Search Climate Insights Directory

ClientEarth proposes a 'methane reduction alliance' consisting of the world's largest gas importers—including the EU, Japan, South Korea, the UK, and China—to implement a performance standard that caps and reduces methane emissions in the gas supply chain. The proposal argues that by prioritizing gas purchases from countries with similar regulations and applying fees to emissions exceeding the standard, importing nations can drive global methane abatement. The report highlights that capturing wasted methane could provide nearly 210 billion cubic metres of gas, offering a way to bolster supply without expanding gas fields. It also critiques voluntary industry schemes for lacking independent verification and failing to include national oil companies, which hold over half of global gas assets.

The report examines the bioeconomy in Brazil and the Amazon through three conceptual lenses: biotechnology, bioresources, and bioecology. It finds that while Brazil possesses a broad set of regulations covering these areas, it lacks a unified national strategy and coordinated governance. The analysis highlights that the 'various Amazons'—conserved, deforested, under pressure, and urban—require different bioeconomy approaches. Key regulatory tensions exist within the Biodiversity Law, which is viewed as too bureaucratic by the biotechnology sector and insufficient in protecting traditional knowledge by bioecology advocates. The report concludes that effective governance must integrate multiple ministries and prioritize land tenure regularization to ensure sustainability and legal security.

The report assesses the private debt landscape in Africa, noting that while the market is growing, it remains heavily dominated by Development Finance Institutions (DFIs) and Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs), primarily in hard currency. It highlights a significant gap in local institutional investor participation due to regulatory constraints, risk aversion, and a lack of local currency vehicles. The study provides detailed analysis of focus markets—Nigeria, Kenya, Ghana, and Morocco—and uses South Africa as a reference for a more developed financial sector. Key recommendations include the introduction of credit enhancement facilities, improved data transparency, and the creation of local currency investment vehicles to reduce foreign exchange risk for borrowers and attract domestic pension funds.

ClientEarth proposes four key reforms to the REACH regulation: requiring full data for market access, simplifying and accelerating the restriction of hazardous chemicals, incentivizing companies that transition to safe alternatives, and enhancing enforcement and transparency to ensure compliance.

The document identifies a dilemma in India's financial system where increasing green finance is perceived to raise credit risk, while strict risk management may constrain green capital flows. It argues that current frameworks, including Basel III, do not adequately factor in climate-related financial risks. To bridge the investment gap—estimated at USD 170 billion per annum—the report recommends a three-pillar approach: policy interventions (such as carbon pricing and green government securities), regulatory prescriptions (including modified risk weights and carbon ratings), and market mechanisms (such as standardized disclosure frameworks and capacity building).

ClientEarth argues that the European Commission's proposed amendments to the Solvency II Directive are insufficient to manage climate-related risks. The organization recommends requiring insurers to model extreme warming (3°C+) and disorderly transition scenarios over a minimum 30-year period. It further advocates for 'double materiality' in risk management to account for the environmental impact of underwriting and calls for fast-tracking EIOPA's analysis of capital requirements for fossil fuels to mitigate systemic financial risks.

ClientEarth and the European Environmental Bureau (EEB) have expressed serious concerns regarding the European Commission's revision of the State aid Guidelines on climate, environmental protection and energy (CEEAG). They argue that the Commission is favoring energy intensive users (EIUs) by potentially expanding aid eligibility to companies only 'at risk' of carbon leakage, rather than those at 'significant risk'. The authors contend that the risk of carbon leakage remains 'unproven' and that maintaining reductions in electricity levies for EIUs contradicts the European Green Deal and the Polluter Pays Principle. They advocate for 'Option E2' (the ETS list), which would restrict aid to 14 eligible sectors, resulting in an estimated 89% annual budget reduction and 'much lower competition distortions'. Additionally, the letter criticizes the Commission's governance, alleging a breach of EU jurisprudence by failing to make impact assessments publicly accessible before adopting proposals.

The report investigates the potential for municipal green bonds to support Indonesia's goal of 23% renewable energy by 2025. While provincial governments in Java and Bali generally meet fiscal eligibility criteria, no municipal bonds have been successfully issued as of 2021. Key barriers include complex bureaucratic procedures, a lack of profitable project pipelines, and a conservative investor market primarily motivated by credit ratings and commercial returns rather than green mandates. The authors recommend simplifying issuance requirements, providing clearer central government policy signals, and targeting quasi-government institutions as initial investors.

The policy brief analyzes the gap between international guidelines, sectoral manuals, and the actual implementation of environmental studies for land infrastructure in the Legal Amazon. It finds that studies prioritize socio-economic and physical factors over the biotic environment, often fail to comply with their own terms of reference, and lack coordination between the EVTEA and EIA phases. The authors recommend making EVTEAs mandatory before EIAs, incorporating international standards into binding terms of reference, and establishing transparent approval criteria to reduce environmental risks and transaction costs.

The analysis reveals that environmental studies for federal land infrastructure in the Legal Amazon prioritize socio-economic and physical factors over the biotic environment. It finds a lack of coordination between EVTEAs and EIAs, with only 30% of EIA components appearing in EVTEAs, and notes that studies frequently fail to comply with their own terms of reference (TRs) or sectoral manuals. The brief recommends incorporating international guidelines into TRs and making EVTEAs mandatory before EIAs to improve project viability and environmental protection.

The document analyzes 14 large-scale railroad and highway projects in the Legal Amazon, finding significant gaps in the viability phase. Key issues include the lack of a mandatory sequence between Technical, Economic and Environmental Viability Studies (EVTEA) and Environmental Impact Studies (EIA), and a severe lack of transparency, with 57% of essential documents unavailable. The authors recommend mandating that EVTEA precede EIA to identify risks earlier and establishing a centralized database for all concession documents.

The policy brief examines 14 federal railway and highway concession projects in the Legal Amazon, finding significant procedural uncertainty and a lack of transparency. It highlights the absence of a mandatory sequence between Technical, Economic, and Environmental Viability Studies (EVTEA) and Environmental Impact Studies (EIA), which delays the identification of socio-environmental risks. Additionally, 57% of key documents for these projects were unavailable, hindering monitoring and investor risk assessment. The authors recommend mandating that EVTEAs precede EIAs and centralizing project data in a transparent database.

The report examines the rise of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) regulations to combat greenwashing, highlighting the EU's Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) as a key driver. It argues that ESG-aligned funds are outperforming non-aligned ones, making ESG compliance essential for accessing global capital. This shift poses a significant risk to fossil fuel-dependent firms, especially in Africa, while benefiting those providing minerals for renewable energy, provided they adhere to genuine sustainability principles.

The document outlines the structure of South Africa's public water sector, which spent R 41.5 billion on infrastructure procurement in the 2019/2020 financial year. It details the roles of entities like the Department of Human Settlements, Water and Sanitation (DHSWS) and Water Services Authorities (WSAs), and explains the predominantly used design-bid-build procurement model. The guide provides a comprehensive breakdown of bidding requirements, including B-BBEE compliance and the necessity of registering on the Central Supplier Database. It also highlights the importance of strategic partnerships to overcome bidding barriers and lists available platforms for trialling innovative water technologies.

ClientEarth argues that the EU is overinvesting in methane gas infrastructure and urges the Commission to implement a methane product standard by 2025 to integrate climate costs into gas prices. The document recommends that public financial support for methane gas or gas-derived hydrogen be precluded or strictly conditioned on carbon capture and storage (CCS) and lifecycle emission caps. It further calls for institutional reform to ensure independent energy system planning, the prioritisation of energy efficiency over new infrastructure, and the cessation of the term 'natural gas' to avoid greenwashing.

The document assesses Thailand's air quality challenges, noting that while numerous Acts and Plans exist, enforcement is hampered by a siloed ministerial approach and a prioritization of economic growth over environmental health. It identifies key pollution sources including road transport, coal-fired power plants, industrial zones, and seasonal crop burning. The paper highlights successful past initiatives such as the phase-out of leaded gasoline and two-stroke motorcycles, and suggests the need for an overarching national agency to integrate air quality management across sectors.

ClientEarth argues that current EU Food Contact Materials (FCM) regulations fail because they treat symptoms rather than root causes, specifically citing a mismatch between regulatory tools and goals, a lack of clear accountability in the supply chain, and an over-reliance on self-regulation. The organization advocates for 'Option 2' from the Commission's Roadmap—a full regulatory overhaul—which would shift responsibility to the manufacturer or importer of the final product, align FCM rules with food contaminant and chemical laws (REACH/CLP), and introduce a more holistic approach incorporating life-cycle sustainability and stricter enforcement mechanisms, including NGO access to documentation and GDPR-inspired sanctions.

The South African small scale embedded generation (SSEG) market, dominated by rooftop solar PV, has grown to over 100,000 systems (over 1GW) as of 2020. However, market growth is hindered by an indistinct regulatory landscape and stakeholder uncertainty regarding licensing and registration. The document outlines a tiered regulatory framework based on capacity: systems under 100kW generally do not require NERSA registration (provided local utility conditions are met), those between 100kW and 1MW require NERSA registration, those between 1MW and 10MW require licensing, and those over 10MW require both licensing and ministerial determination. It emphasizes that all grid-connected generation must be registered with the relevant transmission or distribution grid operator, and for systems between 100kW and 1MW, a connection application to the distributor must precede the NERSA registration application.

The document outlines the regulatory requirements for embedded generation in South Africa, specifically focusing on the transition to a 100 MW license-exempt threshold. It details the two-phase process involving connection approval from a licensed distributor (municipality or Eskom) followed by registration with the National Energy Regulator of South Africa (NERSA).

The document provides a guide for businesses in South Africa to evaluate waste-to-energy (WtE) options, categorising technologies into anaerobic digestion, thermal processes, and biofuels. It outlines the regulatory landscape, including the National Environmental Management: Waste Act and NERSA regulations, and highlights upcoming policy shifts such as organic waste landfill bans in the Western Cape. The brief emphasizes a structured project development process—from scoping and pre-feasibility to execution—to ensure financial and technical viability.