Search Climate Insights Directory

The report evaluates Ukraine's green transition readiness, identifying 'Significant Progress' in climate change and energy, 'Some Progress' in clean industry, buildings, transport, agriculture, biodiversity, and finance, and 'Little Progress' in zero-pollution, just transition, digitalization, and research and innovation. It emphasizes the need for high-level coordination, a national sustainable finance taxonomy, and the integration of 'build back better' principles into post-war reconstruction to achieve climate neutrality by 2050.

The document outlines a comprehensive approach to transition finance for Vietnam's high-emission industrial sectors. It introduces a 'Five Hallmarks' framework for creating credible transition plans—covering performance targets, robust planning, implementation, internal monitoring, and external reporting—and provides specific decarbonisation pathways and technical criteria for the steel, cement, and basic chemicals industries. Additionally, it offers a five-tier maturity scale for financial institutions to assess corporate transition credibility and provides best-practice recommendations for issuing sustainability-linked bonds (SLBs) and loans (SLLs) to support the energy transition.

The document outlines a comprehensive methodology for creating and assessing corporate transition plans in Vietnam's high-emission industries. It introduces a 'Five Hallmarks' framework for credible plans, provides sector-specific decarbonization criteria for steel, cement, and basic chemicals, and details the use of sustainability-linked financial instruments. It also presents a five-level classification system for financial institutions to evaluate the maturity and ambition of corporate transitions.

The report analyzes the first 149 companies to adopt SBTi FLAG targets, finding that while uptake is rapid—particularly in Europe and the food and beverage sector—mitigation plans are uneven. Most companies focus on agricultural emissions reduction and food waste, but few engage in forest management or biochar. The report highlights the role of FLAG targets in accelerating no-deforestation commitments and identifies the need for more robust transition plans as target deadlines approach.

Australia's reported fugitive emissions from coal mining have decreased by over 20% since 2005, despite raw coal production increasing by 170% between 1990 and 2022. While some reductions are attributed to mitigation investments, such as VAM-to-power projects and pre-mine drainage, the report argues that the trend is largely driven by a shift toward open-cut mining, the closure of high-emitting underground mines, and changes in emissions accounting methods.

Ecuador's waste sector accounts for 18% of the country's annual methane emissions, with a significant portion concentrated in the cities of Guayaquil and Quito. While the government has established a legal framework promoting the waste hierarchy and inclusive circular economy, implementation is hindered by a lack of long-term planning, insufficient funding for infrastructure, and poor data quality. Current mitigation efforts are limited to landfill gas capture in the three largest disposal sites, while organic waste treatment remains largely decentralized and under-prioritized. The report recommends developing a national integrated solid waste management plan with specific methane targets and improving waste tariff systems to ensure financial sustainability.

The report analyzes hydrogen consumption and production in the EU 27, finding that 84% of consumption is concentrated in refining and ammonia production. It argues that decarbonising existing industrial hydrogen production is a more immediate and necessary priority than nascent sectors like mobility. The analysis highlights that while the EU has a production capacity of 10.3 Mt/y, high energy costs and volatile gas prices have led to low utilisation rates and plant closures in the ammonia and steam cracker sectors.

The report argues that the EU ETS continues to reward heavy polluters through free allowances, which in 2023 alone amounted to approximately 40 billion euros. It highlights that sectors like steel, cement, and chemicals often receive more allowances than they emit, reducing the incentive for decarbonisation. The authors critique the Innovation Fund for over-financing carbon capture technologies (CCS/CCU) rather than scalable zero-emission technologies. To accelerate the transition, the report recommends phasing out free allowances by 2030, fully implementing the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), and reforming the Innovation Fund to prioritise material savings and renewable energy solutions.

The document details the state of waste-related methane emissions in Ecuador, highlighting that the waste sector contributed 3% of total greenhouse gas emissions in 2018, with 92% of those emissions being methane. It identifies significant gaps in the institutional framework, such as the absence of specific methane targets and a lack of mandates for landfill gas capture. The analysis emphasizes that organic waste makes up 70% of the waste stream, yet treatment is limited to composting, with no anaerobic digestors in use. Proposed solutions focus on improving data quality, establishing standardized waste tariffs, and developing a national integrated solid waste management plan that incorporates circular economy principles.

The document outlines the state of methane emissions in Brazil's waste sector, identifying that 15% of national methane emissions in 2022 came from waste, with 68% of those originating from solid waste disposal. It details the institutional framework, current waste management statistics, and key challenges such as low recycling rates and the persistence of open dumps, while recommending improvements in organic waste treatment, landfill gas recovery, and regulatory enforcement.

Global climate finance reached a record USD 1.9 trillion in 2023, with private contributions exceeding USD 1 trillion for the first time. While mitigation finance more than doubled between 2018 and 2023, driven by energy and transport, adaptation finance remains significantly underfunded at USD 65 billion. Investment is heavily concentrated in East Asia and the Pacific, Western Europe, and North America, with 80% of finance sourced domestically. Despite growth, a substantial gap remains to meet the estimated annual need of USD 6.3 trillion by 2030.

Climate finance in Brazil more than doubled between 2019 and 2023, reaching US$ 67.8 billion. The growth was primarily driven by solar energy and AFOLU (Agriculture, Forestry, and Other Land Use), with domestic sources accounting for 90% of total finance. While mitigation dominates the objective mix, finance for loss and damage saw an exponential increase in 2024, largely due to disaster relief following flooding in Rio Grande do Sul.

Reclaim Finance outlines a comprehensive framework for asset managers to drive real-economy decarbonization. It advocates for the adoption of robust transition plans based on five steps: decarbonization targets, strategy, engagement, reporting/governance, and just transition/biodiversity. The report sets specific phase-out dates for fossil fuel assets—including coal by 2030 in OECD/European countries and 2040 globally—and demands that asset managers use specific databases like the Global Coal Exit List (GCEL) and Global Oil & Gas Exit List (GOGEL) to implement restrictions. It further details an escalation strategy for engagement and strict voting principles, recommending that asset managers vote against director re-elections and executive remuneration if companies fail to publish science-based transition plans or continue fossil fuel expansion.

The report outlines a framework for banks to implement robust climate transition plans and sectoral policies to eliminate support for coal, oil, gas, and unabated power generation. It advocates for a shift in financial flows toward sustainable power supply, recommending a 6:1 financing ratio in favor of sustainable energy over fossil fuels by 2030. The document specifies strict exclusion criteria for 'coal developers' and 'gas power developers,' demands transparent reporting on 'real-world economy' GHG emissions, and calls for a responsible climate lobbying policy aligned with 1.5°C pathways.

The report outlines a comprehensive framework for (re)insurers to decarbonize their business models. It advocates for the adoption of Net Zero Transition Plans (NZTP) based on 1.5°C scenarios and establishes specific restrictions for the coal, oil and gas, and power sectors. Key demands include the immediate cessation of support for fossil fuel expansion, the implementation of time-bound phase-out dates for unsustainable power and hydrocarbons, and the use of rigorous engagement and voting policies to hold portfolio companies accountable.

The document examines the role of Canadian financial institutions in managing climate disclosures and target setting for the agriculture sector, highlighting specific sectoral challenges and available measurement tools.

The briefing finds that while net zero commitments among the top 50 steel producers have slightly increased, half of these companies still lack a 2050 target, and 23 lack concrete intermediate milestones. Transparency remains low, with only 15 companies defining their emission scopes. The report highlights the 2023 launch of the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) steel sector guidance as a key tool for improving target transparency and ambition, citing SSAB and Thyssenkrupp as early adopters.

The report analyzes Mexico's waste sector methane emissions, highlighting a significant increase since 1990 and a lack of integrated data systems. It identifies critical gaps in organic waste treatment, landfill gas capture, and municipal financing, while providing recommendations to strengthen the regulatory framework and improve stakeholder capacity to meet national climate targets.

Global climate finance more than doubled between 2018 and 2022, reaching USD 1.46 trillion in 2022, yet remains far below the USD 7.4 trillion annual average needed by 2030 for a 1.5°C scenario. Mitigation finance dominates the landscape, driven by renewable energy and electric vehicles in advanced economies and China, while adaptation finance, though growing, remains severely underfunded, particularly for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Small Island Developing States (SIDS). The report highlights a critical imbalance, noting that fossil fuel subsidies reached USD 1.4 trillion in 2022, nearly equaling total climate finance. It recommends reforming the global financial architecture through increased concessional finance, risk mitigation, and the redirection of fossil fuel expenditures to close the investment gap.

The report finds that international concessional climate finance grew by 50% from 2019 to reach USD 81 billion in 2022, though it remains small compared to fossil fuel subsidies. Sub-Saharan Africa is the primary recipient of these flows. The analysis highlights a gap in adaptation finance and a lack of standardized impact metrics. Domestic concessional finance is heavily concentrated in high-income economies, particularly Western Europe, and focuses primarily on mitigation. The report recommends redirecting fossil fuel subsidies, targeting fragile and conflict-affected states, and streamlining project approval processes to enhance efficiency.