Search Climate Insights Directory

Ember proposes a comprehensive overhaul of European grid policy, arguing that electricity grids should be treated as strategic infrastructure for economic growth. Key recommendations include establishing a 'one-stop-shop' for financing, mandating independent and integrated infrastructure planning across energy carriers, and extending national planning horizons to 20 years. The briefing also advocates for a shift toward TOTEX-based regulatory approaches to incentivise flexibility and grid-enhancing technologies (GETs), alongside the standardisation of data sharing between transmission and distribution system operators to improve visibility of distributed assets and grid capacity.

Southwestern Pennsylvania is positioned to diversify its economy by establishing cleantech clusters, specifically in battery manufacturing, solar components, and green buildings, by utilizing its legacy in steel, glass, and robotics. While the region has existing strengths and some active companies, it requires better coordination through a dedicated cleantech cluster initiative and targeted workforce development in specialized engineering roles to compete with other regions and attract investment.

A coalition of 15 NGOs calls on EU fisheries ministers to align 2026 Baltic fishing opportunities with the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) to ensure fish populations remain above biomass levels capable of producing the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) and to protect ecosystem health.

The document identifies fundamental shortcomings in the scientific advice provided by the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) regarding fishing opportunities in the EU and UK. It asserts that current advice and the requests guiding it do not fully align with legal requirements and policy goals. The authors call on EU and UK decision-makers to request that ICES clarify these shortcomings, address identified issues, and provide interim recommendations to ensure fisheries decisions effectively support stock recovery and ocean health.

Carbon Market Watch recommends that Zambia's 2025 Carbon Market Regulations include more robust quantitative criteria for greenhouse gas uncertainty, mandatory independent grievance processes, and a minimum activity longevity of 100 years for land-use projects to ensure climate-relevant timescales. The organization also advocates for mandatory benefit-sharing for all activities affecting local communities and the adoption of high-quality methodology labels, such as Article 6.4 or ICVCM's CCP, over CDM or VCS standards.

The research paper outlines the challenges facing African development finance, including a significant annual financing gap and the 'African premium' on international capital markets. It argues that the G20 common framework for sovereign debt restructuring has failed African countries and proposes that South Africa's G20 presidency prioritise the creation of a Borrowers' Forum, the improvement of sovereign debt architecture via the Global Sovereign Debt Roundtable, and the appointment of a G20 panel of technical experts to address barriers to affordable finance.

The World Association for Christian Communication (WACC) highlights a critical financing gap in achieving global digital justice and inclusion. Following the WSIS+20 High Level Event, the document notes that rising debt in developing countries and cuts in international development finance hinder sustainable digital development. WACC proposes four strategies to address this: taxing digital corporations, linking digital governance with development finance frameworks, increasing national public investment, and mobilizing diverse funding sources from philanthropic and private sectors.

The report examines the role of state-owned power companies (SPCs) in driving clean energy transitions within emerging markets. It highlights that while SPCs can advance energy security and socio-economic development, they often face significant debt and capital mobilization challenges. The document argues for a combination of visionary leadership, legal frameworks, shifted public finance from fossil fuels to clean energy, and innovative international financing tied to decarbonization progress. Through case studies of Eskom, NTPC, Vietnam Electricity (EVN), and Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PLN), the report analyzes specific transition elements including just energy transition, renewable energy deployment, grid integration, and coal plant retirement.

Carbon Market Watch argues that the proposed CLEAR Methodology for Cooking Energy Transitions contains shortcomings and optionalities that risk overcrediting. The organization recommends replacing arbitrary downward adjustments for the Hawthorne effect with scientific evidence, adopting a conservative 4:1 wood-to-charcoal conversion factor, and implementing the annual downward baseline adjustments required by the Paris Agreement Crediting Mechanism (PACM) Standard. Additionally, it suggests increasing the default leakage adjustment factor to 5%, updating fraction of non-renewable biomass (fNRB) values more frequently, and strengthening additionality testing by lowering the common practice threshold to 20%.

The June–July 2025 heatwave in Europe increased electricity demand by up to 14% and caused average daily power prices to double or triple in several countries. While record solar generation of 45 TWh in June 2025 helped maintain daytime stability, the heatwave triggered thermal power plant outages, particularly affecting France's nuclear fleet. The report argues for the deployment of battery storage, interconnection, and demand flexibility to mitigate future extreme weather risks.

The report advocates for a technology-inclusive energy strategy for Germany to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050. It argues that relying solely on weather-dependent renewables leads to higher system costs, price volatility, and infrastructure bottlenecks. The author proposes an 'options-based portfolio' including nuclear energy, carbon capture and storage (CCS), clean hydrogen, fusion, and superhot rock geothermal energy. Key recommendations include restarting nuclear plants, prioritising clean hydrogen for hard-to-abate industrial sectors, and implementing the EU Methane Regulation to reduce potent greenhouse gas emissions.

The document highlights the increasing frequency and severity of wildfires in Canada, emphasizing that current support systems are strained. It calls for the full implementation of the National Adaptation Strategy, modernization of infrastructure, and a change in financial aid to prioritize preparation over intervention. The author notes that adaptation is critical for economic security, citing that every dollar invested in adaptation can save up to 15 dollars in avoided costs.

The Canadian Climate Institute calls for the urgent implementation of the National Adaptation Strategy and a whole-of-society approach to disaster preparedness. It highlights that municipal and Indigenous governments face disproportionate impacts and capacity constraints, while vulnerable public infrastructure increases economic risks. The document asserts that proactive investment in adaptation can yield significant economic benefits, with a potential 15-to-1 return on investment.

The document argues that current fishing opportunities are often set above scientific advice, perpetuating overfishing in the Baltic, Northeast Atlantic, and Mediterranean. It recommends setting Total Allowable Catches (TACs) well below the 'headline' scientific advice from ICES and STECF to account for ecosystem dynamics and climate change. The authors highlight shortcomings in current scientific advice, noting it lacks concrete recovery timeframes and ecological objectives. Key proposals include implementing a quantitative precautionary approach to TAC-setting, increasing transparency in negotiations, and fully enforcing the Landing Obligation.

The document argues that many fish populations not managed by a Total Allowable Catch (TAC) have been exploited unsustainably, despite legal requirements in the EU and UK to apply precautionary and ecosystem-based approaches to all harvested species. It calls for the introduction of effective management measures for all non-TAC stocks, the use of Remote Electronic Monitoring (REM) to improve data, and the implementation of clear criteria for the prohibited species list. Specific urgent actions are recommended for the European eel, including adding it to the prohibited species list and stopping all targeted fishing, and for sea bass, including limiting catches below headline scientific advice to ensure recovery.

The briefing argues that deep-sea fish populations in European waters are either depleted or lack sufficient data for assessment, making them exceptionally vulnerable to over-exploitation due to slow growth and late maturation. It criticizes EU and UK ministers for setting fishing opportunities above precautionary scientific advice from ICES and STECF. The document recommends setting fishing opportunities below single-stock advice, implementing zero-catch Total Allowable Catches (TACs) for endangered species like roundnose grenadier, and enhancing the protection of Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems (VMEs). It emphasizes that these measures are necessary to meet obligations under the EU deep-sea fisheries Regulation 2016/2336, the UK Fisheries Act, and UN General Assembly standards.

The document advocates for a shift from single-stock fisheries management to an ecosystem-based approach in the EU and UK. It argues that current scientific advice from ICES and STECF often fails to account for the needs of predators and the impacts of climate change. The authors recommend setting Total Allowable Catches (TACs) below headline scientific advice to rebuild fish populations well above sustainable levels (BMSY) and to safeguard the food web, particularly for forage fish like sandeel, sprat, and herring.

The document argues that EU and UK fisheries management has historically prioritized profitable stocks over vulnerable ones, leading to a cycle of overfishing and 'choking'—where fisheries must stop operating because they run out of quota for less abundant species despite having quota for target stocks. To break this cycle, the authors recommend that Total Allowable Catches (TACs) for abundant stocks be set below single-stock scientific advice to protect bycatch, and that decision-makers utilize mixed fishery MSY considerations from ICES geared toward rebuilding depleted populations. Additional proposed measures include implementing spatial closures, mandating Remote Electronic Monitoring (REM) for full catch documentation, and requiring the use of the best available technology to improve gear selectivity.

The document highlights widespread non-compliance with the landing obligation (LO) in the EU and UK, noting that illegal discarding remains 'prolific' and undermines stock assessments. It argues that setting Total Allowable Catches (TACs) based on catch advice while illegal discarding continues allows for unsustainable fishing levels. To remedy this, the authors recommend the swift roll-out of Remote Electronic Monitoring (REM), setting TACs lower than ICES maximum catch advice in the absence of robust controls, and making quota 'top-ups' conditional on demonstrated vessel compliance. The briefing also suggests using precautionary multipliers in catch accounting to incentivise selectivity and promoting quota redistribution to avoid raising overall TACs.

The document argues that EU and UK fisheries management has failed to rebuild depleted fish stocks, often exceeding scientific advice to avoid short-term economic disruptions. It highlights the risk of 'phantom recoveries' where stock assessments overestimate productivity. To break the cycle of overfishing and 'choke' risks in mixed fisheries, the authors recommend setting Total Allowable Catches (TACs) strictly in line with scientific advice, implementing rigorous rebuilding plans with remote electronic monitoring, and reducing TACs for healthy stocks to protect depleted bycatch species.