Search Climate Insights Directory

The report identifies a five-part cycle for effective mutual accountability: clarifying commitments, sharing performance information, evaluating performance through debate, experiencing reputational or relational consequences, and undertaking corrective action. It emphasizes that mutual accountability should be a constructive, learning-oriented process rather than a punitive one, supported by strong partnership foundations such as shared purpose and equalized power relationships. The findings suggest that for the SWA MAM to succeed, it must be co-designed at the national level, maintain a balance between global legitimacy and national ownership, and be integrated into existing national planning cycles.

The CADWAGO project examined water governance transformations to enhance climate change adaptation. Key findings highlight that power imbalances and conflicts of interest often distort deliberative processes, while extreme climate events can act as catalysts for collaborative, non-neoliberal governance shifts. The project advocates for moving from a 'security' narrative of water—which it argues can amplify inequities—toward a 'water equity' narrative that empowers diverse stakeholder constellations.

The document outlines a research initiative to break down barriers between disaster risk reduction (DRR), adaptation, and development. It argues that development processes often create the very risks they seek to mitigate, and proposes a framework based on understanding risk trade-offs, promoting 'equitable resilience' to address social injustice, and implementing adaptive governance. The brief highlights the Sendai Framework as a key opportunity to integrate these transformative practices globally.

The report argues that mitigation and adaptation are complementary rather than substitutable, as adaptation has physical and societal limits and cannot offset the risks of catastrophic climate change. It critiques most Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) for oversimplifying adaptation as an optimal, linear process and underestimating damage costs. The authors highlight the PAGE09 model as a more robust tool due to its uncertainty analysis. The document also reviews sector-specific physical models for water, agriculture, and coasts, noting that while they provide more detail, they often lack a dynamic representation of the adaptation process. It concludes by proposing a conceptual framework that combines different levels of mitigation and adaptation effort under various socioeconomic pathways to analyze residual risks.

The report argues for a 'symbiosis' of indigenous wisdom and scientific data to build community resilience in Central America. It details the holistic worldview of indigenous peoples, who view climate change as a result of human imbalance with 'Mother Earth'. The study provides a synergy model linking biodiversity, DRR, and CC, and documents success stories where traditional knowledge—such as interpreting natural indicators or using ancestral seeds—effectively mitigated disaster impacts. It concludes that indigenous peoples must be treated as active stakeholders and decision-makers in public policy rather than mere objects of projects.

The document presents a method for analysing water-related poverty by integrating the Sustainable Livelihoods (SL) framework with Bayesian networks (BNs). This approach addresses the 'fuzziness' of livelihood systems—caused by variability, diversity, and uncertainty—by using probability distributions rather than fixed values. The authors introduce a novel way to represent institutions as 'categorical inequality' (e.g., gender) and a 'latent variable' method where indicators serve as indirect evidence for assets rather than direct proxies. The model was applied to data from Si Sa Ket province in Northeast Thailand, demonstrating that locally-originated water supply schemes, such as water tanks and drill wells, can be more effective for poor households than unreliable large-scale irrigation projects.

The report examines adaptive policy-making in the agriculture and water sectors of India and Canada. It proposes a conceptual framework distinguishing between adaptability to anticipated conditions (using 'no-regrets' policies and automatic triggers) and unanticipated conditions (using structured learning and complex adaptive systems principles). Through case studies—including weather-indexed insurance and price policies in India, and the Crow Rate and Conservation Districts in Canada—the authors argue that devolved decision-making and alignment with ecological boundaries (such as watersheds) enhance a policy's ability to respond to unforeseen changes.