Search Climate Insights Directory

California's bottle bill, once successful with 85% recycling rates, has seen redemption rates fall to 66% due to the closure of recycling centers. This has resulted in consumers receiving only 2.65 cents of their 5-cent deposit on average, with $400 million in deposits failing to return to residents annually. A YouGov poll from March 2020 indicates 37% of Californians are unaware of the bill and 53% do not use redemption centers. The COVID-19 pandemic has further decreased onsite redemption. The document proposes reforming the system using "no-touch" reverse vending machines (RVMs) and bag-drop systems, and increasing the number of redemption sites. It suggests using part of the $400 million in the Beverage Container Recycling Fund for modernization. A system with a 90% redemption rate could provide $1.2 billion in annual refunds to residents, secure 8,000 existing jobs, and create 5,000 new ones. The briefing references a study by Eunomia Research & Consulting comparing California to best-in-class systems in Oregon, Michigan, Norway, and Germany.

The briefing highlights a crisis in California's bottle bill, where redemption rates have fallen to 66% due to the closure of over 1,200 recycling centers between 2013 and 2019. It proposes reforming the system by implementing 'no-touch' reverse vending machines (RVMs) and bag-drop systems, and expanding the scope to include wine and liquor containers. According to analysis by Eunomia Research & Consulting, moving to a 'best-in-class' (BiC) system with a 96% redemption rate would create 5,000 additional jobs, save 400,000 metric tons of GHG emissions annually, and significantly reduce plastic and aluminum litter in the environment and oceans.

The document highlights the economic importance of the beer industry and the risks posed by climate change to barley, hops, and water supplies. It details adaptation efforts, such as the development of drought-resistant crops and water preservation partnerships, alongside operational sustainability measures like using recycled glass and clean energy.

The document outlines a variety of U.S. federal programs—spanning the EPA, FEMA, HUD, NOAA, USDA, and USFWS—that provide grants, loans, and technical support for nature-based solutions. These projects, such as wetland restoration, green roofs, and urban forestry, are designed to reduce climate-related hazards like flooding and heat waves while providing carbon sequestration and economic co-benefits. The fact sheet details the eligibility and specific applications of these resources, illustrating their use through examples in cities and states across the U.S.

The document outlines federal resources for nature-based solutions (NbS), which include green and natural infrastructure designed to increase resilience to climate impacts like flooding and extreme heat. It details specific programs from agencies such as the EPA, FEMA, HUD, NOAA, USDA, and USFWS, highlighting their eligibility criteria and providing real-world examples of projects, such as wetland restoration in California and urban forestry in Oregon. The text emphasizes that NbS can be more cost-effective than traditional engineered projects and provide co-benefits like carbon sequestration and improved water quality.

A coalition of national environmental organizations is calling on the Governor of New York to sign Senate bill S5343, which would phase in a ban on the pesticide chlorpyrifos over two years. The organizations cite evidence that the chemical harms children's brain development and jeopardizes 1,200 endangered species, noting that the Trump administration blocked a federal ban despite EPA findings that children are exposed to the chemical on food at levels 140 times higher than safe limits.

The report argues that a negative feedback loop exists in the United States where restrictive voting laws and partisan gerrymandering insulate legislators from accountability, leading to the adoption of policies that exacerbate public health disparities. Using data from America's Health Rankings and the Cost of Voting Index, the author finds that states with greater partisan bias and higher barriers to voting are associated with lower life expectancy and more severe health declines between 2010 and 2017. Specifically, the report links extreme gerrymandering to higher increases in opioid deaths among African Americans in high-poverty states and higher infant mortality for non-Hispanic black communities. To break this cycle, the document recommends reforms to reduce the costs of eligibility (such as automatic voter registration), reduce the costs of casting a vote (such as early in-person voting), and protect the equal value of votes through independent redistricting commissions and public campaign financing.

The document argues that current NDCs insufficiently address the transport sector, which accounts for approximately one-quarter of energy-related CO2 emissions. It advocates for a comprehensive approach based on the "Avoid-Shift-Improve" framework: avoiding unnecessary travel through land-use planning, shifting to low-carbon modes like public transit and cycling, and improving vehicle technology via electrification and fuel efficiency. The authors identify three primary opportunities for NDC enhancement: accelerating electrification and fuel economy, amplifying avoid-and-shift measures, and addressing freight emissions through clean fuels and information technology.

Following 2019 legislation to decarbonize Colorado's electricity sector, the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) must investigate whether transitioning to performance-based regulation (PBR) is 'net beneficial'. The briefing suggests that the PUC should utilize scenario analysis and collaborative stakeholder processes, drawing on examples from Hawaii, Minnesota, and Oregon to align utility incentives with goals such as emissions reductions and cost-efficiency.

The report argues that traditional quasi-judicial regulatory processes are inadequate for the scale of current electricity system transformations and proposes a four-stage framework—initiation, vision communication, conduction, and delivery of outcomes—to achieve more successful reforms.

The research analyzes six international water quality offset programs to determine how regulated dischargers can offset excess pollutant loads against reductions made elsewhere in a watershed. The study specifically aims to provide design and implementation lessons for Manitoba, where over 200 wastewater treatment facilities contribute to the eutrophication of Lake Winnipeg.

The report analyzes six water quality trading (WQT) and offset programs—including the Lake Simcoe Phosphorus Offsetting Program, the Lake Taupō nitrogen trading program, and the Tualatin River program—to derive lessons for Manitoba. It identifies that successful programs typically require a regulatory cap on pollutant discharges and significant variations in abatement costs between point sources (PS) and nonpoint sources (NPS). Key findings emphasize the importance of load-based rather than concentration-based regulations, the use of offset ratios to account for uncertainty and time lags, and the necessity of engaging agricultural producers through trusted intermediaries and simplified procedures. The report also highlights 'credit stacking,' where landowners receive multiple payments for combined benefits, such as nitrogen reduction and carbon sequestration, as a driver for program uptake.

The document details how rising temperatures in Oregon are increasing the frequency and cost of wildfires, reducing mountain snowpack, and causing ocean acidification. It highlights the vulnerability of the state's $48 billion agriculture, forestry, and fishery sectors and recommends a transition to a clean energy economy through carbon pricing and renewable energy adoption.

The document highlights that transportation accounts for 43 percent of Washington's global warming pollution. It advocates for a clean fuel standard to transition from imported petroleum to locally produced low-carbon alternatives, including electric vehicles (EVs), biomethane, and various biofuels. The report emphasizes the economic benefits of keeping fuel spending within the state and the potential for Washington to lead in sustainable aviation fuels.

The document highlights the environmental benefits of mass timber over steel and concrete, specifically noting significant reductions in CO2 emissions per square foot of floor assembly. It showcases various projects in Washington and Oregon, including residential, office, and school buildings, while calling for new building codes and national action to support the adoption of mass timber and sustainable forest practices like restorative thinning.

The ACLU is urging Endeavour Capital to exit its investment in Aladdin Bail Bonds and Seaview Insurance. The ACLU argues that for-profit bail bonds create cycles of debt that disproportionately affect Black, Latino, and low-income communities. The document highlights Aladdin's financial efforts to oppose reform in California and its attempts to establish commercial bail in Oregon and New Mexico.

Endeavour Capital's recent funds (V, VI, and VII) have underperformed peers in quartile rankings and capital distribution (DPI) as of 2017-2018. The firm's returns are heavily dependent on internal valuations, with specific portfolio companies like Aladdin Bail Bonds and ZOOM+Care facing regulatory and insolvency challenges.

The report finds that Endeavour Capital's Funds V, VI, and VII have underperformed their peers in terms of quartile rankings and capital return rates as of early 2018. It highlights significant risks within its portfolio, including the impact of bail reform on Aladdin Bail Bonds, financial instability and regulatory issues at ZOOM+Care, and poor student outcomes and federal funding reliance at Southern Careers Institute.

The document outlines four key actions for state, provincial, and regional governments to address land use's role in climate change: sustainable land management, open space conservation, agricultural methane capture, and regenerative agriculture. It emphasizes that land use is best managed at the subnational level to capture rural impacts and cross-jurisdictional effects, noting that while agriculture, forestry, and other land use account for 24% of global emissions, the sector can offset this by 20% through carbon removal.

The document outlines six key actions for regional governments to decarbonize mobility: expanding electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure, electrifying commercial and government fleets, implementing clean vehicle manufacturing standards, improving freight delivery efficiency, investing in public transit, and promoting non-motorized travel alternatives.