Search Climate Insights Directory

A group of Brazilian and international organizations opposes the approval of Plantar S.A.'s CDM project, "Cultivated Biomass as a Renewable Source of Energy for Pig Iron Production". The authors argue that the project lacks additionality because the company has already been planting eucalyptus since 2000 and that the operations cause significant environmental degradation and social injustices, including the displacement of indigenous and peasant communities.

The report examines the intersection of biomass, livelihoods, and international trade, focusing on the trade axis between the European Union and the Southern African Development Community (SADC). It highlights the growth of North-South trade in bioenergy, particularly liquid biofuels like bio-ethanol and biodiesel, driven by EU commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in transport. The document weighs the potential for economic growth and livelihood creation against risks of environmental degradation and economic exploitation, ultimately offering recommendations for future research, policy, and capacity building rather than definitive conclusions.

The paper explores using revenues from the sale of Bulgaria's surplus Assigned Amount Units (AAUs) to fund a Green Investment Scheme (GIS). It focuses on bioenergy, arguing that Bulgaria's underutilized biomass resources could support large-scale fuel switching from electricity and oil to wood-based heating. The authors propose a 'programmatic approach' to overcome the high transaction costs that hindered similar projects under Joint Implementation (JI). Financial assessments suggest mitigation costs for municipal building fuel switches could be as low as 12.7 Euro per tonne of CO2 reduced, while household switches would cost between 24.9 and 30.2 Euro per tonne.

The report examines how Romania can use a Green Investment Scheme (GIS) to invest proceeds from the sale of approximately 100 million surplus Assigned Amount Units (AAUs) into climate-related projects. It specifically evaluates land-use activities, such as the reforestation of 'cut-not-regenerated' forests and fast-growing woody crops, and bioenergy projects, including the rehabilitation of district heating systems. The analysis compares GIS with Joint Implementation (JI), arguing that GIS is better suited for land-use projects due to lower transaction costs, more flexible monitoring, and the ability to address high upfront investments and delayed returns.

The document assesses Ghana's progress in renewable energy (RE) and energy efficiency (EE), highlighting a government target of 10% RE in the energy mix by 2020. It identifies significant barriers, including the lack of a comprehensive legal framework, high upfront capital costs, and a pricing system that ignores environmental externalities. The author argues that international cooperation—through capacity building, credit support facilities, and the Clean Development Mechanism—is essential to accelerate the transition to a low-carbon economy and improve rural electrification.

The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) warns that using food crops like corn and soybeans for biofuels increases food prices, degrades ecosystems, and can raise global warming pollution through land conversion. The UCS advocates for a shift toward 'better' biofuels derived from waste or non-food biomass, supported by a low-carbon fuel standard and performance-based public funding. While the 2007 Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) provides a foundation by requiring pollution reductions from new facilities, the UCS argues for broader sustainability criteria to prevent deforestation and protect biodiversity.

The report examines the domestic contexts of Ukraine and Kazakhstan regarding clean energy investment. It identifies a shared legacy of high energy intensity and a common struggle with corruption, bureaucracy, and insufficient legal frameworks. While both countries possess significant renewable potential, they remain heavily reliant on conventional sources—Ukraine on nuclear and imported gas, and Kazakhstan on domestic coal and oil. The study highlights that the lack of market-based incentives, such as feed-in tariffs, and low electricity prices are primary obstacles to private investment. It also analyzes the role of the Kyoto Protocol's Joint Implementation (JI) mechanism as a potential financial driver, noting Ukraine's relative success in this area compared to Kazakhstan's delayed ratification process.

The document advocates for amending the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 to include federal forest residues as eligible feedstocks for the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS). It argues that utilizing these materials would provide a sustainable source of cellulosic biofuels without the indirect greenhouse gas emissions associated with agricultural land displacement. Furthermore, the author contends that creating markets for small-diameter trees through the RFS would make hazardous fuel reduction and forest restoration more cost-effective, reducing the risk of catastrophic wildfires and improving ecosystem health.

The Production Tax Credit (PTC) provides financial incentives for renewable energy facilities in the U.S., offering 2.3 cents per kWh for wind, geothermal, and closed-loop bioenergy, and 1.1 cents per kWh for other technologies. While the PTC has driven significant wind capacity growth and cost reductions, the document argues that Congress's pattern of allowing the credit to expire and then granting short-term extensions has created a 'boom-bust cycle' that jeopardizes financing, jobs, and long-term development.

Biopower generates electricity by burning carbohydrates in biomass that captured solar energy via photosynthesis. While some studies suggest limited economic potential for biopower in the U.S. due to high costs, others indicate that advanced technologies using low-carbon feedstocks could contribute up to 15 percent of U.S. electricity generation by mid-century. However, the technology carries risks including unsustainable harvesting, ecosystem damage, air pollution, and potential net global warming emissions, necessitating a lifecycle carbon emissions analysis for proper assessment.

Between 1997 and 2006, fossil fuel consumption in the Southeast grew by approximately 14 percent, significantly exceeding both the national average growth rate of 5 percent and the regional growth of non-fossil energy sources, which was less than 1 percent.

Jonathan Lash, representing the US Climate Action Partnership (US CAP), advocates for a federal cap-and-trade program and a long-term emissions roadmap to transition the United States to a low-carbon economy. He emphasizes that clear federal rules are necessary to avoid a regulatory patchwork of state laws and to provide the market certainty required for large-scale private investment in clean energy technologies.

The House and Senate both proposed significantly higher funding for DOE Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EE/RE) programs for FY 2008 than the Administration's request. The House bill (H.R. 2641) appropriated $1.98 billion, while the Senate bill (S. 1751) appropriated $1.72 billion. Both legislative bodies restored funding for geothermal energy and hydropower, which the Administration had eliminated, and increased budgets for solar, wind, and biomass R&D. Additionally, both the House and Senate increased funding for fossil fuel R&D while appropriating less than the Administration's request for nuclear power.

The Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI) argues that the 2007 Farm Bill should transition agriculture policy to treat renewable energy as a core component. The report identifies a gap between the authorization of programs in the 2002 Farm Bill and the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and the actual appropriations provided. It recommends expanded funding for biomass research, the creation of a national biomass assessment, and incentives for small-scale, farmer-owned biorefineries to ensure rural economic benefits. Additionally, it proposes enhancing federal procurement of biobased products and implementing a Renewable Portfolio Standard of 25 percent by 2025.

The document outlines three primary methods for companies to obtain green power: retail green power programs, renewable energy certificates (RECs), and on-site generation. It provides a business case for the transition, focusing on GHG reduction, stakeholder relations, and cost stability. The guide also details procurement strategies to minimize premiums, such as energy efficiency upgrades and demand aggregation, and explains the methodology for accounting for carbon benefits in corporate GHG inventories using e-GRID emission factors.

The document argues that the World Bank's energy investment framework is a continuation of 'more of the same', failing to transition from fossil fuels to renewables. It highlights a contradiction where the Bank acts as a major carbon trader while continuing to fund projects that emit massive amounts of greenhouse gases. The report criticizes the Bank's promotion of 'clean coal', nuclear energy, and large dams, asserting these technologies cause significant environmental and social harm. It calls for a redirection of public finance from the North to the South toward decentralized renewable energy and energy efficiency to meet the needs of the world's poor.

The report details a March 2006 workshop in Arusha, Tanzania, involving 48 stakeholders to identify interventions for four EAC energy access targets. The primary findings emphasize the need for decentralized planning at district and municipal levels, increased regional cooperation to share costs, and the development of public-private partnerships. The workshop resulted in 14 recommendations adopted by the EAC Council of Ministers and Heads of State in April 2006, focusing on harmonizing energy policies, mobilizing resources, and mainstreaming energy access into national planning frameworks.

The paper discusses engineering strategies to mitigate climate change, focusing on energy production shifts, technical efficiency, and social changes, while analyzing the ethical risks of nuclear power and carbon capture.

The report examines the shift of tax burdens from labour to consumption and natural resource use, known as Ecological Tax Reform (ETR). It analyzes how EU nations have used energy, transport, and pollution taxes to internalize environmental costs while maintaining economic competitiveness. The document highlights that successful ETRs often combine tax increases on pollutants with reductions in social security or income taxes, creating a 'double dividend' of environmental improvement and increased employment. Based on these international experiences, the report suggests that Estonia should phase out subsidies for its oil-shale energy sector, introduce carbon-based energy taxes, and implement differentiated vehicle taxes to stimulate resource efficiency and sustainable development.

The document records a multi-sector call for a U.S. transition to clean energy, arguing that government investment and regulation can simultaneously drive economic growth, reduce oil dependence, and address climate change.