Search Climate Insights Directory

The paper examines the methodological requirements for conducting credible representative public opinion surveys within the framework of the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM). It contrasts the limitations of 'participatory' consultations—which often suffer from self-selection bias—with the precision of random probability sampling. The author provides technical guidance on sample sizes, the necessity of accurate census data, and the importance of sampling individual citizens rather than household heads. It also outlines the practical costs and timelines for implementing such surveys in Africa, suggesting that national surveys of 1,200 respondents typically cost between $85,000 and $125,000.

The paper examines the requirements for sustainable anti-corruption reforms, emphasizing that single-agency approaches are often insufficient. It advocates for a matrix of legal and supervisory institutions, the use of objective institutional audits like the Global Integrity Index, and the necessity of political will to prevent the weaponization of anti-corruption efforts against political opponents. The author highlights the role of civil society and independent media in maintaining accountability and provides examples of both successful and failed initiatives in South Africa, Kenya, and Nigeria.

The document is a publication catalog from the WRI Institutions and Governance Program, detailing research on the structure and outcomes of natural resource decentralizations. It lists reports, journal articles, and working papers stemming from a 2001 comparative project and subsequent initiatives focused on institutional choice, recognition, and commodity chain analysis. The research covers a wide array of countries across Africa, Asia, and Latin America, examining the intersection of local democracy, property rights, and environmental governance.

The paper examines the relationship between elections and democracy, arguing that while elections are primary prerequisites for democracy, they are often used in Africa as 'window-dressing rituals' to legitimate existing regimes. It analyzes various electoral systems, the critical role of independent electoral commissions, judiciaries, and militaries, and the functions of international and domestic observation. Additionally, it explores the nature of African political parties, noting their tendency to be ethnically based, personalized, and non-institutionalized.

The research paper examines the 'Anti-Third Term Campaign' in Zambia (2000-2001), detailing how a broad coalition called the Oasis Forum—comprising lawyers, religious leaders, MPs, and NGOs—mobilized public opposition to President Frederick Chiluba's attempt to bypass constitutional term limits. It describes the government's use of District Administrators to intimidate dissenters and the counter-strategies used by activists, such as the 'Cathedral Declaration' and public symbols of defiance. The paper concludes that the campaign's success was due to a simple message, strong leadership, and mass mobilization, offering these as lessons for other governance processes like the African Peer Review Mechanism.

The document outlines how civil society organizations (CSOs) can move beyond the perception of parliaments as rubber-stamp bodies to actively influence policy. It emphasizes the importance of understanding electoral systems—noting that single-member districts often produce more independent legislators—and the necessity of providing non-partisan, evidence-based information to resource-constrained parliamentarians. The author advocates for building long-term relationships with 'champions' within the ruling party, maintaining organizational transparency to ensure credibility, and using media and public pressure to support legislative goals.

The research paper examines the 2000-2001 Zambian campaign against President Frederick Chiluba's attempt to secure a third term. It details the government's use of District Administrators to intimidate opponents and the subsequent formation of the Forum Oasis—a coalition of lawyers, religious leaders, and activists. The document highlights the effectiveness of diverse mobilization tactics, such as the use of green ribbons and independent media, and provides lessons for future civic activism and the African Peer Review Mechanism.

The document examines the 'education crisis' in Sub-Saharan Africa, arguing that the narrow focus on the UN Millennium Development Goals' target of universal primary education has compromised teaching quality and diverted funds from secondary and tertiary levels. It highlights critical barriers to progress, including the HIV/AIDS epidemic, severe teacher shortages, outdated colonial curricula, and gender disparities. The report contends that without systemic reforms—including better teacher training, increased investment in science and mathematics, and a shift toward vocational and secondary education—the region will remain economically marginalised and unable to compete globally.

The paper examines the tendency of executive branches in Africa to monopolize power, attributing this to inherited colonial structures and a lack of institutional capacity. It highlights how the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) has exposed these governance deficiencies. The author argues that while formal separation of powers exists, it is undermined by political realities and a culture of the 'Big Man'. To counter this, the document advocates for empowering civil society with information to hold the executive accountable and bolstering the independence and resources of the legislature and judiciary.

The document analyzes the tendency of executive branches in African governments to monopolize power, often resulting in the 'big man' cult of personality. It argues that while constitutional frameworks for the separation of powers exist, they are frequently undermined by political realities, lack of resources, and colonial legacies. The author suggests that effective legislative and judicial bodies, supported by an informed and active civil society, are essential to curbing executive abuse and ensuring good governance.

Africa faces a severe road infrastructure crisis, with 90% of passengers and freight relying on tarmac that is frequently neglected due to budget deficits and diverted funds. The World Bank estimates the annual cost of this neglect at $1.2 billion in lost productivity, with nearly a third of the $150 billion invested in roads by the late 1980s already lost. While some countries like South Africa and Kenya are exploring private sector concessions, tolls, and Chinese financing, challenges such as low traffic volumes in Malawi and the high cost of vehicle overloading persist.

The report analyzes the 2008 election cycles in various African countries, noting a general trend where incumbents face little threat from fragmented oppositions, though significant leadership transitions are occurring in Namibia, Mozambique, and Malawi. It details specific national contexts, such as the ANC's dominant position in South Africa, the adherence to term limits in Botswana and Malawi, and the competitive outlook in Mozambique following President Joaquim Chissano's retirement. Key voter concerns across the region include poverty, unemployment, HIV/AIDS, and land reform.

The text examines the state of democracy in Africa during a period of significant electoral activity, warning that elections can become a 'cloak of legitimacy' for power-seeking leaders. It asserts that the true goal of freedom struggles was universal suffrage, and that violating the right to vote betrays the public trust and undermines the contract between the governing and the governed.

The research paper analyzes the persistence of one-party dominance in Africa, noting that ruling parties leverage state resources, security forces, and 'struggle credentials' to maintain control. It contrasts this with opposition parties that are often fractious, resource-poor, and centered on individual ambition. While citing the 2002 Kenyan election as an example of incumbent vulnerability, the author argues that genuine pluralism requires stronger civic responsibility and organized, broad-based support from civil society.

The report identifies political instability, crumbling infrastructure, a severe credit crunch, and the absence of the rule of law as the primary barriers to African economic development. It argues that while large-scale projects are often prioritized, the immediate economic payoff lies in the regular maintenance of existing transport and utility services and the reform of legal systems to protect property rights and enforce contracts. The document highlights a critical funding gap, noting that while Africa requires $64 billion in investments to meet growth targets, donors provide only about $14 billion annually. Corruption is identified as a pervasive corrosive force, with 52% of surveyed business organisations stating that bribes are necessary to open a business.

The report identifies a disconnect between government priorities and the needs of the business sector in Africa, highlighting corruption and infrastructure failure as primary barriers to growth. Based on dialogues with 56 business organisations and five studies, it asserts that stability in Africa is dependent on prosperity, which requires improvements in property rights, the rule of law, and power reliability.

The paper argues that the current trend of African countries belonging to multiple regional entities simultaneously is unsustainable, particularly as these groups move from free trade areas to customs unions. Because a country cannot realistically apply two different common external tariffs, overlapping memberships create legal contradictions and increased transaction costs. The author proposes four potential scenarios for rationalisation: equal sharing of members, a merger of SACU and SADC, the dominance of COMESA, or the creation of a single large regional trading bloc aligned with the African Union's goal of an African Economic Community by 2025.

The author contends that malaria control in Africa is hindered by donor agencies and UN bodies that prioritize ineffective measures, such as insecticide-treated nets, over proven methods like Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS) using DDT. The text highlights the success of 'vertical' health programs in Southern African countries and criticizes the influence of the environmental movement and decentralized health systems on public health outcomes. It calls for a science-based approach that integrates IRS and Artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) to reduce malaria mortality and morbidity.

The document examines the precarious state of opposition politics in Africa, using the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) in Zimbabwe as a primary example of the 'lose-lose scenario' faced by opposition parties. It argues that while many African nations have nominally transitioned to democracy, ruling parties often undermine fair elections through biased laws, violence, and media bans. Additionally, the text highlights internal failures within opposition groups, such as frequent splintering and a lack of strategic maturity, which hinder their ability to challenge dominant party systems.

The author argues that political opposition in SADC countries is structurally marginalized due to the fusion of liberation parties with the state and economy. This creates an environment where the electorate remains unresponsive to government failure, and potential opposition talent is deterred by the risks of alienating ruling elites or the lure of government and corporate employment.