform against their initial designs. It finds that forecasted Certified Emission Reductions (CERs) fluctuate significantly as projects progress, often due to new standardised baseline information from China's Designated National Authority (DNA) and technological barriers. All sampled projects claim investment barriers, but only half provide a complete investment analysis. The study also notes a lack of standardised stakeholder consultation procedures in China, with written surveys being the most common method. While projects often align with stakeholder expectations regarding local employment, sustainability benefits are not described quantitatively in the Project Design Documents (PDDs).

The document describes hydrokinetic energy as a clean alternative to fossil fuels and traditional dams, utilizing the kinetic energy of moving water. It details various conversion technologies, including wave energy converters and rotating devices, while assessing the resource potential of US coastal and river systems. The text highlights the predictability of water-based power and the potential to avoid millions of metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions by 2025. However, it identifies significant barriers to commercialization, specifically citing a restrictive regulatory environment and the need for increased federal funding and streamlined permitting processes.

An analysis of 52 Indian CDM projects registered by May 2006 reveals a systemic preference for barrier analysis over investment analysis, with significant gaps in transparency and evidence. The study finds that while 94% of projects use barrier tests, only 33% conduct investment analyses, and only 50% identify alternatives. Detailed case studies of JSW Steel and Bajaj Auto illustrate that the CDM Executive Board's additionality assessments are inconsistent, often depending on how information is 'packaged' by developers. The author concludes that validators frequently fail to critically evaluate barrier claims, potentially allowing non-additional projects to increase net global emissions.

The report estimates that the Coal Phase-Out Regulations, Clean Electricity Regulations (CER), Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Regulations, and Methane Regulations will provide between $18 billion and $21 billion in direct health benefits by 2050. These savings, primarily derived from respiratory benefits of reduced emissions, are equivalent to the cost of 2,200 to 2,500 doctors over a 36-year period. The regulations target pollutants including particulate matter, benzene, mercury, lead, NOX, SOX, PM2.5, and VOCs.

The report analyzes four Canadian environmental regulations—Coal Phase-Out, Clean Electricity, VOC, and Methane—finding they provide between $18 billion and $21 billion in direct health benefits by 2050. It argues that these savings could be used to address healthcare shortages, such as hiring 2,200 to 2,500 doctors, and cautions against the use of discount rates that undervalue the health of future generations.

The document highlights Afghanistan's significant superhot rock geothermal resources, noting that just 1% of this endowment could provide 144 GW of energy capacity. It argues that this energy source could reduce energy poverty, lower land-use requirements compared to other renewables, and provide reliable firm power to the electrical grid.

The document highlights the immense potential of superhot rock geothermal energy in Alaska, noting that just 1% of the state's resource could generate over 5 million GWh of electricity. It argues that this technology offers a land-efficient, reliable source of firm power that could leverage Alaska's existing oil and gas subsurface expertise for a zero-carbon transition.

The document highlights that just 1% of Algeria's superhot rock geothermal resource could provide 819 GW of energy capacity, far exceeding the country's projected 2050 electricity demand of 181,286 GWh. While not expected to reach commercial scale by 2030, this technology could theoretically replace all fossil fuels used in Algeria's electricity production, eliminate coal imports, and support desalination and hydrogen production. The resource is noted for its low land footprint (12 km² per 1 GW) and its potential to leverage existing subsurface expertise from Algeria's oil and gas sector.

The document highlights that just 1% of Angola's estimated superhot rock geothermal resource could provide 197 GW of energy capacity, far exceeding the country's projected 2050 electricity demand of 62,933 GWh. It argues that this technology could replace fossil fuels in the electricity sector, reducing emissions by approximately 4 megatonnes of CO2eq, while utilizing significantly less land than solar, wind, or biomass. Additionally, the report suggests that Angola's existing oil and gas workforce and subsurface expertise could facilitate a transition to this zero-carbon energy source to address energy poverty and low electrification rates in rural areas.

The document highlights that just 1% of Argentina's superhot rock geothermal resource could provide 2,659 GW of energy capacity, far exceeding the country's projected 2050 electricity demand of 348,032 GWh. This resource could theoretically replace all fossil fuels used for electricity production, reducing emissions by approximately 47 megatonnes of CO2eq, which represents 129% of Argentina's Nationally Determined Contribution goal. Additionally, the technology offers high energy density, requiring only 12 km² of land per 1 GW, and could eliminate the need for the 17% of natural gas and 4% of electricity that Argentina currently imports.

The document highlights that just 1% of Armenia's estimated superhot rock geothermal resource could provide 40 GW of energy capacity, far exceeding the country's 2021 electricity consumption of 7,876 GWh. This resource could theoretically replace all coal and gas used for electricity production, reducing emissions by approximately 2 megatonnes of CO2eq, which represents 16% of Armenia's Nationally Determined Contribution goal for 2030. Additionally, the technology offers a low land footprint, requiring roughly 12 km² per 1 GW, and could eliminate Armenia's dependence on natural gas and electricity imports.

The document highlights that just 1% of Azerbaijan's estimated superhot rock geothermal resource could provide 94 GW of energy capacity, far exceeding the country's 2021 electricity consumption of 27,885 GWh. This resource could theoretically replace all fossil fuels used in Azerbaijan's electricity production, reducing emissions by approximately 13 megatonnes of CO2eq, which represents 41% of the nation's Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) goal. The report emphasizes the technology's low land footprint—requiring roughly 12 km² per 1 GW—and its ability to leverage existing subsurface expertise from Azerbaijan's oil and gas sector.

The document highlights that just 1% of Bolivia's estimated superhot rock geothermal resource could provide 549 GW of energy capacity, far exceeding the country's 2021 electricity consumption of 10,829 GWh. It argues that this technology could replace coal and gas imports, leverage existing oil and gas subsurface expertise, and require significantly less land than other energy sources.

The document highlights that just 1% of Brunei's estimated superhot rock geothermal resource could provide 9 GW of energy capacity, generating over 71,162 GWh of electricity. This amount is approximately 12 times Brunei's 2021 electricity consumption of 5,698 GWh. Utilizing this resource could theoretically replace all coal and gas used for electricity production, reducing carbon emissions by about 5 megatonnes, which represents 77% of Brunei's Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) goal of 5.9 megatonnes by 2030. Additionally, the technology is noted for its low land footprint, requiring roughly 12 km² per 1 GW, and its potential to leverage existing subsurface expertise from Brunei's oil and gas sector.

The document highlights that just 1% of Bulgaria's estimated superhot rock geothermal resource could provide 98 GW of energy capacity, generating over 812,237 GWh of electricity. This amount is 17 times the country's 2021 electricity consumption and could theoretically replace all coal and gas used for electricity production, reducing emissions by approximately 21 megatonnes of CO2eq. The report argues that superhot rock geothermal offers a low land-use footprint (12 km² per 1 GW) and provides reliable 24/7 power, which would reduce Bulgaria's dependence on coal (10% imported) and natural gas (96% imported).

The document highlights that just 1% of Cameroon's estimated superhot rock geothermal resource could provide 427 GW of energy capacity, far exceeding the country's 2021 electricity consumption of 7,937 GWh. While unlikely to meet 2030 climate goals, this technology could theoretically replace all coal and gas in the electricity sector, reducing emissions by approximately 2 megatonnes of CO2eq. The report emphasizes the technology's low land footprint (12 km² per 1 GW) and its potential to address energy poverty, as over 35% of Cameroon's population currently lacks electricity access.

The Clean Electricity Performance Program (CEPP) uses a system of grants and payments to incentivize retail electricity suppliers to increase their share of clean electricity by 4 percentage points annually from 2023 to 2030. Suppliers meeting this goal receive Department of Energy grants, while those falling short must make payments. Clean electricity is defined as any source emitting no more than 0.10 metric tons of CO2-equivalent per MWh, encompassing renewables, nuclear, and carbon-captured fossil fuels. The program includes flexibility for suppliers to average performance over two or three years and provides exemptions from payments for suppliers with a clean electricity share of 85% or higher, provided there is no backsliding.

The Clean Air Task Force (CATF) is leading a project to reform the incentive and reward ecosystem for carbon-free energy (CFE) procurement. The initiative aims to move beyond limited renewable energy standards toward metrics that accurately reflect carbon impact, targeting the buying power of corporations, governments, and utilities. Key activities include updating GHG accounting standards, supporting pilot transactions, and helping federal agencies implement Executive Order 14057 to achieve 50% 24/7 CFE by 2030.