Search Climate Insights Directory

The report details a rapid threat identification methodology and the accompanying Fossil Fuel Atlas web platform, which allows stakeholders to overlay fossil fuel infrastructure data with environmental and social datasets. It argues that fossil fuel production drives ecological degradation through land conversion, pollution, and biodiversity loss, while also causing social harms such as the dispossession of Indigenous lands and health risks. The document provides a comprehensive taxonomy of these threats and demonstrates the tool's application through case studies in Western Africa, Egypt, Mozambique, South Africa, and the Philippines.

The 2022 ESMP for Sakteng Wildlife Sanctuary outlines mitigation strategies for three primary activities: the construction of a garage cum store, maintenance of the Sakteng Range office and water supply, and maintenance of the SWS Head Office and staff quarters. It provides a detailed baseline of the sanctuary's alpine and temperate ecosystems, socio-economic conditions of the Merak and Sakteng Gewogs, and rigorous occupational health and safety (OHS) standards for contracted workers.

The ESMP for Biological Corridor 7 (BC 7) outlines the environmental and social safeguards for the maintenance of a Beat office and Checkpost in 2022. It identifies the corridor's biodiversity, including 26 mammal and 162 bird species, and sets specific mitigation measures for waste management, water quality, and worker health and safety. The plan mandates compliance with WWF's Social Safeguards Integrated Policies and Procedures and national laws, ensuring local community engagement and strict occupational health and safety standards.

The Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) for Biological Corridor 5 (BC5) in Bhutan outlines mitigation strategies for two specific 2022 activities: the construction of a retaining wall in Pema Gatshel and an electric fence at Choegar Dhuedhuel Phodrang Monastery. The plan ensures compliance with both Royal Government of Bhutan (RGoB) laws and WWF's Social Safeguards Integrated Policies and Procedures (SIPP), with the latter prevailing in cases of discrepancy regarding land use rights and community consultation. It details baseline environmental conditions of BC5, which is primarily tropical broad-leaved forest, and provides comprehensive occupational health and safety (OHS) standards for workers.

The 2022 ESMP for Phrumsengla National Park (PNP) outlines the environmental and social safeguards for four planned activities: staff quarter maintenance, Trans-Bhutan Trail (TBT) maintenance, campsite construction at Gayzamchu, and solar/electric fencing installation. The plan identifies potential risks such as waste generation, noise pollution, and worker health and safety, providing specific mitigation measures and monitoring protocols. It also details the park's ecological baseline, including its role as a 'linchpin' of Bhutan's Biological Corridor Complex and its habitat for endangered species like the tiger and red panda.

The 2022 ESMP for Phibsoo Wildlife Sanctuary (PWS) outlines mitigation strategies for three primary activities: lowland grassland improvement, installation of a hybrid solar system at Phibsoo Outpost, and maintenance of the PWS headquarters. The plan ensures compliance with both Royal Government of Bhutan laws and WWF's Social Safeguards Integrated Policies and Procedures, prioritizing the latter in cases of discrepancy. PWS is noted for its high conservation value, serving as a habitat for globally threatened species like the golden langur and Asian elephant. The ESMP includes detailed occupational health and safety standards, monitoring frameworks, and stakeholder engagement records to minimize environmental degradation and social conflict.

The ESMP for Biological Corridor 2 (BC-02) outlines the environmental and social safeguards required for six planned activities in 2022, including road maintenance, bridge construction, and wildlife shelter expansion. It identifies potential risks such as noise pollution, waste generation, and occupational health and safety hazards, providing specific mitigation measures and monitoring frameworks. The plan ensures compliance with both Royal Government of Bhutan laws and WWF's Social Safeguards Integrated Policies and Procedures, prioritizing the latter in cases of discrepancy to ensure broader protection for non-title land users and community consultation.

The 2022 ESMP for Phrumsengla National Park (PNP) focuses on managing the environmental and social risks associated with the maintenance of staff quarters at the head office, Ura, and Phawan Range. The plan outlines baseline ecological conditions of the park—including its role as a watershed and habitat for endangered species like the tiger and red panda—and provides specific mitigation measures for waste, noise, air quality, and worker safety. Implementation is led by the BFL focal person in PNP, with monitoring conducted through field visits and monthly reports to ensure compliance with WWF and national safeguards.

The ESMP for Biological Corridor 6 (BC 6) outlines the environmental and social safeguards for three planned activities in 2022: the maintenance of Beat Offices at Khaling and Thrimshing, and the construction of a traditional painting house for the Tshendaling Community Forest (CF). The document provides a baseline of BC 6's biodiversity—including 46 mammal, 107 bird, and 393 plant species—and details mitigation measures for noise, air quality, waste, and worker safety. It mandates compliance with both Royal Government of Bhutan (RGoB) laws and WWF's Social and Environmental Safeguards Framework (SIPP), with the latter prevailing in cases of discrepancy regarding land use rights and community consultation.

The document analyzes the Jawa-7 project in Indonesia and the Hwange Expansion Project in Zimbabwe. It finds that while Indonesia's more robust regulatory framework and the use of ultra-supercritical technology limited some environmental impacts, Zimbabwe's lack of transparency and reliance on sub-critical technology led to severe pollution and community displacement. Both cases highlight a tension between national desires to exploit domestic coal reserves and international climate commitments, as well as persistent governance issues and a lack of transparency associated with Chinese-led infrastructure lending.

The document analyzes the ESG impacts of the Lamu Port in Kenya and the Kuantan Port in Malaysia, both developed under China's Belt and Road Initiative. It finds that both projects caused significant environmental damage, including the loss of mangroves in Kenya and pollution from bauxite mining in Malaysia. Socio-economic issues include unpaid compensation for displaced communities in Kenya and public health concerns in Malaysia. The briefing argues that these projects often prioritize political elite interests over pragmatic alternatives, leading to governance failures and questionable economic rationales.

The document examines the Bui Dam in Ghana and the Stung Tatay project in Cambodia, analyzing how ESG standards were applied. It finds that while Chinese firms led construction, the implementation of ESG standards was dominated by local actors, leading to outcomes that reflected the institutional capacities and transparency levels of the host governments. Both projects resulted in significant habitat destruction for endangered species and loss of local livelihoods, though Ghana exhibited higher levels of transparency and stakeholder engagement than Cambodia.

The document argues that offshore seismic surveying is fundamentally damaging to marine ecosystems and contradicts South Africa's COP26 commitments to transition from hydrocarbons to renewables. The authors highlight legal deficiencies in the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA) that allow these surveys to bypass full environmental impact assessments and criticize the outdated Environmental Management Programme (EMPr) used for Shell Oil's surveys off the Transkei Coast. They call for a halt to all planned surveys, a review of EIA regulations, and the commissioning of a Strategic Environmental Assessment for the South African Exclusive Economic Zone.

The 'Klimaatsaksie Handboek' is a practical guide designed to empower South African communities to combat climate change using legal tools. It explains the science of climate change, identifies specific vulnerabilities and potential impacts—such as water scarcity and food insecurity—and outlines a framework for 'climate action.' The document details South Africa's constitutional rights, relevant environmental legislation, and international commitments. It provides a step-by-step toolkit for community organizing, including methods for gathering evidence, accessing government information via PAIA, participating in Environmental Impact Assessments, lobbying, and taking legal action as a last resort.

The Climate Action Handbook is a guide designed to empower South African communities to respond to climate change by combining scientific understanding with legal action. It defines climate vulnerability and resilience, outlines South Africa's specific climate risks and legal framework—including constitutional rights and environmental legislation—and provides a ten-step practical framework for community-led climate action, ranging from advocacy and information gathering to formal legal proceedings.

The document examines how ESG standards are applied in Chinese-led hydropower projects in the Global South, contrasting the Bui Dam in Ghana and the Stung Tatay project in Cambodia. It finds that while Chinese contractors lead construction, the implementation of ESG standards is primarily the responsibility of local actors and recipient governments. In Cambodia, a lack of transparency and weak governance eroded public trust and left the actual impact of the Stung Tatay project unclear. In Ghana, the Bui Dam project benefited from higher transparency and stakeholder engagement, though it still suffered from failures in environmental mitigation and unfulfilled socioeconomic promises. Both cases demonstrate that institutional weaknesses in recipient governments can lead to poor ESG outcomes, creating reputational risks for Chinese contractors.

The report examines the Brazil's Federal Court of Accounts (TCU) as a key entity for risk management and preventive audits in federal land transport infrastructure. It finds that the TCU often becomes the primary body for approving Technical, Economical and Environmental Feasibility Studies (EVTEA), but typically does so too late in the project life cycle, leading to inefficiencies and wasted public resources. Through case studies of the BR-163/230/MT/PA highway, the North-South Railway (FNSTC), the South Integration Highway (RIS), and Ferrogrão, the document illustrates the TCU's role in defining environmental responsibilities and identifying flaws in feasibility studies, while maintaining a boundary that avoids infringing on the Executive Branch's discretionary power.

The document argues that infrastructure corruption, particularly 'grand corruption' occurring early in the project lifecycle, leads to oversized or unnecessary projects that cause irreversible ecological damage. It distinguishes between petty corruption, which typically has indirect conservation impacts, and grand corruption, which influences project scope and design for private gain. Using a lifecycle analysis (origination, feasibility/design, contracting/implementation, operation/maintenance, and evaluation/audit), the briefing identifies specific risks such as bribed environmental impact assessments and the circumvention of protections. It proposes anti-corruption strategies based on integrity, transparency, and accountability, recommending risk assessments and a combination of advocacy and direct action to improve conservation outcomes.

The policy brief examines the environmental and social costs of mining, the limitations of international and domestic governance, and the potential for public-private partnerships and the UN Sustainable Development Goals to create more sustainable mining practices.

The report finds that the Bargny-Sendou area already suffers from severe air pollution, with PM10 levels exceeding national standards by 193% to 540% before the full operation of new industrial projects. It argues that the cumulative impact of the coal plant, mineral port, and steel plant will exacerbate health risks and degrade local resources, including the livelihoods of 1,000 women processing fish at the Khelcom site. The study recommends a strategic environmental assessment of the zone and the conversion of the coal plant to gas.