Search Climate Insights Directory

This document is an executive summary and a corresponding minute extract from a May 13, 2011, submission to Eskom's Board Sustainability, Social, Ethics and Safety Committee. It provides an update on the implementation of Eskom's Air Quality Strategy, approved in November 2010, and reports the results of ambient air quality monitoring for the 2011 financial year.

This document is an executive summary and supporting materials for a February 2013 submission to the Eskom Board Sustainability Committee regarding Eskom's environmental management performance from April to December 2012. It details failures to meet emissions and water targets due to operational constraints, progress on environmental strategies, and the status of ISO 14001 certification across various business units.

This March 2013 executive summary and accompanying board minutes detail Eskom's 'Environmental Compliance and Performance Journey Map'. The document outlines a strategy to address systemic environmental non-compliance, specifically regarding air emissions, water usage, and biodiversity, while acknowledging that production pressures and resource constraints have hindered the utility's ability to meet statutory standards.

This briefing document, submitted to the Eskom Board Sustainability Committee on 2 August 2013, outlines the company's inability to fully comply with South Africa's National Emission Standards without jeopardizing its sustainability. It proposes a strategy of partial compliance through targeted retrofits, legal applications for exemptions and postponements, and requests to continue operating non-compliant power stations while implementing remedies.

This document is an executive summary and board submission from Eskom dated August 28, 2013, regarding compliance with South Africa's National Emission Standards and Atmospheric Emission Licences (AELs). It outlines the financial and operational impossibility of full compliance by 2020, proposes a partial compliance strategy, and requests permission to continue operating several power stations that are currently in breach of their emission limits.

This executive summary and accompanying board minutes from October 2013 detail Eskom's struggle to balance environmental compliance with financial and technical constraints. The document highlights significant funding gaps for emission standards and critical maintenance, the risk of criminal liability for leadership, and a specific crisis regarding the Kriel power station's non-compliance with particulate emissions.

This document is an executive summary and submission to the Eskom Board Audit and Risk Committee, dated February 10, 2014, providing an update on environmental performance and compliance as of December 2013. It details key performance indicators for water and emissions, legal contraventions, and significant risks regarding Atmospheric Emission Licences, specifically focusing on the Kriel power station and the potential for production losses across multiple power stations due to strict new emission standards.

This executive summary, submitted to Eskom's Board Investment and Finance Committee on 7 March 2014, outlines the capital requirements and risks associated with meeting Minimum Emission Standards (MES). It details a phased financial plan to achieve partial and full environmental compliance, while highlighting the potential for production losses and legal non-compliance at several power stations due to the removal of emission exemptions.

This document is an excerpt from Eskom's Air Quality Strategy, detailing the company's plan to align its power station emissions with the South African Minimum Emission Standards (MES). It outlines specific emission targets for particulate matter, sulphur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides, while identifying significant resource constraints—including water, sorbent availability, and financial costs—that necessitate a phased and prioritised approach to retrofitting abatement technologies.

The Appeals Registrar of the Nkangala District Municipality has directed that the issue of the municipality's jurisdiction to hear an appeal regarding an atmospheric emission license for ACWA Power must be resolved before any Pre-Appeal Hearing. The Registrar set deadlines for Heads of Argument in November 2018, with a final decision expected by 23 November 2018.

The document examines a legal dispute between claimholders in the Du Toit’s Pan Mine in Griqualand West. The appellant, Reid, alleged that De Beers Consolidated Mines allowed water to overflow and flood his claims. The court ultimately dismissed the appeal, ruling that there is no common law duty for a mining company to continue working a claim solely to prevent damage to another claimholder, and that the cessation of work does not inherently constitute negligence or a nuisance.

A Remediation Order issued by the South African Department of Environmental Affairs to ArcelorMittal South Africa Limited for the cleanup of contaminated land at its Vanderbijlpark Works.

A letter from the IPP Office to Robyn Hugo of the Centre for Environmental Rights (CER) acknowledging a letter dated 18 October 2016 and a legal application (case number 65662/16) regarding Thabametsi Power Company (Pty) Limited's status as a preferred bidder in the Coal Baseload IPP Procurement Programme.

This document is a formal response from the South African Department of Environmental Affairs to a notice issued by the Centre for Environmental Rights (CER) under Section 28(12) of the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA), 1998. The CER had requested that the Department direct ArcelorMittal South Africa (AMSA) to address pollution and environmental degradation at its Vanderbijlpark operations. The Department declined to issue a new directive, arguing that existing measures—including a Remediation Order, waste management licenses, and compliance notices—are sufficient to address the concerns.

A letter from the South African Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment to the Centre for Environmental Rights regarding expert analysis of air quality and health impacts from Eskom's Kendal Power Station.

A letter from the Independent Power Producer (IPP) Office responding to the Centre for Environmental Rights regarding the Coal Baseload IPP Procurement Programme and the Thabametsi Power Company.

This document consists of correspondence from the Independent Power Producer (IPP) Office to the Centre for Environmental Rights regarding the Coal Baseload IPP Procurement Programme, specifically addressing preferred bidders for the Thabametsi, Khanyisa, and KiPower coal-fired power stations.

This document is a formal response from the South African Department of Mineral Resources and Energy to a request for access to information submitted by the Centre for Environmental Rights under the Promotion of Access to Information Act 2 of 2000. The response addresses requests for the Plexos modelling data, technology costs, and scenario outputs used to develop the Integrated Resource Plan for Electricity of 17 October 2019 (IRP 2019).

The case Rex v Marshall & Another [1951] confirmed the convictions of the manager and resident engineer of Natal Cambrian Collieries Ltd for violating Regulation 7(2) of the Mines and Works Regulations, 1937. The court found that the mine had allowed water containing injurious matter to escape without treatment, contaminating a stream that affected lower-lying farms. The court rejected defense arguments that the regulation was void for vagueness, unreasonableness, or ultra vires, ruling that 'injurious' water is that which is unfit for human or animal consumption, dangerous to animal life, or unsuitable for irrigation.

This document is a legal notice filed in the High Court of South Africa on May 21, 2014, by Sasol Synfuels (Pty) Ltd, National Petroleum Refiners of South Africa (Pty) Ltd, and Sasol Infrachem. The applicants challenge the constitutionality of minimum emission standards published by the Minister of Water and Environmental Affairs under the National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act 39 of 2004.