Search Climate Insights Directory

More than 100 civil society organizations express deep concern over the Green Climate Fund's (GCF) lack of adequate policies for financing high-risk activities. The statement argues that the GCF Board should not approve high-risk projects—including large hydropower and infrastructure—until it adopts a full Environmental and Social Management System (ESMS) and a free-standing Indigenous Peoples' Policy aligned with international standards like UNDRIP. The groups demand more rigorous scrutiny for high-risk sub-projects, country-driven proposals, and strict adherence to public disclosure timelines for impact assessments.

Friends of the Earth President Erich Pica calls on 750,000 supporters to vote for candidates who prioritize environmental values. He argues that an environmental majority in the US government is necessary to repeal fossil fuel and nuclear subsidies, protect pollinators from chemicals, and uphold the Clean Power Plan.

Friends of the Earth President Erich Pica issued a statement condemning recent violence in Dallas, Baton Rouge, and Falcon Heights, and affirming the organization's support for the Black Lives Matter movement. The organization pledges to reassess its activism to better address systemic racial oppression and calls on other environmental organizations to prioritize racial and social justice as part of the pursuit of a healthy and just world.

Friends of the Earth has sued the U.S. Coast Guard for failing to provide records of shipping incidents in the Salish Sea from 2009 to 2014. The organization argues that this data is essential for an ongoing vessel traffic risk assessment, particularly as pressure increases to export more oil via the Trans Mountain Pipeline, which could increase tanker traffic from one per week to one per day.

A letter from 112 global organizations argues that current accounting for the $100 billion climate finance goal is flawed. The groups demand that only public grants count toward the target, that private finance not be substituted for public funding, and that accounting be conducted through the inclusive UNFCCC forum rather than exclusive intergovernmental processes.

The author contends that the Bureau of Land Management's coal leasing process is non-competitive and fails to capture fair market value, resulting in a $28.9 billion revenue loss over 30 years. The text calls for a halt to coal lease sales until reforms are implemented, including closing royalty loopholes, incorporating the social cost of carbon into pricing, and updating bonding requirements to protect public health and the environment. It asserts that keeping coal in the ground is the only approach consistent with climate science and the goal of avoiding irreversible climate catastrophe.

The document details the vulnerability of agricultural and forest products to climate change, noting significant potential losses in cocoa, coffee, cotton, and wine production, as well as specific environmental pressures on flower exports from Kenya and silk production in India.

The article highlights the disconnect between public opposition to fossil fuel subsidies and congressional spending priorities. It introduces a 'fossil fuel subsidies tradeoff calculator' created by Friends of the Earth and 13 other groups to illustrate how funds given to 'Big Oil' could instead support social services like Pell grants, park rangers, and veteran healthcare. Specifically, it notes that a 2004 tax break for domestic manufacturers cost taxpayers $656 million last year, which could have funded medical care for 221,622 combat veterans.

The document asserts that the climate movement should shift its focus from 'theories of change' to 'theories of power,' specifically targeting the federal government's existing judicial and regulatory capabilities to curtail the fossil fuel industry.

Friends of the Earth calls on President Obama to reject the Keystone XL pipeline, citing widespread public opposition and the political failure of candidates who supported fossil fuel infrastructure.

The text asserts that the United States possesses renewable energy potential exceeding the requirements of the Clean Power Plan and advocates for a coordinated shift toward wind and solar technologies to prevent long-term dependence on fossil fuels.

The House passed H.R. 2, a package of 13 energy bills that the author claims would expand offshore drilling, deregulate hydraulic fracturing, and support tar sands and oil shale. The document asserts that the bill prioritizes polluters over renewable energy and would likely be vetoed by President Obama.

Janet Thew, a client of Dimensional Fund Advisors (DFA), writes to CEO David Booth to announce her divestment of $100,000 and her call for the firm to stop investing in companies responsible for forest destruction. The letter highlights DFA's significant holdings in palm oil, timber, and pulp and paper producers, arguing that these investments contribute to global warming and biodiversity loss. The author urges DFA to move beyond a passive investment strategy to ensure its portfolios are deforestation-free and to use shareholder power to improve corporate human rights and environmental performance.

The document criticizes the Obama administration's 2017-2022 planning process for offshore oil and gas exploration, arguing that such activities contradict climate goals and threaten marine ecosystems. It highlights the potential for 60 billion tons of carbon dioxide emissions from undiscovered reserves and the risk to marine mammals from seismic surveys. The author calls for a total moratorium on new offshore leasing to ensure the transition to low-carbon energy and to avoid the economic and environmental risks associated with oil spills.

Friends of the Earth condemns President Obama's endorsement of Walmart's sustainability efforts, citing the company's low actual renewable energy usage, failure to meet emissions targets, and a significant criminal fine for toxic pesticide dumping.

Friends of the Earth expresses concern that EU-U.S. trade negotiations may weaken health and environmental safeguards, particularly concerning food safety, GM crops, and chemical regulations. The organization calls for the blocking of the Keystone XL pipeline and the implementation of the EU's Fuel Quality Directive to prevent the proliferation of tar sands. Additionally, it criticizes the 'EU 2030 package' as inadequate and argues that leaders are pursuing a corporate-driven agenda of deregulation rather than investing in energy efficiency and community-owned renewables.

Friends of the Earth and members of Congress are seeking a Government Accountability Office review of the State Department's environmental impact assessment for the Keystone XL pipeline. The request follows allegations that the review vendor, Environmental Resources Management (ERM), failed to disclose financial and professional ties to TransCanada and other oil interests, thereby compromising the integrity of the review process.

Friends of the Earth opposes the Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities Act (HR 3830/S 1900), arguing that its 'Fast Track' authority would shift power from Congress to the executive branch and rush the approval of the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) and Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). The organization contends that these agreements would allow corporations to sue governments for the costs of complying with environmental regulations and could undermine climate measures, such as efforts to block the Keystone XL pipeline or fossil fuel export terminals. Additionally, the document warns that the agreements could inhibit the use of the 'precautionary principle' regarding toxic chemicals and food safety, and potentially lead to the privatization of nature through patents on plants and animals.

Friends of the Earth U.S. supports the walkout of climate activists from COP19 in Warsaw, arguing that developed countries, particularly the U.S., have failed to take necessary action to combat the climate crisis and are instead protecting corporate polluters.

Friends of the Earth opposes the TTIP investment chapter, asserting that investor-state arbitration would allow energy companies to sue governments over climate and environmental regulations, thereby protecting fossil fuel interests and threatening democratic decision-making.