Search Climate Insights Directory

The document analyzes three generations of unconstitutional power shifts in Africa, from post-independence coups to modern manipulations of term limits and 'models' of military intervention. It argues that while Regional Economic Communities (RECs) like ECOWAS and SADC have the potential to mitigate these trends through sanctions and democratic protocols, their effectiveness is hindered by state sovereignty, inconsistent implementation of laws, and the influence of powerful regional leaders who support usurpers. The authors recommend that RECs focus on root causes—such as socioeconomic stagnation and weak institutions—and encourage the ratification of the AU Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance.

The Montreal Protocol successfully phased out the production of ozone-depleting substances (ODSs), but failed to address the global warming potential of existing ODS banks and the rapid growth of hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) substitutes. ODS banks, if not controlled, risk releasing significant greenhouse gases, while HFC emissions are projected to increase substantially by 2050, particularly in developing countries. The document examines policy options such as the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009, producer responsibility programs in other developed nations, and proposals to expand the Montreal Protocol's mandate to include HFCs.

The document examines the 'vicious circle' of underdevelopment in Africa, characterized by commodity dependence, poor infrastructure, and limited global trade integration. It analyzes the failures of the multilateral trading system (WTO) and the limitations of preferential schemes like the EU's 'Everything but Arms' (EBA) and the US's 'African Growth and Opportunity Act' (AGOA). The authors argue that while regional integration is often promoted, it frequently benefits only the strongest economies in a group. The paper concludes that Africa must improve its supply-side capacity—specifically physical infrastructure and trade financing—while the EU should reform its standards and ODA strategies to better support African exporters.

The document analyzes how China's decentralization and internationalization have empowered its provinces to act as multilayered foreign policy actors in Africa. It details their roles in trade, construction, investment, and aid, noting that while they often act as agents of the central government, they increasingly pursue independent economic interests. The authors argue that this subnational engagement facilitates deeper Sino-African relations but can also create diplomatic friction due to labor disputes and unethical business practices. The paper suggests that African nations should adopt a multilevel approach to engagement by partnering directly with Chinese provinces to attract investment and share developmental expertise.

The author argues that the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) in South Africa missed a critical opportunity for public engagement because the government, specifically through the office of Minister Geraldine Fraser-Moleketi, centralized and dominated the process. This centralization marginalized civil society and the media, leading to a lack of transparency and public interest. The paper highlights the tension between the Sunday Times, which attempted critical coverage of the process, and the government, which reacted defensively to reports on national failures such as crime and child safety. It concludes that for the APRM to be an effective policy tool, governments must adopt a less defensive posture, ensure genuine transparency, and actively engage the media to translate complex reports into public-interest news.

The paper examines the requirements for effective anti-corruption systems, particularly in new democracies and developing countries. It argues against relying solely on a single anti-corruption agency, suggesting instead a matrix of legal and oversight institutions. The author emphasizes that political will and ethical leadership are the most difficult but essential components for success. The text highlights the role of data in targeting resources and the importance of a partnership approach, citing South Africa's National Anti-Corruption Forum as an example, while cautioning that such partnerships must not undermine the ability of civil society to hold the government accountable.

The paper examines the requirements for sustainable anti-corruption reforms, emphasizing that single-agency approaches are often insufficient. It advocates for a matrix of legal and supervisory institutions, the use of objective institutional audits like the Global Integrity Index, and the necessity of political will to prevent the weaponization of anti-corruption efforts against political opponents. The author highlights the role of civil society and independent media in maintaining accountability and provides examples of both successful and failed initiatives in South Africa, Kenya, and Nigeria.

The paper examines the relationship between elections and democracy, arguing that while elections are primary prerequisites for democracy, they are often used in Africa as 'window-dressing rituals' to legitimate existing regimes. It analyzes various electoral systems, the critical role of independent electoral commissions, judiciaries, and militaries, and the functions of international and domestic observation. Additionally, it explores the nature of African political parties, noting their tendency to be ethnically based, personalized, and non-institutionalized.

The research paper examines the 'Anti-Third Term Campaign' in Zambia (2000-2001), detailing how a broad coalition called the Oasis Forum—comprising lawyers, religious leaders, MPs, and NGOs—mobilized public opposition to President Frederick Chiluba's attempt to bypass constitutional term limits. It describes the government's use of District Administrators to intimidate dissenters and the counter-strategies used by activists, such as the 'Cathedral Declaration' and public symbols of defiance. The paper concludes that the campaign's success was due to a simple message, strong leadership, and mass mobilization, offering these as lessons for other governance processes like the African Peer Review Mechanism.

The research paper examines the 2000-2001 Zambian campaign against President Frederick Chiluba's attempt to secure a third term. It details the government's use of District Administrators to intimidate opponents and the subsequent formation of the Forum Oasis—a coalition of lawyers, religious leaders, and activists. The document highlights the effectiveness of diverse mobilization tactics, such as the use of green ribbons and independent media, and provides lessons for future civic activism and the African Peer Review Mechanism.

The document details the efforts of the Open Democracy Advice Centre (ODAC) to influence South Africa's African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) process between 2004 and 2008. It argues that the South African government attempted to control the process by excluding specialist NGOs, staffing the National Governing Council (NGC) with government officials, and conducting final drafting of the Country Self-Assessment Report (CSAR) and Programme of Action (POA) behind closed doors. Despite these obstacles, ODAC successfully lobbied for the inclusion of access to information and whistleblower protection in the final binding POA, although the authors note that many of their specific detailed recommendations were omitted.

The report details the struggle of the Open Democracy Advice Centre (ODAC) to integrate transparency and anti-corruption safeguards into South Africa's African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) process. Despite facing government attempts to control the process and exclude specialized NGOs, ODAC successfully lobbied for the inclusion of access to information and whistleblower protection in the final Plan of Action (PA). The document highlights systemic issues in the South African process, including the over-representation of government officials in the National Governance Council and the opaque nature of final document revisions.

The document serves as a practical guide for Technical Research Institutes (TRIs) tasked with conducting the self-assessment phase of the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM). It details the roles of TRIs, the challenges of using the 88-page APRM questionnaire, and the necessity of balancing technical objectivity with the political sensitivities of participating African governments. The handbook offers specific methodologies for gathering expert and public opinion, vetting desk research sources, and managing the logistical and political pressures of the process. It concludes by suggesting that TRIs expand their role beyond the initial report to monitor the implementation of Programmes of Action (PoA).

The document outlines the role of Technical Research Institutions (TRIs) in the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM), specifically in producing National Self-Assessment Reports (NSARs). It details the challenges of managing complex research under tight deadlines, the necessity of balancing technical accuracy with political sensitivities, and provides a comprehensive methodology for data collection, source vetting, and questionnaire adaptation. The guide emphasizes the importance of public participation and the strategic development of Action Plans to ensure that the APRM leads to measurable policy reform.

The paper argues that foreign direct investment in Africa is often driven by natural resources rather than good governance or low corruption. While countries with poor governance rankings often attract significant FDI, the author contends that sound governance is necessary for long-term resource management and sustainable economic growth.

The report analyzes the Westminster-style parliamentary system and electoral model of Mauritius, including the role of the opposition and the engagement between the executive, parliament, and civil society.

The paper argues that the current trend of African countries belonging to multiple regional entities simultaneously is unsustainable, particularly as these groups move from free trade areas to customs unions. Because a country cannot realistically apply two different common external tariffs, overlapping memberships create legal contradictions and increased transaction costs. The author proposes four potential scenarios for rationalisation: equal sharing of members, a merger of SACU and SADC, the dominance of COMESA, or the creation of a single large regional trading bloc aligned with the African Union's goal of an African Economic Community by 2025.

The author argues that political opposition in SADC countries is structurally marginalized due to the fusion of liberation parties with the state and economy. This creates an environment where the electorate remains unresponsive to government failure, and potential opposition talent is deterred by the risks of alienating ruling elites or the lure of government and corporate employment.

The author criticizes the Southern African Development Community (SADC) for its premature declaration that Mozambique's December 2004 elections were 'free and fair' before the vote-counting process was complete. While other observer missions, including the EU and the Carter Centre, waited for final results to avoid the transparency issues seen in 1999, SADC's haste suggests a reluctance to criticize sitting member governments. This pattern, combined with SADC's support for the Zimbabwean government despite flawed elections, risks framing the organization as a club of ruling parties rather than a credible democratic umpire.

The report details a scoping workshop held in Johannesburg in October 2010 to launch the APRM Monitoring Project (AMP). The project seeks to empower civil society organisations (CSOs) in Southern Africa to track the implementation of National Programmes of Action (NPoA) through the APRM Monitoring & Advocacy Template (AMAT). The workshop identified challenges such as limited CSO resources, low public visibility of the APRM, and the need for collaborative rather than antagonistic relationships with governments. Lessons from Uganda's NGO Forum highlighted the value of aligning APRM monitoring with existing governance networks. The workshop concluded with a consensus on the need for an independent, inclusive, and grassroots-oriented review process.