Search Climate Insights Directory

The document outlines the interaction between climate change, human vulnerability, and disaster risk in Latin America and the Caribbean. It emphasizes that while climate change is altering the frequency and intensity of extreme events, human factors—such as unplanned urbanization and poverty—are primary drivers of increasing disaster impacts. The report advocates for an integrated approach that combines disaster risk management (DRM) with climate change adaptation (CCA) and sustainable development, moving from incremental to transformational changes in governance and infrastructure.

The document analyzes the interaction between extreme climate events, human vulnerability, and exposure in Asia. It highlights that disaster risk is increasing not only due to climate change but also because more vulnerable populations are exposed to hazards. The report provides regional climate trends, examines the socio-economic impacts of floods, heat stress, and cyclones, and advocates for the integration of disaster risk management (DRM) with climate change adaptation (CCA) and sustainable development. It emphasizes the need for legislative frameworks, early warning systems, and risk transfer mechanisms like index insurance to build long-term resilience.

Ghana faces significant cooling deficits across agriculture, healthcare, and urban environments. In the food sector, 3.2 million tons of food are lost annually, while the healthcare cold chain is hampered by unreliable electricity and a lack of refrigerated transport. Urban areas, particularly Accra, suffer from the urban heat island effect, with 85% of air conditioners being of the lowest energy efficiency category, disproportionately affecting vulnerable populations and women.

The policy brief highlights that forests influence the climate through four key non-carbon biophysical processes: albedo, evapotranspiration, surface roughness, and aerosols. It argues that focusing solely on carbon underestimates the cooling value of tropical forests and ignores local temperature spikes caused by deforestation. The authors propose six specific ways for UNFCCC Parties to integrate these effects into national greenhouse gas inventories, Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), REDD+ reporting, adaptation planning, the Global Stocktake, and the IPCC's Seventh Assessment Report (AR7).

The document highlights that tropical deforestation contributes 50% more to global warming than carbon emissions alone when biophysical effects are included. These effects—albedo, evapotranspiration, surface roughness, and aerosols—regulate local temperatures and regional rainfall. Deforestation disrupts these processes, leading to decreased crop yields (e.g., a 12% drop in soy productivity in Brazil) and increased heat stress for workers. The authors urge companies and investors to move beyond reputational goals and address these material risks through jurisdictional collaboration, improved spatial analysis, and stricter financial disclosures.

The document highlights that tropical deforestation contributes 50% more to global warming than carbon emissions alone due to biophysical processes like albedo, evapotranspiration, surface roughness, and aerosols. These non-carbon effects cause local temperature spikes and regional rainfall disruptions, leading to direct productivity losses in commodities such as soy and impacting worker safety through heat stress. It calls on companies and financial institutions to move beyond reputational risk management and address these material operational risks through jurisdictional cooperation, improved spatial research, and stricter portfolio alignment.

The Urban Community Resilience Assessment (UCRA) is a bottom-up planning tool that integrates local neighborhood knowledge with city-wide resilience strategies. Piloted in Rio de Janeiro, Surat, and Semarang, the tool uses three dimensions—city-level vulnerability, neighborhood resilience potential, and household capacities—to identify infrastructure gaps and social needs. While the UCRA promotes inclusive planning and provides detailed local baselines, pilot results highlighted challenges including high costs, time-intensive methodology, and a lack of political leadership.