Search Climate Insights Directory

The document outlines four core communication principles—normalising support, framing action as ambitious rather than radical, highlighting global efforts, and avoiding the normalisation of opposition—while providing specific messaging strategies for Progressive Activists, the Incrementalist Left, Established Liberals, and Traditional Conservatives in the UK.

Mighty Earth has launched a campaign following investigations that revealed the destruction of 100,000 acres of orangutan habitat and Indigenous Dayak forest in Indonesia. The report identifies American RV manufacturers, including Winnebago, Thor Inc., and Forest River, as consumers of meranti wood sourced from suppliers Mayawana Persada and Alas Kusuma, who were found excavating peat in violation of Indonesian law. While Indonesia has reduced commercial deforestation by approximately 90%, this case highlights ongoing evasion of forest protections. Following public scrutiny, the Indonesian Ministry of Forestry ordered the responsible company to halt its bulldozers.

The Clean Air Task Force urges the Asian Development Bank (ADB) to remove its funding ban on nuclear energy to help Asia-Pacific economies meet rising energy demands with clean, firm power. The document highlights that while countries like China and South Korea have successfully used nuclear energy for industrialization, other emerging economies in the region have failed to implement programs due to financing and expertise gaps. It specifically identifies the Ninh Thuận projects in Vietnam and the Bataan Nuclear Power Plant in the Philippines as immediate opportunities for ADB intervention. The author recommends that ADB lift its ban, build internal expertise, create dedicated funds for large and small modular reactors, and prioritize risk-sharing with private and government investors.

The Clean Air Task Force (CATF) warns that the Department of Energy (DOE), Department of the Interior (DOI), and Department of Agriculture (USDA) have issued nonbinding procedural guidance that replaces binding NEPA regulations. CATF asserts that these changes create project uncertainty for developers and communities by making requirements readily changeable without public input. Key concerns include the removal of requirements for draft environmental reviews, the weakening of safeguards for categorical exclusions, and the elimination of mandates to analyze environmental justice and cumulative effects. CATF argues that these rollbacks will increase the risk of litigation and community backlash, thereby slowing the deployment of clean energy infrastructure rather than accelerating it.

Wildfire smoke pollution in the U.S. has increased significantly, with per-person exposure four times higher between 2020-2024 than during 2006-2019. Research indicates that fine particulate matter (PM2.5) from wildfire smoke caused approximately 164,000 premature deaths in the U.S. from 2006 to 2020, with human-caused climate change accounting for about 15,000 of those deaths. While the West and Northwest experience the most smoke days, smoke is a nationwide issue, with every county in the contiguous U.S. seeing at least 16 smoke days annually. The rise in smoke since 2016 has stalled or reversed air quality improvements in 30 U.S. states, threatening the goals of the Clean Air Act.

The report examines the intersection of Japan's energy policy and national security, arguing that a faster shift to renewables—potentially reaching 70% of electricity generation by 2035—would mitigate risks associated with fragile fossil fuel supply chains and geopolitical instability. While acknowledging challenges such as China's dominance in clean energy supply chains and cybersecurity risks, the authors contend these are manageable compared to the vulnerabilities of continued fossil fuel dependence. The document recommends greater inter-ministerial coordination between energy, defense, and diplomatic agencies to prioritize renewables as a national security imperative.

The Clean Air Task Force (CATF) supports the Washington Department of Ecology's draft forest offset rule, which introduces more rigorous standards for carbon credit calculation and verification. Key proposed changes include recalculating baselines every 10 years, increasing the default market leakage rate from 20% to 40%, and using spatially explicit risk data for buffer pool contributions. While CATF praises these steps toward transparency and conservatism, it recommends further improvements, such as adopting empirical dynamic baselines, removing buffer pool contribution caps for fire and biotic risks, and moving away from real estate appraisals for avoided conversion projects to ensure credits represent actual CO2 reductions.

Carbon Market Watch argues against scrapping the CBAM despite industry complaints about administrative complexity, suggesting instead that the EU quantify actual carbon leakage and circumvention risks before expanding the mechanism to downstream products. The organization emphasizes that complementary EU policies like the Digital Product Passport and international standards can mitigate administrative burdens. It further recommends providing special treatment for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Small Island Developing States (SIDS) to align with UNFCCC principles.

Reclaim Finance analyzes EFRAG's proposal to reduce ESRS data points by 68%, warning that this limits comparability and data quality. The organization specifically criticizes proposed 'reliefs'—such as the 'undue cost or effort' filter—that could allow companies to avoid reporting material information. Additionally, the document argues that the standards fail to adequately address the financial sector, calling for more precise reporting on fossil fuel financing and the use of physical intensity targets rather than attribution-based metrics like PCAF.

The document highlights the environmental and health risks associated with spreading sewage sludge on approximately 70 million acres of U.S. farmland, noting that such sludge often contains per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). It criticizes the EPA for failing to finalize risk assessments for PFOA and PFOS and for underestimating the risks of over 150 other PFAS chemicals detected in sludge. The text cites specific farm failures in Maine and Michigan due to contamination and notes that while some states like Maine have banned the practice, others still encourage it. The author calls for federal regulations, the protection of local government authority to restrict sludge use, and corporate accountability for clean-up.

The report identifies a critical gap in food loss and waste (FLW) research in Southeast Asia, noting an over-reliance on technocratic efficiency and a lack of focus on power structures and gender equity. Through case studies in Bali (coffee), regional small-scale fisheries, and Bangkok (urban agriculture), the authors find that socio-institutional innovations—such as social forestry and collective action—are generally more effective than standalone technologies like biogas digesters or solar dryers, which often suffer from poor maintenance and limited local uptake. The report argues that FLW is deeply linked to gender and social inclusion (GESI) gaps, as women often dominate critical loss points in the value chain but lack the resources and decision-making power to implement improvements. It recommends a rights-based, participatory approach aligned with agroecology and the City-Region Food Systems (CRFS) framework to achieve a just food systems transformation.

Japan and South Korea experienced extreme summer heat in 2025, with Japan recording its hottest June and July in 127 years. The Climate Shift Index (CSI) indicates that human-caused climate change made these events at least five times more likely, with several cities experiencing over a month of CSI level 5 temperatures.

The report finds widespread public support for clean energy in the UK, with high levels of acceptance for wind turbines and solar panels across the political spectrum. It notes that in Scotland and Wales, renewable energy projects generate national pride comparable to or exceeding that of the fossil fuel industry. The analysis suggests that 'stories of progress' are more compelling to the public than narratives of failure or radical change. While support for renewables is high, the document emphasizes that fossil fuel industries remain tied to national identity and history, and that the transition must account for job losses and the perceived value of the industrial past.

The report examines how people in Britain perceive the financial impact of climate policies, noting that while many fear costs, few believe scrapping these policies would save them money. It highlights a strong public desire for a 'just transition' where the least well-off are protected and big polluting companies are held accountable. The findings suggest that framing climate action as an investment in a prosperous future is more compelling than technical terminology.

The document finds that while deep distrust in politicians and institutions affects how climate action is perceived, there remains enduring support among Brits for ambitious climate leadership. People value leaders who are credible, passionate, and empathetic, and who prioritize tangible local benefits and global collective action over a reliance on statistics. The report suggests that climate leadership should be grounded in local contexts and delivered by authentic messengers to overcome disillusionment.

The report finds that while a strong majority of Britons want to be consulted on local climate and energy projects, there is significant distrust that these consultations are meaningful, with many viewing them as 'tick-box exercises'. Barriers to engagement include a lack of trust in government sincerity and a feeling of being uninformed. The findings suggest a shift in preference toward online engagement over in-person methods and emphasize the need for transparent, personal, and multi-channel communication to build trust.

A coalition of 42 organizations, including Earthjustice and the NRDC, submitted comments on the EPA's Draft Sewage Sludge Risk Assessment for PFOA and PFOS. The coalition argues that the EPA's assessment confirms that these 'forever chemicals' in sewage sludge pose unacceptable risks to human health and the environment, particularly through land application on farms. They claim the EPA's risk calculations are underestimates because they use low-end concentration models and ignore combined exposure effects. The document calls for the prompt finalization of the assessment, the establishment of numerical limitations and management practices under the Clean Water Act, and the expansion of future risk assessments to include other PFAS, synthetic organic fluorine compounds, and microplastics. Additionally, they advocate for stricter pretreatment standards for industrial dischargers to prevent PFAS from entering publicly-owned treatment works.

A research analysis by World Weather Attribution finds that human-induced climate change made a July 2025 heatwave in Norway, Sweden, and Finland approximately 2°C hotter and at least ten times more likely than in a preindustrial climate. The event caused significant strain on healthcare systems, disrupted reindeer grazing and Sámi livelihoods, and led to increased drowning deaths and wildfires. The report highlights that current winter-focused building designs in the Nordic region are inadequate for rising temperatures and that similar heatwaves are now twice as likely as they were during the previous major event in 2018 due to a global warming increase from 1.1°C to 1.3°C.

The policy brief outlines how climate change and historical land management have increased wildfire risk across Canada, leading to record-breaking seasons and significant financial losses. It proposes five key government interventions: restricting development in high-hazard zones, mandating fire-resilient building codes, implementing fuel management and Indigenous cultural burning, increasing firefighting capacity, and accelerating carbon emission reductions.

A coalition of environmental organizations argues that Arendalsuka, a major Norwegian democratic festival, should drop Equinor as a sponsor. The authors claim Equinor is one of 36 'fossil giants' responsible for over half of global CO2 emissions and accuse the company of using 'petroganda' to manipulate public perception. They highlight that in 2023, only 0.15% of Equinor's total production was renewable energy, contrasting this with the company's image as a pioneer in low-carbon solutions. The statement further notes that Equinor spent 833 million NOK on sponsorships over the last five years to preserve its image.