Search Climate Insights Directory

The report analyzes 'Global Warming's Six Americas'—the Alarmed, Concerned, Cautious, Disengaged, Doubtful, and Dismissive—to determine if moral appeals from religious leaders could engage those currently unconcerned about climate change. It finds that while most Americans value caring for the poor and the environment, few outside the Alarmed and Concerned segments currently view global warming as a moral issue or understand its link to poverty. However, a widespread belief in human stewardship of nature and a general preference for religious over scientific explanations among less-engaged groups suggest that moral framing may be an effective communication strategy.

The report finds that while 73% of registered US voters believe global warming is happening, there is a significant divide between conservative Republicans and other political groups. Most voters support clean energy research and carbon regulation, and are more likely to vote for a presidential candidate who supports climate action than one who opposes it.

The report analyzes 'Global Warming's Six Americas'—segments ranging from the Alarmed to the Dismissive—to determine if moral framing by religious leaders can engage those currently unconcerned about climate change. It finds that while most Americans value caring for the poor and the environment, few outside the Alarmed and Concerned segments view global warming as a moral issue or understand its link to poverty. However, a widespread preference for religious over scientific explanations suggests that moral authority could reach skeptical audiences.

The document examines the psychological and social drivers of climate action, arguing that values, social norms, and trust are more influential than scientific knowledge alone. It provides strategic principles for communicators, emphasizing the need to avoid alarmism, tailor messages to specific audiences, and leverage trusted messengers to overcome political polarization and the 'information deficit' myth.

The SEI Initiative on Climate Services focuses on creating a Participatory Framework for Climate Services (PFCS) to better connect climate science with the practical needs of users, ranging from national governments to smallholder farmers. The initiative is structured around four work packages: understanding user needs, exploring collaborative co-generation processes, improving communication methodologies, and developing a community learning space via the weADAPT platform. It draws on interdisciplinary research and case studies from both industrialized and developing countries to ensure climate information is timely, relevant, and accessible.

The author acknowledges the Paris agreement's goal to limit global warming to less than 2 degrees and achieve 'net zero' emissions by the end of the century as a landmark diplomatic achievement. However, the text highlights critical gaps, noting that the final agreement contains no mentions of fossil fuels or specific plans to curtail their production. To bridge the gap between rhetoric and reality, the author advocates for a comprehensive public engagement strategy based on people's values and lived experiences rather than scientific data alone.

The text calls for rigorous, responsibility-driven journalism and better scientific communication to address the global challenge of climate change, warning against alarmism and the influence of financial lobbies.

The document addresses the challenge of communicating climate change during the aftermath of Storm Desmond in the UK. It argues that while immediate human tragedy takes priority, it is scientifically appropriate and necessary to link extreme rainfall to climate change to avoid 'starting from scratch' after every disaster. Based on a workshop with experts from Cardiff University and the ESRC, the text suggests that 'trusted peers' are the most effective messengers for affected communities and emphasizes the need to invest in 'social infrastructure' and climate literacy before disasters occur to build long-term resilience.

The report identifies a 'Francis Effect,' where American adults, particularly Catholics, became more engaged and concerned about global warming between spring and fall 2015. Key shifts include increased trust in the Pope as an information source, a greater perception of global warming as a moral and social justice issue, and heightened concern for the impact of climate change on the world's poor and developing nations. While support for unilateral U.S. emission reductions increased slightly, support for specific policies like carbon dioxide limits on coal plants remained stable or decreased slightly.

The report identifies a 'Francis Effect,' where Americans—particularly Catholics—became more engaged and concerned about global warming between spring and fall 2015. This shift is characterized by increased trust in the Pope, higher issue salience in media and places of worship, and a growing perception of global warming as a moral and social justice issue. While concern and certainty that global warming is happening increased, the report finds that understanding of human-caused warming remained steady and support for specific climate policies changed only slightly.

The document describes a research paper examining the extent to which the American public understands the negative health consequences of global warming and the factors influencing this awareness, including the impact of question formatting (open- versus closed-ended) on research findings.

The October 2015 survey indicates that 67% of Americans believe global warming is occurring, with 53% attributing it primarily to human activity. While worry about global warming increased between spring and fall 2015, pessimism regarding the ability to successfully reduce it is growing, with only 4% believing humans can and will succeed. A majority of Americans believe corporations, citizens, and the U.S. government should do more to address the issue. Additionally, the report identifies 'The Francis Effect,' noting that Pope Francis's teachings have specifically influenced the views and concerns of Catholic Americans.

The American public, particularly Catholics, shows a high level of receptivity to Pope Francis' climate message, with Catholics being more likely than other Christian groups to believe global warming is occurring and human-caused.

Research indicates that Pope Francis is generally viewed as a trusted source of information on global warming among Americans, with a majority (55%) believing it is appropriate for him to take a public position on the issue. Among American Christians, Catholics show higher levels of belief in human-caused global warming (57%) and higher levels of worry (57%) compared to other major Christian groups. While awareness of the papal encyclical on climate change remains low (31%), there is strong cross-denominational support for climate policies, including renewable energy research and carbon dioxide regulation.

The document outlines a research process to create trial narratives and framing language for a global multifaith climate campaign. This was achieved by analyzing interfaith statements, interviewing experts, and conducting narrative workshops and online surveys across Buddhist, Christian, Hindu, Jewish, and Muslim communities.

The report segments coastal Connecticut residents into five groups based on hurricane attitudes: the 'First Out', 'Constrained', 'Optimists', 'Reluctant', and 'Diehards'. It analyzes how risk perception, perceived barriers, and trust in authority influence evacuation decisions, noting that while local official orders are the most effective trigger for all groups, different segments require different interventions ranging from resource assistance to risk education.

The document finds that Catholic Republicans are more likely than non-Catholic Republicans to believe global warming is happening, attribute it to human activities, and support climate policies, a trend that persists even among conservative Republicans.

The document finds that Catholic Republicans in the U.S. are more likely than non-Catholic Republicans to believe global warming is happening and human-caused, to express worry about it, and to support climate policies. These differences persist even among conservative Republicans, whereas similar gaps are not observed among Democrats or Independents.

The report finds that public perception of global warming in the United States has remained stable, with 63% believing it is happening and 52% attributing it to human causes. Despite this, the issue is infrequently discussed in media and social circles, although the public maintains high trust in climate scientists, family, friends, and weather reporters.

A 2015 survey of US broadcast meteorologists reveals that over 90% believe climate change is occurring, with nearly 90% of those attributing it at least partly to human activity. While most believe climate change has influenced or will influence local weather, agriculture, and transportation, optimism regarding the ability to limit further change or avoid harmful impacts remains low. Additionally, nearly 70% of weathercasters believe it is appropriate to report climate science, and over 90% believe their audiences are at least somewhat interested in local climate impacts.