Search Climate Insights Directory

The Alliance for Responsible Trade (ART) warns Trade Ministers that proposed intellectual property rules in the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) could limit governments' ability to provide affordable essential medicines and undermine national sustainable development projects by exceeding TRIPS agreement standards. The coalition also calls for greater transparency in the negotiation process, requesting the publication of clear texts and the holding of national and regional public hearings to ensure substantive civil society dialogue.

The Cartagena Declaration, issued in September 2003, argues that a 'predatory economic model' and the 'greed' of the Global North drive systemic environmental and human rights violations. It highlights specific injustices, such as the fumigation of the Amazon and the desecration of sacred sites by the oil industry, while criticizing the role of transnational corporations and multilateral development banks. The declaration calls for a shift toward 'ecological security, food security and energy security' and an end to the criminalization of environmental defenders.

The fact sheet criticizes the US for leveraging food aid and World Trade Organization (WTO) disputes to pressure countries into accepting genetically modified foods. It highlights instances where African nations were forced to choose between GMO aid or famine during the 2002 food crisis and denounces new US legislation that potentially links AIDS assistance to the acceptance of GMOs. The document advocates for the 'precautionary principle' and the right of sovereign nations to reject GMOs, proposing five principles for food aid that prioritize local purchases, informed consent, and sustainable agricultural development over the commercial interests of the US biotechnology industry.

The document outlines a global water crisis driven by overconsumption, pollution, and flawed management models. It strongly opposes the market-based approach to water management promoted by transnational corporations and international financial institutions, arguing that privatization often excludes the poor and ignores ecological health. Instead, it proposes a framework where water is treated as a human right and a public resource, prioritizing basic needs and ecosystem protection over industrial and commercial interests. The briefing calls for democratic, participatory governance, the protection of traditional management systems, and the cancellation of external debts for developing nations to enable investment in public water services.

A coalition of NGOs argues that the WTO's use of exclusive, invitation-only meetings—such as the mini-ministerial in Australia and 'Green Room' meetings—undermines democratic principles and pressures developing countries to accept terms favorable to developed nations. The statement demands a transition to transparent, inclusive consensus-building mechanisms and a neutral WTO Secretariat.

CIEL urges the World Bank to revise its draft resettlement policy to ensure the 'improvement' of living standards rather than mere 'restoration', to establish minimum standards for voluntary resettlement, and to protect the rights of indigenous peoples through free and informed consent.

The Center for International Environmental Law and International Rivers Network express serious reservations regarding the World Bank's draft resettlement policy, arguing it curtails the rights of project-affected people. The authors highlight several problematic areas: the removal of protections for those lacking legal land titles, which disproportionately affects indigenous peoples; the limitation of compensation to 'direct' impacts only; the lack of safeguards for 'voluntary' resettlers; the rejection of an 'improvement' standard for livelihoods in favor of mere 'restoration'; and the creation of a separate, less protective process for people affected by conservation areas. The letter urges the World Bank to align its policy with the recommendations of the World Commission on Dams and to restore transparency to the revision process.

The Harare Declaration, adopted during the first African Conference on Debt and Development (AfCoDD) in August 2021, calls for a systemic overhaul of the global debt architecture to address the vulnerabilities of African nations. It highlights how the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated poverty and debt burdens, potentially pushing 39 million Africans into extreme poverty. The document criticizes the current system for prioritizing creditor interests over social and environmental justice, noting a shift toward commercial bonds and a lack of transparency in debt contraction. To counter this, the declaration proposes the creation of an African Monitoring and Control Mechanism, a Monetary Fund, and an African Bank. It further advocates for a feminist approach to macroeconomics, a green recovery aligned with the AU's Agenda 2063, and the possibility of collective debt default to break the cycle of neoliberal dependency.

The document is a letter from a coalition of Canadian organizations supporting the Pan-Canadian Framework on Climate Change and Clean Growth. The authors argue that Canada's long-term prosperity depends on investing in a low-carbon economic transformation to remain competitive in a global clean technology market. They emphasize the necessity of 'just transition measures' to support workers and communities affected by the shift away from high-carbon sectors. The coalition offers specific support for implementing the framework, including prioritizing engagement with Indigenous communities based on the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, establishing a robust federal backstop for carbon pricing, and modernizing electricity and transportation systems to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

A group of physicians urges the Alberta government to establish a sustainability office within Alberta Health Services (AHS) to address energy efficiency and waste management, proposing that funding be provided via grants from the carbon levy to avoid impacting clinical budgets.

The document argues that continued investment in fossil fuels contradicts the medical commitment to 'do no harm' and provides a five-step process for health organizations to transition their assets. It highlights the financial risk of 'stranded' carbon reserves and the economic opportunity of renewable energy, citing the fossil fuel sector as the worst performing in the S&P500 since 2007. The guide recommends using the Carbon Underground 200 to identify divestment targets and suggests reinvesting at least 5% of portfolios into climate solutions.

The document is a joint open letter signed by 189 individuals and numerous organisations calling for the COP30 summit to address the systemic threat of climate disinformation. The signatories argue that the proliferation of false information undermines the Paris Agreement and hinders the transition to a sustainable future. They demand that COP30 establish a formal framework for information integrity, increase transparency regarding the funding of climate-related communications, and hold actors accountable for the intentional spread of disinformation. The letter emphasizes that without a commitment to truth and evidence-based policy, global efforts to limit warming to 1.5°C are at risk.

The document serves as a resource guide for the Canadian education system to counter the influence of corporate interests in climate curricula. It categorizes a wide array of vetted materials across themes such as climate science, Indigenous perspectives, civic engagement, and climate justice. Additionally, it lists advocacy networks, including For Our Kids and the Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment, which work to remove industry-sponsored materials from schools.

The Clean Air Task Force asserts that the current TEN-E proposal fails to support EU decarbonization by excluding CO2 storage and non-pipeline transport (such as ships, barges, rail, and trucks). The document argues that because geologic storage is unequally distributed across Europe, cross-border storage is a prerequisite for a level playing field in the Single Market. It claims the exclusion of storage contradicts the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance Taxonomy, increases investor risk, and ignores the fact that climate mitigation only materializes at the point of permanent storage.

The undersigned authors express concern that a provisional agreement on RePowerEU would weaken the EU Innovation Fund by allowing Member States to use its grants (60%) and front-loading ETS allowances (40%) to raise revenues. They argue that reducing the fund contradicts the needs of Europe's industrial transformation, noting that the fund's first call in 2021 was oversubscribed by more than 20 times. The letter highlights that nearly 50% of emissions reductions needed for 2050 goals depend on technologies not yet deployed at scale, particularly for hard-to-abate sectors like cement, steel, and chemicals. The authors warn that while the United States is implementing massive investment plans, the EU risks losing its industrial base and jobs if it fails to lower the cost of next-generation decarbonisation technologies. Finally, they urge Member States to reject the European Commission's proposal to auction allowances from the Market Stability Reserve, as this could increase emissions and lower the carbon price signal.

The document advocates for the inclusion of mobile CO2 transport modalities—such as ships, barges, rail, and trucks—within the TEN-T Regulation to reduce investor risk and ensure equitable access to carbon storage sites across the EU.

The document argues that climate change disproportionately harms disadvantaged people and that current policies are failing to achieve gender equality and low-carbon commitments. It calls for the integration of gender equality and low-carbon development goals to avoid 'maladaptation' and ensure just transitions. The call to action provides specific recommendations for governments, multilateral organisations, the private sector, and LGBTQIA+ movements to foster gender-equitable 'green' and 'blue' economies, improve women's access to resources, and increase the climate literacy of gender equality movements.

The document examines how 'suppressed demand'—the unmet desire for products or services due to barriers like low income, poor infrastructure, and high technology costs—disadvantages low-income countries in the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). Current CDM methodologies typically use 'actual consumption' as a baseline, which results in lower certified emission reductions (CERs) and makes projects less attractive to investors. The brief advocates for using 'desired consumption' as the baseline to reward avoided pollution and promote sustainable development. It highlights the outcomes of CMP7, which requested the CDM Executive Board to accelerate the implementation of guidelines on suppressed demand, particularly for LDCs, Small Island Developing States (SIDS), and African countries, while calling for increased capacity building and skills enhancement in these regions.

The report critiques the IFC's Green Equity Approach (GEA), noting that while it aims to phase out coal by 2030, loopholes allow continued fossil fuel financing. It proposes ten essential reforms, including extending the ban to oil and gas, closing underwriting loopholes, ensuring gender equality, and implementing full public disclosure of sub-projects to achieve true Paris alignment.

The document argues that oil and gas activities threaten biodiversity at every stage, from exploration to end use, and calls for an immediate halt to new projects, particularly in high-biodiversity areas. It highlights the specific risks to the Amazon and the Verde Island Passage, and advocates for a just phaseout of fossil fuels to meet the 2050 goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework.