Search Climate Insights Directory

The document argues that relying solely on landfill gas capture and flaring is insufficient for methane mitigation. It highlights that gas capture systems often have a default recovery rate of about 50% and can fail due to poor design or maintenance, with some sites with capture systems exhibiting higher average emission rates than those without. The brief promotes organic waste diversion as the primary strategy to prevent methane generation at the source and suggests complementary solutions such as microbial methane oxidation systems (biocovers, biofilters, and biowindows) and improved operational practices like minimizing active working faces and enhancing cover systems. It further notes that while enclosed flares can exceed 98% destruction efficiency, open flares are more variable, and neither can eliminate methane that bypasses the collection system.

The document analyzes methane emissions in Algeria's oil and gas sector, estimating annual emissions at 2,304 kt. It finds that 41% of these emissions can be abated using low-cost technologies, with the highest potential coming from eliminating unlit flaring and implementing leak detection and repair (LDAR) programs. The analysis highlights that the lack of a dedicated methane regulatory framework and low domestic gas prices hinder mitigation, while the EU Methane Regulation presents a significant external driver for alignment to maintain market access.

The document analyzes methane abatement in Egypt's oil and gas sector, identifying a technical abatement potential of 35% of estimated emissions using four key technologies. All analyzed measures fall below a low-cost threshold of 596 USD/t CH4, with leak detection and repair (LDAR) and the elimination of unlit flaring offering the most significant opportunities. The analysis highlights that the economic viability of these measures depends heavily on the ability to monetize recovered gas, which is currently hindered by infrastructure gaps and low domestic gas prices. While Egypt lacks a dedicated methane regulatory framework, the document notes a recent agreement to develop a methane reduction roadmap and recommends prioritizing low-cost measures like LDAR and flaring monitoring in the near term.

The document analyzes methane emissions in Libya's oil and gas sector, estimating annual emissions at 1,221 kt. It finds that 55% of these emissions can be abated using four specific technologies—leak detection and repair (LDAR), vapor recovery units (VRU), replacing gas-driven pneumatic equipment, and improving flaring practices—all of which fall below a low-cost threshold of 596 USD/t CH4. The largest potential for reduction comes from eliminating unlit flaring in the onshore upstream segment. However, implementation is hindered by the lack of a dedicated methane regulatory framework, aging infrastructure, and import restrictions on specialized equipment. The report highlights that the EU Methane Regulation poses a future risk to Libyan exports starting in 2027, urging the adoption of flaring performance standards and financial incentives to meet a 2030 zero-flaring ambition.

The document analyzes methane abatement in Mexico's oil and gas sector, finding that 34% of estimated emissions can be reduced using low-cost technologies. While Mexico has a robust regulatory framework, implementation is hindered by enforcement capacity and infrastructure gaps. The most significant abatement potential lies in improving offshore flaring practices, while midstream leak detection and repair (LDAR) can offer negative abatement costs due to the monetization of recovered gas.

The document analyzes methane abatement in Nigeria's oil and gas sector, focusing on four technologies: leak detection and repair (LDAR), vapor recovery units (VRU), replacement of natural gas-driven pneumatic equipment, and improved flaring practices. It finds that 30% of estimated emissions (53.5 Mt CO2e) are technically abatable using these technologies, with 28% falling below a low-cost threshold of 596 USD/t CH4. The analysis highlights that the economics of abatement depend heavily on the ability to monetize recovered gas, with some measures showing negative costs. While Nigeria has a regulatory framework targeting zero routine flaring by 2030, implementation is uneven, particularly between onshore and offshore assets. The report recommends strengthening enforcement, developing measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) systems, and utilizing targeted financial instruments like concessional loans to overcome barriers such as high import costs and infrastructure gaps.

The report evaluates methane abatement in Algeria, Angola, Argentina, Brazil, Egypt, Ghana, Libya, Mexico, and Nigeria, focusing on leak detection and repair (LDAR), vapor recovery units (VRUs), improved flaring practices, and replacing gas-driven pneumatic equipment. Using a bottom-up marginal abatement cost curve (MACC) approach, the study finds that most mitigation measures fall below a low-cost threshold of 596 USD/tCH4 (20 USD/tCO2e). The economic viability of these measures is heavily dependent on the ability to monetize recovered gas, with LDAR and pneumatic equipment replacement often yielding negative marginal costs (net savings) when gas prices are sufficiently high. The report identifies significant structural barriers, including infrastructure gaps and limited local technical capacity, and recommends a combination of regulatory frameworks, targeted financial incentives, and infrastructure investment to accelerate deployment.

The document analyzes methane abatement through improved flaring practices in nine African and Latin American countries. It identifies removing unlit flaring as a priority low-cost action and notes that while most measures fall below a low-cost threshold of 596 USD/tCH4, costs vary by country based on flaring volumes per site. Key barriers include regulatory focuses on flaring volumes rather than efficiency and high operation and maintenance requirements.

A joint letter from 54 organizations calling for an independent health impact assessment and the suspension of public financial support for LNG projects due to excessive flaring and emissions at the LNG Canada facility in Kitimat, BC.

The briefing examines the impact of energy supply disruptions stemming from the US-Iran war, noting that the current crisis is larger than the 1970s oil embargo. It argues that while governments are using short-term fixes like strategic reserves and subsidies, the long-term solution lies in electrification, demand-side efficiency, and the scaling of 'green molecules' like hydrogen and ammonia. The text highlights specific vulnerabilities in Southeast Asia and the US, and suggests that mitigating methane leakage and flaring could recover energy volumes equivalent to approximately half of worldwide LNG trade.

Nigeria wastes an estimated 250–300 million standard cubic feet per day of gas through flaring and leakage, representing an annual economic loss of USD 1.2–2.5 billion. The policy brief argues that capturing at least 50% of this wasted methane could unlock USD 1.5–2 billion in annual value and create 50,000–80,000 technical jobs. The proposed strategy focuses on a phased approach from 2026 to 2033, prioritising measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) and the conversion of methane into power, CNG, and micro-LNG. To succeed, the document recommends establishing a Methane Governance Council to resolve regulatory fragmentation and integrating the National Oil Spill Detection and Response Agency (NOSDRA) into the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) framework.

Nigeria wastes an estimated 250–300 million standard cubic feet per day (MMscfd) of gas through flaring and leakage, representing an annual loss of USD 1.2–2.5 billion. The policy brief argues that capturing and commercialising at least 50% of this wasted methane could unlock USD 1.5–2 billion in annual value, create 50,000–80,000 technical jobs, and improve public health by reducing ground-level ozone pollution. The proposed strategy focuses on existing and legacy infrastructure to avoid fossil fuel lock-in, utilizing low-cost measures like leak detection and repair (LDAR). Implementation is planned across three phases from 2026 to 2033, requiring a unified governance framework and robust measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV) systems to attract climate finance and carbon credits.

In 2025, Nigeria transitioned from policy ambition to implementation through the introduction of the National Integrated Electricity Policy, the launch of the Nigerian Climate Investment Platform, and the submission of its NDC 3.0. Key energy initiatives include the National Public Sector Solarisation Initiative and the Nigeria Electrification Project, while the Nigerian Gas Flaring Commercialisation Programme targets emissions reductions within the hydrocarbons sector.

In 2025, Nigeria transitioned from policy ambition to concrete implementation of its climate agenda through the introduction of the National Integrated Electricity Policy, the launch of the Nigerian Climate Investment Platform, and the submission of its NDC 3.0. Key energy initiatives include the National Public Sector Solarisation Initiative and the expansion of mini-grids via the Nigeria Electrification Project. The country also established a National Carbon Market Framework and advanced the Nigerian Gas Flaring Commercialisation Programme to reduce emissions while boosting power generation.

An analysis of Texas oil and gas data reveals that methane waste is significantly underreported, with estimates suggesting actual losses are 3 to 4.5 times higher than official figures. The study finds that venting is the primary source of underreporting, particularly in low-production oil wells where economic incentives discourage gas capture. The report argues that current self-reporting systems are insufficient and recommends disaggregated reporting and more stringent regulations to reduce environmental harm and recover lost tax revenues.

The Private Equity Stakeholder Project outlines five categories of climate standards for private markets investors: alignment with science-based targets, disclosure of fossil fuel exposure and emissions, the requirement for portfolio-wide energy transition plans, integration of environmental justice and community protections, and transparency regarding political spending and climate lobbying. The framework recommends specific timelines, such as phasing out coal power by 2030 and achieving a 4:1 ratio of low-carbon energy supply investments relative to fossil fuel investments by 2030.

Nigeria holds 33 percent of Africa's gas reserves and is implementing the 'Decade of Gas' (2021-2030) to transition toward a gas-powered economy. While the country is a top global LNG exporter, it faces significant internal challenges, including high gas flaring (188 Bcf in 2022), inadequate pipeline infrastructure, and poor payment discipline in the power sector. The document argues that natural gas can serve as a bridge fuel toward Nigeria's net-zero 2060 goal and a catalyst for African industrialization in sectors like fertilizers and petrochemicals. However, the global energy transition is leading International Oil Companies (IOCs) to divest from onshore assets, and geopolitical instability—specifically Niger's 2023 coup—threatens major cross-border projects like the Trans-Saharan Gas Pipeline.

The report analyzes methane abatement policies across various jurisdictions, including the US, Canada, EU, Mexico, Nigeria, Colombia, and Norway, while detailing technical requirements for controlling emissions from equipment such as pneumatic controllers, pumps, and storage tanks.

The briefing proposes a dual-metric approach to track methane emissions in the oil and gas sector, noting that a single metric cannot fairly assess the diverse physical and chemical makeups of petroleum resources. It highlights the economic viability of capturing wasted gas and calls for policy-driven demand to incentivize low-methane production.

Air pollution is the second deadliest risk for children under five globally, causing over 709,000 deaths in 2021. Children are more vulnerable due to developing immune systems and higher breathing rates. The burden is heavily skewed by economic disparity, with children in the least-developed countries facing death rates 94 times higher than those in the most-developed nations. The document highlights how structural lock-ins to fossil fuels and polluting land-use practices drive this crisis, noting that less than 1% of fossil fuel subsidies were spent on outdoor air quality between 2018 and 2022. Case studies in South Africa, Brazil, Nigeria, and Bangladesh illustrate the specific drivers—such as coal power, biomass burning, brick kilns, and oil extraction—that contribute to high child mortality and lifelong developmental impairments.