Search Climate Insights Directory

The document provides a historical analysis of the military forces in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, beginning with the Force Publique under King Léopold II and continuing through the Zairian Armed Forces (FAZ) under President Mobutu. It details the systemic politicisation, tribalisation, and de-professionalisation of the army during the Mobutu era, which led to a breakdown in civil-military relations. The text further examines the conflicts involving the AFDL and the 'First African World War,' culminating in the Inter-Congolese Dialogue and the subsequent efforts to integrate government and rebel forces into a restructured, apolitical national army under the 2003 constitution.

The document examines how corruption in the oil, gas, and mining sectors in Africa leads to significant wealth loss through illicit financial flows, tax avoidance, and transfer pricing. It identifies a lack of state capacity, bureaucratic discretion, and political will as primary drivers of these failures. While various international and regional initiatives exist, the author argues they are often ineffective due to low administrative capacity and a focus on 'grand' corruption over systemic issues. The paper highlights Botswana as a successful model of natural resource governance and provides twelve recommendations for technical and institutional capacity building to combat corruption.

The document assesses the South African prison system's crisis of overcrowding and funding, arguing that while prison privatisation is controversial, it may be the only viable means of reforming deteriorating government services. It analyzes the 'design, construction, finance and management' (DCFM) model, comparing South Africa's approach to experiences in the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom. The author highlights the Ikhwezi Bloemfontein Correctional Contracts facility as a significant improvement over public prisons in terms of care and security, but warns against long-term financing arrangements that reduce state leverage and the lack of transparency in private contracts. Recommendations include shortening financing agreements, expanding private sector involvement into community corrections, and establishing independent regulatory monitoring to prevent 'capture'.

The report analyzes Mozambique's legal landscape regarding traditional knowledge (TK), highlighting a fragmented system where protection is often indirect. While the 2007 ABS Regulation (Decree No. 19/2007) is the primary tool for biodiversity-related TK, it faces implementation challenges and is currently under revision. Other frameworks, including the Industrial Property Code and Copyright Law, offer limited or specific protections like geographical indications. The document emphasizes the role of community participation in natural resource management and identifies poverty, weak community institutions, and lack of legal awareness as major barriers to effective TK protection.

The report examines the Lephalale Local Municipality's struggle to provide basic services and guide urban development amidst a population boom triggered by the Medupi power station. It highlights how the municipality's lack of land ownership and technical skills forces a dependency on private entities and higher levels of government, hindering its vision of becoming a vibrant city and energy hub.

PARI supports the South African government's goal to professionalise the public service but argues that the draft National Implementation Framework is too aspirational and focuses excessively on inputs rather than outputs. The organization recommends establishing the Public Service Commission (PSC) as a definitive check on the appointment and removal of senior officials to prevent corruption and patronage. PARI further suggests a 'covering in mechanism' for incremental reform, a shift toward permanent contracts for Directors-General, and a stronger emphasis on consequence management and performance-based career progression to restore institutional capacity and public trust.

The report documents a conference hosted by the Ahmed Kathrada Foundation and the Public Affairs Research Institute (PARI) focused on the systemic nature of state capture in South Africa. It details the erosion of institutions like SARS and the PIC, discusses the role of commissions of inquiry (Zondo, Nugent, and PIC), and explores strategies for recovery including 'lawfare', parliamentary oversight, and public advocacy. The document culminates in a Civil Society Charter that outlines a comprehensive program for institutional reform, whistleblower protection, and the pursuit of accountability for those implicated in state capture.

The report examines land-use management in Lephalale Local Municipality, a region characterized by significant coal reserves and the presence of the Medupi power station. It highlights the municipality's critical lack of land ownership, which forces a reliance on donations and purchases from major entities like Eskom and Exxaro. The analysis details the challenges of providing integrated human settlements, the friction between municipal regulations and private developers, and the complexities of introducing formal land-use schemes in rural areas under traditional authorities, specifically the Seleka Traditional Authority.

PARI argues that South Africa's public procurement system is in crisis due to political interference, capacity deficits, and a fragmented legal regime. While welcoming the draft Public Procurement Bill's aim for a single legal framework, PARI contends it fails to provide a credible enforcement strategy or sufficiently balance procedural integrity with operational flexibility. The document proposes the creation of a single regulatory authority, the adoption of a principles-based strategic procurement approach, and the introduction of 'qui tam' provisions to incentivise private enforcement of procurement law.

The authors contend that the COVID-19 crisis has revealed a "crisis of confidence" in global institutions, specifically the World Health Organization (WHO), which has been hampered by member state limitations and political polarization. The text highlights the United States' decision to withdraw financial support from the WHO as a sign of retreating from a rules-based global system. To address these gaps, the paper recommends a total overhaul of global governance principles, increased fixed financial contributions to the WHO, the removal of trade barriers for medical equipment, and a redefinition of international peace and security to include global health threats within the UN Security Council's remit. It emphasizes that effective responses require farsighted leadership from the UN, G7, G20, and development finance institutions to ensure scientific collaboration and the provision of affordable medical supplies.

The document assesses the Tanzanian parliamentary system, analyzing its structure, the balance of power between the executive and legislature, and the effectiveness of its engagement with civil society. It highlights a significant disparity between the perceptions of parliamentarians and civil society organizations regarding the transparency and adequacy of legislative processes, particularly concerning the time allowed for public consultation on bills and the scrutiny of international loans. While formal mechanisms for oversight exist, such as standing committees and question-and-answer sessions, the paper identifies constraints including party supremacy, limited resources for MPs, and the use of 'certificates of urgency' to bypass public publication of bills.

Nigeria is implementing the SNAP initiative by establishing a coordination office within the Federal Ministry of Environment to identify emission sources and develop a national action plan. The process involves integrating the LEAP-IBC tool to model the impacts of emission scenarios on health, climate, and crop yields. Priority sectors for mitigation include cookstoves, agriculture, transport, brick kilns, and the oil and gas industry, with a focus on improving regulation, enforcement, and legislative frameworks to align with Nigeria's Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs).

The document assesses the Chindwin River Basin in Myanmar, highlighting the impacts of climate change, deforestation, and mining on water quality, biodiversity, and livelihoods. It details the transition of local communities from river-based to groundwater-based water use and argues for an integrated, bottom-up approach to water governance through the Chindwin River Basin Organization (RBO).

The report by Scientists for Global Responsibility (SGR) examines the American Chemical Society's (ACS) alignment between its public sustainability policies and its financial practices. While the ACS expresses concern for climate change and provides educational toolkits, SGR highlights a lack of transparency regarding $1.22bn in securities and continuing financial links to the fossil fuel industry, specifically through the Petroleum Research Fund and sponsorship from ExxonMobil. SGR argues that these ties and the absence of carbon emission targets undermine the ACS's role as a scientific leader in the energy transition.

The report by Scientists for Global Responsibility (SGR) examines the American Meteorological Society's (AMS) financial transparency and ethical alignment. While the AMS acknowledges the scientific consensus on climate change and has implemented some green office measures, SGR identifies indirect fossil fuel investments through mutual funds and significant sponsorship from arms manufacturers such as Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman. SGR argues that these financial links contradict the AMS's stated position on the urgency of the climate crisis.

The report examines the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), finding that while the organization promotes sustainable engineering in its ethics code and conferences, it lacks transparency regarding its $2.55 million investment portfolio. Scientists for Global Responsibility (SGR) highlights that ASEE accepts significant funding from fossil fuel company Chevron as a "Champion Partner" and arms company Boeing as a "Contributing Partner." SGR argues that these ties contradict the goals of the Paris Agreement and pose financial and reputational risks, urging a transition toward renewable energy investments and the divestment of fossil fuel patrons.

The report by Scientists for Global Responsibility (SGR) examines the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM), highlighting a lack of transparency regarding its CA$3.77m in investments and the absence of an ethical investment policy. SGR identifies financial links between CIM and fossil fuel firms Syncrude and Teck Resources, noting that Teck served as a 'Gold sponsor' for CIM's 2021 Convention with a donation of CA$20,000-30,000. While CIM partners with the Mining Association of Canada on the 'Towards Sustainable Mining' standard, SGR argues that CIM's ties to companies not aligned with 1.5C warming limits undermine its stated goal of 'Collaborating towards a sustainable future'.

The report by Scientists for Global Responsibility (SGR) examines the Institution of Chemical Engineers (IChemE), noting that while the organization has committed to net zero operations by 2025 and alignment with climate goals, it maintains 'gold corporate partners' including BP, ExxonMobil, and Shell. SGR criticizes IChemE for a lack of transparency regarding its £6.09m investment portfolio and urges the institution to divest from fossil fuel companies to align with the 1.5°C warming limit and avoid financial and reputational risks.

The document provides recommendations for the US House Committee on Financial Services regarding a proposed $400 million annual investment in the Clean Technology Fund (CTF). It argues that the fund should prioritize 'zero carbon' outcomes and energy efficiency over marginally cleaner fossil fuel technologies like supercritical coal. The author emphasizes that the CTF should be used as a lever to force the World Bank and other Multilateral Development Banks to integrate climate change considerations into their core energy portfolios, noting that as of 2007, over 50% of Bank energy financing ignored climate change. Finally, it asserts that the CTF must align with UNFCCC principles, ensuring transparency, balanced representation between donor and developing nations, and that funding is additional to poverty alleviation aid.

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) is experiencing a "crisis of confidence" following an unproductive July 2018 Board meeting and the departure of its Executive Director. To address this, the World Resources Institute (WRI) proposes a more objective, formula-based framework for determining financial contributions based on factors such as gross national income and GHG emissions. Additionally, the paper recommends strengthening the GCF Board's decision-making effectiveness, implementing independent performance reviews, and increasing transparency in the selection of board members to better represent both developed and developing country constituencies.