Search Climate Insights Directory

The report documents an upward trend in American concern about global warming, with 73% believing it is happening and 69% feeling at least somewhat worried. While 62% recognize it as mostly human-caused and 57% acknowledge scientific consensus, only 20% understand that over 90% of climate scientists agree on human-caused warming. Personal experience of effects has risen to 46%, and 48% believe people in the U.S. are being harmed 'right now'. Despite these trends, fewer than half of Americans perceive social norms encouraging action, and 59% rarely or never discuss the issue with family and friends.

The report finds broad bipartisan support for transitioning to 100% clean, renewable energy by 2050, with 85% of registered voters supporting such a requirement for utilities. While most Americans view clean energy positively and believe it will boost economic growth, there is a significant gap in awareness and access to purchasing 100% clean electricity. Support for renewable energy research and tax rebates for energy-efficient vehicles has increased between 2013 and 2018, particularly among conservative Republicans.

The report finds that a majority of US registered voters believe global warming is happening and human-caused, with notable increases in these beliefs among Republicans. There is broad cross-party support for clean energy policies like the Green New Deal and carbon taxes, though voters remain split on fossil fuel expansion. While many express a willingness to take collective action, few have actually contacted elected officials in the past year.

The report identifies a gender gap in the U.S. where women generally exhibit higher levels of concern and risk perception regarding climate change than men, despite scoring lower on tests of scientific knowledge and expressing greater uncertainty about climate facts. It argues that closing these knowledge gaps through targeted education is essential, as women are often more vulnerable to climate impacts and are key to implementing global climate solutions.

The report finds that while global warming is generally ranked lower than immediate issues like terrorism and healthcare, its importance as a voting priority varies significantly by political affiliation and geography. Liberal Democrats rank it as the fourth most important issue, whereas conservative Republicans rank it as the least important of 28 issues. Regional differences are evident, with high priority in states like New York and Hawaii, and lower priority in states like Alabama and West Virginia. However, the broader issue of environmental protection is a higher priority for about half of registered voters.

Analysis of surveys involving over 8,000 U.S. adults reveals that most Americans, including those highly concerned about climate change, significantly underestimate the 97% scientific consensus on human-caused global warming. The study identifies that while pro-climate opinions can form through non-scientific routes like social norms, correcting the underestimation of scientific consensus can act as a 'gateway' to increase worry and support for climate policy.

The report finds that while more than six in ten Americans are worried about global warming in 2018, feelings of hope have declined since 2010. Hope is identified as a key driver for individual and political action. Despite this, the report highlights strong public support for renewable energy research, carbon taxes, and climate education, alongside the growth of the clean energy workforce and institutional commitments to the Paris Climate Agreement.

The report finds that Latinos in the U.S., especially Spanish-language speakers, are more likely to be 'Alarmed' and less likely to be 'Dismissive' of global warming than non-Latinos. While Alarmed Latinos show a high willingness to join political campaigns, they face distinct barriers, including fear of attracting attention from immigration authorities and a lack of knowledge regarding which officials to contact.

The document analyzes climate change perceptions among US residents, finding that Spanish-speaking Latinos are significantly more likely to be 'Alarmed' and less likely to be 'Dismissive' than non-Latinos. While 'Alarmed' individuals across all groups show similar willingness to join political campaigns, Spanish-speaking Latinos face unique barriers, including fear of attracting immigration authorities and a lack of knowledge regarding which elected officials to contact.

The March 2018 report 'Climate Change in the American Mind' reveals an upward trend in American concern about global warming. 70% of adults believe global warming is happening, and 58% attribute it primarily to human activities. While 62% express worry and 41% report personally experiencing its effects, only 6% believe humans can and will successfully reduce it. The issue is most commonly conceptualized as an environmental (74%) and scientific (68%) challenge, with the primary motivation for reduction being to provide a better life for future generations.

A March 2018 survey of 1,067 registered US voters reveals broad bipartisan support for renewable energy and carbon pollution limits, despite significant political divides over the causes of global warming and the priority level assigned to climate action. While 73% of voters believe global warming is happening, only 40% of conservative Republicans share this view. However, majorities across the political spectrum support funding renewable energy research and regulating carbon dioxide. The report also notes a gap between stated support for climate action and actual individual engagement, with only 13% of voters having contacted an elected official about global warming in the previous year.

The October 2017 survey indicates an upward trend in American concern about global warming, with 71% believing it is happening and 47% feeling certain of it. While 54% attribute it to human activity, only 15% are aware of the strong scientific consensus. Emotional responses are predominantly negative, with 55% feeling disgusted and 52% feeling helpless. Perceived risks are at record highs, with 44% reporting personal experience of its effects and 42% believing people in the U.S. are being harmed "right now." Despite this, optimism for a human-led solution remains low, with only 5% confident that humans can and will successfully reduce global warming.

The report finds that while a majority of US registered voters believe global warming is happening and human-caused, there is significant political polarization, particularly among conservative Republicans. Despite this, there is broad cross-party support for various clean energy policies, such as renewable energy research and tax rebates for energy-efficient vehicles. However, a gap exists between the willingness of voters to advocate for climate policy and their actual engagement in such activities.

A survey by the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication finds that a majority of Americans in every U.S. state support U.S. participation in the Paris Agreement, with 69% of registered voters nationwide in favor.

The May 2017 survey indicates that 70% of Americans believe global warming is happening, with 58% attributing it to human activities. While 59% believe it affects U.S. weather and 40% report personal experience with its effects, most perceive it as a distant threat. Public understanding of the scientific consensus remains low, with only 13% aware that over 90% of climate scientists agree on human-caused warming. Despite broad support for climate education in schools (78%), optimism for successful human intervention is low, with only 7% believing humans can and will successfully reduce global warming.

The report finds that Latinos in the U.S. are significantly more engaged with global warming than non-Latinos, showing higher levels of belief in human-caused warming, greater worry, and stronger support for climate policies. Spanish-language Latinos exhibit the highest levels of engagement. While many Latinos are willing to take political action, they face specific barriers, including a lack of outreach from organizations and fears regarding immigration authorities.

The report finds that while a majority of US registered voters believe global warming is happening and support various clean energy policies, there is a significant gap between their stated willingness to advocate for climate action and their actual behavior. Political polarization remains evident, with conservative Republicans showing the lowest levels of concern and support for regulatory measures, although they still support renewable energy research and tax rebates for energy-efficient products.

The report finds that Latinos in the U.S. are generally more concerned about and committed to addressing global warming than non-Latinos, with Spanish-speaking Latinos showing the highest levels of engagement. A significant majority of Latinos believe global warming is real and human-caused, and they strongly support climate-friendly policies such as carbon taxes and renewable energy investment. However, they face substantial barriers to political action, including a lack of outreach from environmental organizations and fears regarding immigration authorities.

The author asserts that while President Trump pledged to "cancel the Paris Agreement," no single nation can technically cancel the international deal for others. The text highlights that registered American voters support U.S. participation by a margin of more than 5 to 1, including approximately half of those who voted for Trump in 2016. Furthermore, the document notes that over 150 of the largest U.S. corporations, including major oil companies, have affirmed their commitment to climate action. The author warns that withdrawing would undermine diplomatic relationships with major economies like China, the EU, and the U.K., and damage the international standing of the U.S.

The report analyzes a 2014 survey of 1,576 American adults to determine how conceptualizations of nature's balance—whether viewed as stable, delicate, or random—influence perceptions of global warming. It finds that those who view nature as delicate are most likely to believe in global warming, while those who view it as very stable are least likely. Specifically, the 'Disengaged' segment and individuals with annual household incomes under $25,000 are the most likely to perceive nature as random and unpredictable.