Search Climate Insights Directory

The Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) green bond market experienced a strong recovery in 2019, largely driven by Chile's first sovereign green bonds. While Brazil, Chile, and Mexico dominate the market, the region shows significant potential for expansion in green infrastructure, sustainable agriculture, and ocean-based 'blue' finance. The report highlights a high prevalence of USD-denominated issuance and a strong reliance on external reviews, though post-issuance reporting varies by issuer size and type.

The green bond market in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) experienced a strong recovery in 2019, driven largely by Chile's first sovereign green bonds. While Brazil, Chile, and Mexico dominate the regional volume, the market is characterized by a high prevalence of US dollar-denominated debt and a significant reliance on private placements. Energy remains the most funded sector, though LAC shows a uniquely high allocation toward land use and industry compared to global trends. The report highlights substantial untapped potential in sustainable agriculture and the 'blue economy' (ocean resources), suggesting that sovereign issuance and multilateral development bank support are key to scaling these markets.

The Q3 2019 green bond market report by the Climate Bonds Initiative tracks global trends in green finance, highlighting the dominance of energy projects in both green bonds and loans, the growth of the Asia-Pacific green loan market, and the leading roles of Euronext Paris as a listing venue and HSBC as an underwriter.

The report highlights the critical need for green infrastructure investment in Vietnam, estimating a requirement of USD31bn by 2020 to align with NDC commitments. It identifies key opportunities across renewable energy, low carbon transport, sustainable water management, and sustainable waste management, while analyzing the current state of green finance in the country. The document argues that while public funding has dominated, there is a significant opportunity to attract private capital through green bonds, public-private partnerships (PPPs), and the support of Development Finance Institutions (DFIs). It provides a sample pipeline of 40 projects and recommends policy changes, such as issuing a green sovereign bond and improving the visibility of green assets, to accelerate the transition.

The Chongqing Three Gorges Bank issued a CNY 3 billion (USD 436.9 million) green bond on 27 December 2018 with a three-year tenor. The proceeds are designated for energy saving, pollution prevention, resource conservation and recycling, clean energy, and ecological protection and adaptation. The Climate Bonds Initiative (CBI) included the bond in its database because hydropower accounts for only 3% of total proceeds and other allocations align with the PBoC catalogue and CBI taxonomy, though the bond may be excluded if future reporting shows the actual use of proceeds fails to meet CBI definitions.

The document outlines the framework for green panda bonds—yuan-denominated bonds issued in mainland China by foreign entities to fund green projects. It details the regulatory roles of the PBoC, CSRC, and NDRC, the requirements for foreign issuers (such as solvency and credit reputation), and the specific steps for issuance, including the need for green asset identification and post-issuance reporting. It highlights that while the market is growing, with China being the second largest green bond market as of October 2018, green panda bonds represent less than 1% of China's total green bonds. The guide also notes the dominance of commercial banks as investors and the role of external verifiers in ensuring alignment with both Chinese and international standards.

The document outlines the framework for 'green panda bonds'—RMB-denominated bonds issued by overseas entities in mainland China for green projects. It details the regulatory landscape involving the PBoC, CSRC, and NDRC, and provides a four-step issuance process: preparation, application for approval, issuance, and continuous disclosure. As of October 2018, China's green bond market reached 60.9 billion USD, with renewable energy accounting for over 60% of supported projects. The guide highlights the role of domestic investors, particularly commercial banks (85% of bond trading), and the alignment of Chinese standards with international benchmarks like the Green Bond Principles and Climate Bonds Standard, while noting differences regarding fossil fuel power generation.

The document explores how green bonds can support Brazil's agricultural sector, noting that while the forestry sector has successfully used these instruments, sustainable agriculture remains underfunded. It highlights the underutilization of government programs like the ABC Program and suggests that securitizing small loans via Certificados de Recebíveis do Agronegócio (CRA) and leveraging bank-issued green bonds could bridge the financing gap for sustainable practices.

The document examines the gap between Brazil's agricultural importance and its limited use of green bonds for the sector, which has been primarily restricted to forestry and paper. It highlights that while government programs like the Low Carbon Agriculture Program (ABC) exist, they are underutilised due to complex application processes and a lack of understanding among financial institutions. The authors argue that green bonds and securitisation tools like Certificates of Agribusiness Receivables (CRA) could scale sustainable financing by aggregating small loans and attracting international capital.

The document outlines the process for foreign entities to issue green panda bonds—RMB-denominated bonds issued in mainland China with proceeds earmarked for green projects. It details the regulatory landscape, involving the PBoC, CSRC, and NDRC, and explains the dual requirement to follow both panda bond and green bond guidelines. The guide highlights the growth of China's green bond market, the role of domestic investors (primarily commercial banks), and the increasing use of RMB for cross-border settlements, particularly within the Belt and Road Initiative. It provides a step-by-step issuance process and lists key regulatory requirements for different market segments.

The document outlines the framework for green panda bonds—Renminbi-denominated bonds issued in mainland China by foreign entities for green projects. It details the regulatory roles of the PBoC, CSRC, and NDRC, the requirements for foreign issuers, and the step-by-step process for issuance, including the need for green frameworks and external reviews. As of October 2018, China was the second largest green bond market globally, with renewable energy accounting for over 60% of allocations.

The report establishes a framework for certifying forestry-related bonds, focusing on ensuring that funded projects contribute to a low-carbon and climate-resilient economy. It defines eligible assets—including plantation forestry, sustainable forest management, and conservation/restoration projects—and sets specific requirements for mitigation and adaptation. Key measures include a prohibition on natural landscape conversion since 2010 and the use of a resilience checklist. The framework leverages existing industry standards, specifically FSC and PEFC, as proxies for many management requirements while adding specific climate-risk assessments.

Ernst & Young conducted a reasonable assurance engagement for the Treasury Corporation of NSW (TCorp) regarding its 2018 Green Bond pre-issuance and Sustainability Bond Framework. The assessment focused on the use and management of proceeds, project evaluation and selection, and reporting procedures. EY concluded that TCorp's processes and nominated projects meet the requirements of the ICMA Sustainability Bond Guidelines and the CBI Climate Bond Standard v2.1 in all material respects. Specific nominated projects include the Newcastle Light Rail, Sydney Metro Northwest, and Quakers Hill and St Mary's Water Recycling Plants.

ISS-oekom conducted a pre-issuance verification of EnBW's 2018 Green Bond against the Climate Bonds Standard (Version 2.1) and specific sector criteria for wind, solar, low carbon transport, and marine renewable energy. Following a desk-based assessment of project selection, internal controls, and reporting processes, ISS-oekom concluded that the bond is in conformance with the required standards.

Vigeo Eiris conducted a limited assurance engagement in September and October 2018, concluding that Royal Schiphol Group's 2018 first Green Bond is in conformance with the Climate Bonds Standard version 2.1. The bond's proceeds are intended to finance low carbon emissions vehicles, charging infrastructure, and the construction or refurbishment of low carbon buildings. The verification confirmed that the nominated assets meet the technical criteria for Low Carbon Buildings and Low Carbon Land Transport, though the verifier noted that the lack of quantified contributions to corporate sustainability objectives and the absence of a commitment to periodic assurance engagements are areas for improvement.

In Q3 2018, China's green bond market saw $8.5 billion in issuances, with financial institutions accounting for 51% of the total. While total issuance for the first three quarters of 2018 ($21.5 billion) exceeded the same period in 2017, only 49% of Q3 issuances aligned with international green bond definitions. Renewable energy remained the largest investment area, while water-related projects saw an increase in funding share to 18%. The report also details updated Climate Bonds Initiative (CBI) classification criteria for underground utility tunnels and hydropower projects to better align with the People's Bank of China's guidelines.

The report analyzes China's green bond market in Q3 2018, noting a total issuance of USD 8.5bn. It highlights that while total issuance for the first three quarters of 2018 (USD 21.5bn) exceeded the same period in 2017, only 49% of Q3 volumes aligned with international definitions. Financial corporates dominated issuance, and renewable energy remained the largest sector for proceeds. The document also details new regulatory guidelines from the PBoC, SSE, and CSRC, and updates to the Climate Bonds Initiative (CBI) taxonomy regarding utility tunnels and hydropower.

The Climate Bonds Initiative (CBI) employs a three-step screening process to identify and validate green bonds and loans for its database. This involves identifying self-labeled green instruments, verifying alignment with the Climate Bonds Taxonomy across eight sectors, and ensuring at least 95% of proceeds are allocated to eligible green assets. The methodology explicitly excludes fossil fuel energy and projects that extend the life of fossil fuel assets. Instruments are categorized as included, pending, or excluded, with a mechanism for reclassification based on new data or updated scientific criteria.

The Climate Bonds Initiative (CBI) employs a three-step screening process to identify eligible green bonds and loans for its database: identifying green-labelled bonds, screening assets against the Climate Bonds Taxonomy, and evaluating the allocation of proceeds. To be included, a bond must allocate at least 95% of its proceeds to aligned green assets; any bond where more than 5% of proceeds are used for working capital, social projects, or non-aligned assets is excluded. The methodology explicitly excludes fossil fuel energy and any assets that extend the life of fossil fuel usage, such as 'clean coal'. The Climate Bonds Taxonomy covers eight categories: energy, transport, buildings, water management, waste management & pollution control, nature-based assets, industry & energy-intensive commercial, and information technology & communications (ICT).

ISS-oekom conducted a desk-based assessment of Encavis AG's Green Schuldschein against the Climate Bond Standard Version 2.1 and the Solar Energy Standard version 2.1. The verification focused on the selection of nominated projects and assets, internal processes and controls, and proposed reporting. Based on limited assurance procedures, ISS-oekom concluded that the Green Schuldschein is in conformance with the Pre-Issuance Requirements.