Search Climate Insights Directory

The report projects substantial warming and shifting precipitation patterns for the US Midwest, with extreme heat events and heavy rainfall becoming more frequent. Under a higher emissions scenario, end-of-century temperatures could rise by up to 10°F, significantly increasing the frequency of severe heat waves and reducing snow cover. While annual precipitation may only increase slightly, winter and spring are expected to become wetter, while summer precipitation may decrease under higher emissions. These changes are projected to increase heat-related mortality and flooding risks across the region.

The report provides a state-by-state breakdown of progress toward 2020 Clean Power Plan benchmarks, noting that some states have exceeded 500% of their goals while others show 0% progress. It highlights the role of energy efficiency, renewable energy standards, and regional initiatives in achieving these targets.

The document outlines a 'funnel' process for wind resource assessment, moving from general wind maps to site-specific measurements. It emphasizes that wind energy production is approximately proportional to the square of wind speed, meaning small estimation errors can lead to significant financial losses. The guide details the use of wind power classes, the impact of wind shear on tower height selection, and the importance of analyzing year-to-year wind variability to satisfy lender requirements. It also provides specific siting advice regarding wind roses, turbine wake effects, and the use of set-backs or easements to protect wind access.

The Union of Concerned Scientists finds that increasing Wisconsin's renewable electricity standard to 25% by 2025 is achievable and affordable. Under the most likely 'No Hydro Imports' scenario, the state would see a $59 million reduction in electricity bills (when accounting for carbon savings), the creation of 2,650 new jobs, and a reduction in CO2 emissions equivalent to removing 2.1 million cars from the road. The analysis highlights Wisconsin's significant technical potential in wind, solar, and biomass to meet these targets while reducing reliance on imported fossil fuels.

The document presents the first estimates of manufacturing subsector-specific energy use for the 10 member states of the Midwestern Governors Association (MGA). It aims to fill a data gap where public sources only provide general manufacturing data, thereby enabling policymakers to better identify energy efficiency potential and strategies that balance environmental and economic outcomes. The paper combines energy-use data with state-by-state policy summaries to highlight trends in industrial energy efficiency and cost competitiveness.

The report analyzes greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio, and Wisconsin. Utilizing the World Resources Institute's Climate Analysis Indicators Tool (CAIT-US), it examines all six Kyoto GHGs across the regional economy to overcome inconsistencies in previous state-level inventories. The analysis covers regional, sectoral, and state levels, assessing major emission sources, trends, and socioeconomic drivers to inform stakeholders on the Midwest's role in global climate change.

WRI analysis indicates that Wisconsin could reduce CO2 emissions by 43% below 2011 levels by 2020 by extending clean energy policies and optimizing existing infrastructure, which would surpass hypothetical EPA reduction requirements of 28% to 33%.

Wisconsin can achieve 63 percent of its Clean Power Plan (CPP) emission reductions by continuing the Focus on Energy program, maintaining its renewable portfolio standard, and improving the efficiency of natural gas and coal plants. To close the remaining gap and exceed targets, the state could increase efficiency targets to 2.5 percent by 2025 and renewable generation to 30 percent by 2030. The document argues that adopting a market-based carbon pricing program could generate over $100 million annually from out-of-state sources between 2022 and 2030 if allowances trade at $10 per short ton. Additionally, investments in energy efficiency via Focus on Energy provided a 3:1 benefit ratio from 2011-14, saving homes and businesses $1.7 billion.

The guide details five financial tools to facilitate energy efficiency: on-bill financing, Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) financing, Sustainable Energy Utility (SEU) models, loan guarantees, and loan loss reserve funds. It highlights how public investment can reduce lender risk to mobilize private capital, providing specific examples from the United States, Canada, and China.

The document details WEPCO's transition toward a more proactive environmental posture, highlighted by its 'Wisconsin Commitment' and demand-side management programs. Despite national awards and strong executive support, a 1991 benchmarking study by A.T. Kearney revealed critical gaps, including the lack of a comprehensive risk assessment program and a disconnect between the company's external environmental image and its internal operational rigor.

The document highlights the cost-effectiveness of energy efficiency programs in the U.S., citing specific utility savings in Minnesota, New Mexico, and Arkansas, and economic projections for Massachusetts and Wisconsin. It advocates for scaling up federal appliance standards, updating building codes, and implementing financing mechanisms like PACE and green banks to increase adoption.

Xcel Energy's Certified Renewable Percentage (CRP) program enables customers to account for the renewable energy already present in the local grid mix by retiring Renewable Energy Credits (RECs) on their behalf. Launched in Wisconsin and Minnesota, with pending approval in Colorado, the program allows cities and corporations to combine grid-based renewable credits with voluntary purchases, such as the Renewable*Connect program, to reach goals of up to 100% renewable energy. The program's application varies by state based on tariff structures, and Xcel Energy provides calculator tools to help customers determine their specific renewable percentages.

The report analyzes food loss in the US specialty crop sector, contrasting the high loss rates of the fresh market with the relatively lower rates of the vertically integrated processing market. It highlights how contract-based purchasing and mechanical harvesting in the processing sector reduce in-field waste, while the fresh market suffers from strict cosmetic standards and labor shortages. The document proposes using real-time measurement and alternative harvesting models, such as the Whole Crops Harvest pilot, to rescue surplus produce for secondary markets and donations.