Search Climate Insights Directory

The We Mean Business Coalition describes the COP29 finance deal as insufficient, noting that the $300bn figure falls short of developing countries' needs. While the coalition views the 'Baku to Belém Roadmap' as a positive step for scaling public finance, it argues that the final agreement missed a leadership opportunity by omitting specific language on transitioning from fossil fuels. The coalition highlights that the global market for clean technologies is projected to exceed $2 trillion by 2035 and calls for 1.5°C-aligned Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) to mobilize private investment.

CAPE advocates for a rapid transition away from fossil fuels, citing severe health impacts from fracking and oil sands, the failure of industry-led emissions reductions, and the necessity of Indigenous reconciliation in climate action.

The We Mean Business Coalition calls on COP29 negotiators to reinforce the transition away from fossil fuels and implement Global Stocktake outcomes. The coalition argues that policy certainty and ambitious Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) are essential to unlock large-scale private investment in clean energy. Additionally, they advocate for a robust New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) on climate finance to support low- and middle-income countries and reduce investment risks.

Mighty Earth asserts that its theory of change is designed to withstand U.S. political shifts, noting that its core work on international nature protection and protein sector transformation relies more on the private sector than the U.S. government. While acknowledging risks to civil society and potential federal cuts to clean energy support, the organization emphasizes that economic incentives for decarbonization remain strong and plans to launch a North American rewilding program focused on state governments.

The Union of Concerned Scientists is launching a national campaign to protect government scientists and scientific research from political attacks, specifically citing the Project 2025 agenda as a source of intensified threats. The organization intends to combat disinformation, hold corporate actors accountable, and advance clean energy and democracy goals at the state level to mitigate federal-level risks to climate progress, transportation, and global security.

Clean Air Task Force asserts that U.S. climate progress can continue despite presidential pledges to roll back policies, citing the popularity of clean energy, the impact of the Inflation Reduction Act, and state-level commitments. The organization emphasizes that 60% of the U.S. (by sales and power emissions) is covered by zero-carbon pledges and that non-state actors can maintain leadership if the executive branch withdraws from global climate engagement.

The We Mean Business Coalition calls on G20 and COP29 leaders to establish a new collective quantified goal (NCQG) for climate finance and ensure 2035 nationally determined contributions (NDCs) are 'investible' through sector-specific targets and clear regulations. The coalition emphasizes that targeted public finance is essential to de-risk projects and unlock private investment, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, while noting that 260 businesses representing over $1.6 trillion are urging a fossil fuel phase-out.

The report details how Koch, Inc. and its executives had access to scientific warnings about global warming as early as 1972 but spent decades financing a network of nonprofits and think tanks to obstruct climate action. This was achieved by contesting climate science, running public relations campaigns to shift cultural understanding, and lobbying political elites. The document tracks this effort from early API and National Petroleum Council reports through the funding of the Competitive Enterprise Institute's 'global warming project' and the activities of Americans for Prosperity, culminating in significant policy victories during the Trump administration and continued opposition to Biden-era climate legislation.

The report updates a 2021 map of advanced nuclear projects, noting an increase from over 30 to nearly 80 demonstrations globally. While North America has seen significant commercial deals and licensing milestones, China and Russia lead in actual construction and operation. The authors argue that the U.S. must accelerate federal support for fuel supply and licensing to avoid falling further behind in a geopolitical and clean energy race.

The document contains a series of congressional remarks, including a specific recognition of the Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI) on its 40th anniversary. Representative Emanuel Cleaver highlights EESI's history since the 1970s, its mission to provide objective information on climate and clean energy to Congressional staff, and its role in organizing the annual Congressional Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency EXPO and Policy Forum.

Representative Chrissy Houlahan issued a statement in the Congressional Record congratulating the Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI) on its 40th anniversary. She highlights EESI's role as a nonpartisan partner to the bipartisan Climate Solutions Caucus, providing science-based resources on topics such as carbon sequestration, natural climate solutions, and the Farm Bill to help policymakers develop durable climate legislation.

Representative Jennifer L. McClellan issued a statement in the Congressional Record recognizing the 40th anniversary of the Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI). She highlighted EESI's role since 1984 as an independent nonprofit providing members of Congress and staff with nonpartisan, science-based educational resources on climate, clean energy, and environmental topics. McClellan noted that EESI's resources assist congressional offices in serving constituents and mentioned her own participation in EESI's podcast, 'The Climate Conversation', to discuss environmental justice, public health impacts of the climate crisis, and community resilience.

The document advises journalists to move beyond describing fracking as 'controversial' and instead explain its specific climate and health impacts. It highlights that fracking accounts for nearly two-thirds of US oil production and argues that its methane emissions make it more damaging to the climate than coal. The guide also emphasizes the importance of reporting on state-level regulation and the need for a just transition for fossil-fuel-dependent communities.

The guide argues that businesses can avoid political polarization by framing climate action as a 'material' business necessity rather than a 'moral' obligation. Based on research with nearly 15,000 respondents, it finds that while moral messaging can increase favorability, it also increases unfavorability among skeptics. In contrast, framing climate action through risk management, clean energy opportunity, and the concept of 'responsible business' drives favorability without triggering backlash. The document specifically recommends replacing jargon like 'ESG' with 'responsible business' and 'climate change risk' with 'climate risk' to improve resonance with diverse audiences, including U.S. Republicans.

The report finds that while CETP signatories have significantly reduced international public finance for fossil fuels, they have failed to scale up clean energy investment at a comparable rate.

The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) has driven significant clean energy investment and job growth in the US, particularly in Republican-led areas, despite political efforts to repeal it and general public unfamiliarity with the law's specific provisions.

The report compares a pathway aligned with U.S. climate commitments against the energy and climate provisions of Project 2025. It finds that Continued Climate Leadership would lead to significant emissions reductions, job growth, and public health improvements, while Project 2025 would increase emissions, reduce GDP, and cause additional premature deaths.

The document outlines four primary areas for federal sustainable jobs policies to support Indigenous Peoples in Canada: advancing joint governance, supporting Indigenous-specific definitions of sustainable jobs, enabling equity through flexible funding and procurement, and scaling up workforce capacity through education and wrap-around supports.

The document argues that Canada's Sustainable Jobs Act must intentionally advance Indigenous self-determination to address socio-economic inequities and the legacy of fossil fuel extraction. It proposes four action pathways: joint governance and co-design, supporting Indigenous-specific definitions of sustainable jobs, enabling Indigenous equity and ownership, and scaling up workforce capacity building. These recommendations are grounded in the experience of Indigenous Clean Energy (ICE) programs, such as the 20/20 Catalysts Program and Generation Power, which emphasize wrap-around supports and mentorship for Indigenous youth.

The briefing analyzes how the Energy Permitting Reform Act of 2024 (EPRA) and FERC Order 1920 could accelerate US transmission expansion to 2–4 TW-miles per year. By enabling the deployment of clean energy to meet growing electricity demand and displace fossil fuel generation, these provisions are estimated to reduce cumulative US grid emissions by 6.5 Gt CO2e through 2050. The analysis focuses on four key EPRA sections addressing interregional planning, FERC permitting, categorical exclusions, and legal decision timelines.