Search Climate Insights Directory

The Clean Air Task Force (CATF) opposes a broad 5% incrementality exemption for the section 45V hydrogen production tax credit, asserting it would increase emissions. Instead, CATF proposes targeted solutions: using real-time price floors and Department of Energy analyses to define curtailments, and applying financial distress tests to facilities seeking to avoid retirement.

The policy brief contends that the GREET model's outdated assumptions regarding land displacement and forest impacts lead to a significant underestimation of indirect land use change (ILUC) emissions for sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). This discrepancy allows high-emissions fuels, particularly land-intensive soy and corn biofuels, to qualify for the section 40B tax credit, which the author argues distorts the market against waste-based and synthetic SAF and contradicts congressional intent. The document advocates for updating GREET to a methodology similar to the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA), which incorporates a broader range of ILUC values to better reflect global market impacts.

The EU is facing a 'planning gap' where ambitious climate goals lack the detailed implementation roadmaps necessary for success. This is evidenced by draft National Energy and Climate Plans (NECPs) that lack credibility and substance, particularly regarding carbon capture and storage, methane reduction, and small modular reactors. The author urges Member States to use the remaining time before the June 2024 deadline to transform NECPs from bureaucratic exercises into strategic priorities that provide investor certainty and resilience against supply chain or geopolitical bottlenecks.

The document evaluates how CEE countries have integrated public consultation and multilevel climate and energy dialogues (MCEDs) into their updated NECPs, finding significant variability in quality and frequent failures to meet European law requirements for early and inclusive engagement.

Colombia is the third largest emitter of waste methane in Latin America and the Caribbean, with the waste sector accounting for 22% of the country's annual methane emissions. While the country has a robust regulatory framework and high collection rates, it relies heavily on landfills, many of which are nearing capacity. The report identifies significant gaps in organic waste management, data disaggregation, and financial incentives for methane mitigation, recommending the development of a national waste methane strategy and improved technical capacity at the municipal level.

The report analyzes the federal permitting process for high-capacity electric transmission lines in the U.S., identifying systemic delays caused by poor interagency coordination, capacity shortages, and regulatory misalignment between federal and state authorities. Based on a dataset of 37 projects and case studies, it argues that while litigation is often cited as a primary barrier, it is rarely the sole cause of project failure. The authors recommend that the President prioritize transmission as a national priority, that Congress consolidate siting authority for multi-state projects, and that agencies adopt more agile, transparent, and collaborative environmental review processes, including expanded use of programmatic EISs and categorical exclusions.

The report identifies 219 facilities in Pennsylvania eligible for 45Q tax credits, emitting 82.5 million metric tons of CO2 annually. While the Lockport and Knox formations offer a theoretical storage capacity of 510 to 1,640 million metric tons, low permeability across most assessed saline aquifers poses significant challenges for commercially viable injection. Alternative options include depleted oil and gas fields, CO2-enhanced oil recovery (EOR), and the Marcellus and Utica shales, though the latter requires further research. Due to the geographic mismatch between emission sources and high-quality storage sites, the report concludes that CO2 pipelines will likely be necessary.

The report outlines a vision for the San Joaquin Valley (SJV) to leverage its land and industrial base to become a hub for clean energy, focusing on solar, bioenergy, and hydrogen. Using modeling from the RAND Corporation, it argues that a diverse energy portfolio can create thousands of high-wage jobs and reduce local pollution. The authors emphasize the need for a coordinated, valley-wide community benefits framework to ensure that rural and disadvantaged communities receive equitable economic gains from new developments.

The report argues that the EU is not on track to meet its 2030 and 2050 climate goals and must shift to an 'option-based' approach that integrates a broad range of low- and zero-carbon technologies. Key recommendations include scaling up carbon capture and storage (CCS), diversifying the energy mix with small modular reactors (SMRs), superhot rock geothermal, and fusion energy, and implementing a rigorous methane import standard. It emphasizes the need for a comprehensive green industrial strategy, a dedicated climate fund to replace the Recovery and Resilience Facility, and international cooperation to set global clean-tech standards.

The document explores the theoretical capacity of superhot rock energy in South America, highlighting its potential to meet rising energy demands, reduce fossil fuel reliance, and leverage existing oil and gas expertise, while noting that commercial scale is not expected by 2030.

The document argues that superhot rock energy could be a ubiquitous, low-land-footprint renewable source capable of replacing fossil fuel generation. Preliminary modeling suggests that approximately 20% of U.S. land area has superhot rock potential at depths below 8 miles, with just 1% of this resource potentially providing 4.3 terawatts of energy capacity. The report highlights that the U.S. oil and gas sector's subsurface expertise could accelerate commercialization, and that mature plants could eventually offer electricity as low as $25-40 per MWh.

The document argues that superhot rock energy could provide a ubiquitous, low-land-footprint source of firm power in Europe. Preliminary modeling suggests that approximately 9% of Europe's land area has superhot rock potential at depths below 12.5 km, with just 1% of this resource capable of providing 2.1 terawatts of energy capacity. While not expected to meet 2030 climate goals, the technology could eventually replace fossil fuels, leverage existing oil and gas workforce expertise, and offer competitive electricity costs of $25-40 (USD) per MWh for mature plants. Realizing this potential requires significant public and private investment in deep drilling R&D, pilot projects, and new regulatory frameworks.

The document argues that superhot rock energy could provide a ubiquitous, carbon-free, and land-efficient power source for the MENA region, leveraging existing subsurface expertise from the oil and gas industry to overcome technological hurdles.

The document explores the potential of superhot rock energy in Africa, highlighting its capacity to provide massive amounts of carbon-free electricity and its potential to drive economic growth and energy access.

The document explores the potential of superhot rock energy in Asia, highlighting its capacity to provide massive amounts of carbon-free electricity and its potential to replace fossil fuels while requiring minimal land use.

The document explores the potential of superhot rock energy in North America, estimating that 13% of the land area has potential at depths below 12.5 km. It argues that this resource could provide massive amounts of carbon-free electricity, leverage existing oil and gas expertise, and require significantly less land than other energy sources, with mature costs potentially as low as $25-40 per MWh.

CATF opposes the UK government's consultation on hydrogen blending into gas networks, stating that low-carbon hydrogen is too scarce and expensive to be used for residential heating or minimal GHG reductions in power generation. They recommend prioritising 'no regrets' industrial sectors, such as refineries and ammonia producers, and using electrolytic hydrogen from curtailed electricity for long-duration energy storage instead of grid injection.

The document argues that Oceania possesses significant superhot rock energy potential, with modeling suggesting that 15% of the region's land area has resources at depths below 12.5 km. It highlights that just 1% of this resource could provide 1.1 terawatts of energy capacity. The report suggests that the region's existing oil and gas expertise could be leveraged to commercialize this technology, which offers high energy density and low land-use requirements compared to other renewables. While not expected to meet 2030 climate goals, it is presented as a long-term solution for decarbonization and grid stability.

The NGO Declaration on the Future of Nuclear Energy advocates for the rapid expansion of nuclear power to support global decarbonization and energy security, while emphasizing that speed must not compromise safety or security. It calls for coordinated leadership across government, industry, and finance, and suggests specific actions such as pooling resources for design orderbooks, implementing sustained investment policies, and maintaining independent regulatory capabilities.

The paper outlines a strategic framework for Europe to achieve leadership in clean energy innovation, emphasizing that financial investment alone is insufficient. It proposes four pillars of innovative capacity: building human capital, pushing early-stage technology, creating demand-side market incentives, and securing access to key resources. Using Norway's carbon capture and storage (CCS) leadership as a case study, the author demonstrates how aligning these pillars creates a competitive advantage that is difficult for other regions to imitate. The document concludes that Europe should target sectors where it has natural resource advantages and integrate its policies to create a cohesive ecosystem rather than relying on isolated funding or deployment targets.