Search Climate Insights Directory

The document outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in Nebraska, asserting that such policies can help the state meet approximately 50% of its carbon pollution reduction goals under the EPA's Clean Power Plan. It projects that by 2030, a combination of 1% annual energy savings, national model building codes, and 40 MWs of new combined heat and power could avoid over 4 million tons of CO2 and save Nebraskans more than $382 million.

The fact sheet outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in New Mexico, stating that specific policies could save residents $645 million and avoid 3.8 million tons of CO2 by 2030.

The document outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in Nevada, stating that achieving annual energy savings of 1% could avoid 2.6 million tons of CO2 and save residents $466 million by 2030.

The fact sheet outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in Ohio, asserting that specific policies could help the state meet 78% of its carbon pollution goals under the EPA's Clean Power Plan and save residents $7.4 billion by 2030.

The document outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in Oklahoma, stating that specific policies could help the state meet 87% of its carbon pollution goals under the EPA's Clean Power Plan. By 2030, a combination of annual energy savings, model building codes, energy service contracts, and 40 MWs of combined heat and power could avoid over 10 million tons of CO2 and save Oklahomans $288 million.

The fact sheet outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency policies in Pennsylvania, asserting that such measures can help the state meet a significant portion of its carbon reduction goals under the EPA's Clean Power Plan while saving residents billions of dollars by 2030.

The document outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in South Carolina, asserting that specific policies could help the state meet nearly half of its carbon pollution goals under the EPA's Clean Power Plan. It highlights that combining private sector energy service contracts, national model building codes, and 100 MWs of new combined heat and power could avoid over 4.8 million tons of CO2 by 2030 and save residents $1.2 billion by the same date.

The fact sheet outlines the potential environmental and economic benefits of energy efficiency in South Dakota, asserting that specific policies could help the state meet its carbon reduction goals under the EPA's Clean Power Plan while saving residents money.

The document outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in Tennessee, asserting that specific policies can help the state meet carbon pollution goals and save residents money.

The document outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in Texas, stating that specific policies could save the state $5.5 billion and significantly reduce carbon and air pollutants by 2030.

The document outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in Utah, stating that specific policies could save residents $5.8 billion on utility bills and avoid 4 million tons of CO2 by 2030.

The document outlines the economic and environmental benefits of adopting energy efficiency policies in Virginia, asserting that such measures can help the state meet 85% of its carbon pollution reduction goals under the EPA’s Clean Power Plan. It highlights that specific interventions—including private sector energy service contracts, national model building codes, and 100 MWs of new combined heat and power—could avoid over 7 million tons of CO2 and save Virginians $1.8 billion by 2030.

This fact sheet outlines the economic and environmental benefits of implementing energy efficiency policies in Wisconsin. It asserts that such measures can help the state meet a significant portion of its carbon pollution goals under the EPA's Clean Power Plan while providing substantial financial savings for residents and government entities.

The document outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in West Virginia, stating that specific policies could save the state $410 million and avoid over 5 million tons of CO2 by 2030. It emphasizes that these measures would assist in meeting 26% of the state's carbon pollution reduction goal under the EPA's Clean Power Plan and significantly reduce nitrogen oxide and sulfur dioxide emissions.

The document outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in Wyoming, specifically highlighting how an annual energy savings target of 1.5%, national model building codes, and 40 MWs of new combined heat and power could avoid 2.6 million tons of CO2 and save residents over $2 billion by 2030.

The provided text is a bibliography or reference list for a fact sheet on climate jobs. It cites 15 sources, including reports from the U.S. Department of Energy, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) reviews by Environmental Entrepreneurs, focusing on clean energy employment, transportation, and adaptation jobs.

In 2024, the United States had more than 4,085,300 climate jobs, with clean energy job creation outpacing fossil fuel job creation. Energy efficiency was the largest sector, supporting nearly 2.4 million jobs, while renewable energy supported 596,100 jobs, dominated by solar and wind. Clean energy storage and grid modernization supported 160,300 jobs. Clean vehicle employment fell by 3% between 2023 and 2024, though renewable fuels remained steady. The adaptation and resilience industry grew by 18% to $4.8 billion in 2024, despite a lack of formal tracking by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Federal legislation including the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) significantly drove investment, although some incentives were weakened or eliminated in 2025.

Lithium is a critical mineral essential for electric vehicle batteries and grid storage, with demand for these applications expected to reach 97% by 2035. While deposits are globally abundant, viable extraction is concentrated in the 'lithium triangle' (Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile) and Australia. The United States relies on imports for over 50% of its consumption as of 2025, with limited domestic production and processing. Extraction and processing cause significant environmental damage, including water depletion in arid regions and toxic contamination, disproportionately affecting Indigenous communities. Recycling remains limited but could potentially reduce the need for new mines by 25% by 2050.

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 introduced "direct pay" (or "elective pay"), allowing tax-exempt entities—such as nonprofits, state and local governments, and tribal governments—to receive direct payments from the IRS in lieu of tax credits for clean energy investments. Eligible credits include a 30% base credit for solar and battery storage, credits for commercial electric vehicles up to $40,000, and credits for alternative fuel infrastructure. Additional bonuses are available for projects in "energy communities," those using "domestic content," or those qualifying for the Low-Income Community Tax Credit. The process involves pre-registering with the IRS and filing specific tax forms, with a total timeline ranging from four to 18 months.

This fact sheet identifies 20 potential sources for hydrogen production and categorizes them by the technical process used to extract or create the gas, ranging from steam methane reforming and gasification to electrolysis and photobiological water splitting.