Search Climate Insights Directory

The document presents a series of case studies from Friends of the Earth (FoE) affiliates worldwide, highlighting grassroots efforts to combat deforestation, protect endangered species, promote organic food, and transition to renewable energy. It emphasizes the role of local communities—particularly indigenous peoples and women—in creating sustainable alternatives to corporate-led development. The report also outlines the organization's broader political agenda to challenge international financial institutions and multinational corporations, advocating for 'ecological debt' payments from the Global North to the Global South.

SGR argues that the UK government's approach to climate change is too cautious and fails to challenge the unsustainable nature of economic growth. The organization advocates for a 'Contraction and Convergence' model for global emissions, a shift in taxation from labour to resource use, and the complete replacement of fossil fuels and nuclear power with renewables. SGR specifically criticizes the government's reliance on 'accounting tricks' for non-CO2 gases, the lack of restrictions on air travel, and the potential dangers of climate engineering technologies.

The report finds that German supermarkets could reduce material use across their product ranges by approximately 20% by switching to more efficient products and innovative business models. Despite their market power, no major German supermarket currently has a policy to reduce the material resource use embedded in the products they sell. The document argues that an economy-wide 20% increase in resource efficiency would create nearly 700,000 jobs and lower gross output prices by 4.3% by 2030. It recommends that supermarkets stop selling inefficient products, demand resource data from suppliers, and that the German government implement binding absolute resource efficiency targets.

The report argues that German supermarkets, as dominant market gatekeepers, have a significant opportunity to reduce material consumption by approximately 20% through product innovation, reduced packaging, and new business models. It highlights a paradox where Germany is a leader in waste policy but remains one of Europe's largest waste producers per capita. The document calls for a shift from voluntary guidelines to binding national and EU-level resource efficiency targets to drive economic growth and job creation.

The paper examines the history and current state of EU environmental governance, detailing the roles of the Commission, Parliament, Council, and Court of Justice. It highlights a systemic failure in the enforcement of environmental law by Member States and the Commission, noting that economic interests frequently override environmental concerns. The author argues that the EU's 'good governance' principles of openness and participation are poorly implemented, leaving environmental NGOs with limited influence and citizens with minimal access to justice. While the EU has a comprehensive body of legislation, the author concludes that the lack of political will makes much of it a 'paper tiger'.

The document critiques the 'green economy' as a mechanism for financial institutions and multinationals to commodify nature. It argues that market-based solutions, such as carbon markets and biodiversity offsets, lead to 'green grabbing,' the marginalization of indigenous communities, and the evasion of corporate environmental responsibility. The report advocates for the recognition of ecological debt, the protection of common goods through community management, and a radical shift toward sustainable societies based on social and ecological justice rather than market logic.

The document argues that the current global economic system, driven by neoliberal ideology, has failed by causing environmental destruction and extreme inequality. It proposes five key pillars for transformation: ensuring universal public services through tax justice, scaling up social ownership and cooperatives, supporting local markets and fair trade, adopting wellbeing-based economic indicators instead of GDP, and establishing binding international rules to hold transnational corporations accountable for human rights and environmental abuses.

The document critiques neoliberalism for causing ecological destruction and deep inequalities, proposing a shift toward an economy that prioritizes people and the planet. It outlines five strategic pillars for transformation: ensuring universal public services through tax justice, expanding cooperatives and the social and solidarity economy, supporting local agroecological markets and fair trade, replacing GDP with wellbeing indicators (such as 'Buen vivir' or 'doughnut economics'), and establishing a binding UN treaty to hold multinational corporations accountable for human rights and environmental abuses.

The Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) is an international non-profit research organization that integrates scientific research with policy analysis to promote sustainability. Operating through eight global centers, SEI focuses on climate change, water, air, and land use, while incorporating perspectives on governance, economics, gender, and human health. Its regional centers provide specialized expertise in areas such as sustainable urbanization in Africa, climate adaptation in Asia, and environmental governance in the Baltic region and European Union.

The document examines the role of Swedish municipalities in promoting sustainable consumption, finding that while over 60% work systematically on the issue, they are hindered by limited financial resources, staff capacity, and a lack of clear national guidance. It highlights the potential of sustainable procurement and data-driven monitoring, while recommending stronger national coordination and long-term local action plans.

The document advocates for replacing the 'linear economy'—characterized by resource extraction and waste—with a 'circular economy' that emphasizes recycling, reuse, and remanufacturing. It outlines the environmental and economic benefits of circularity, including significant potential cost savings in manufacturing and reduced greenhouse gas emissions. The briefing also highlights corporate examples from Philips, H&M, and Trina Solar, and details several Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) projects focused on circular procurement, plastic waste management, and sustainable production-consumption systems.

The SEI strategy 2025–29 focuses on three impact areas: climate transitions, nature and resources, and health and wellbeing. It introduces 'accelerating implementation' as a new strategic outcome to move faster on global goals. The institute aims to pursue innovative research on emerging topics such as critical raw materials, the sustainability of AI, and the intersection of climate transitions and international security, while strengthening its global integration as 'One SEI'.

The report calculates the ecological footprint (EF) of the North West region of England, finding it to be 6.2 global hectares (gha) per capita. This level of consumption would require more than three planets if adopted globally. The study identifies food consumption, construction, and transport as the primary drivers of the region's environmental impact, with food being the largest single EF component. It proposes 'Factor Four' efficiency scenarios to reduce these impacts by 2020 and 2050.

The document defines a target for possessions based on low overall consumption and a preference for second-hand or reconditioned goods. It provides estimated carbon footprints for various consumer products and suggests minimum lifetimes to ensure consistency with a target emission level of 0.1 tCO2e per capita per year in the UK.

The guide outlines five strategies to extend the life of household food supplies: maintaining correct refrigerator and freezer temperatures, distinguishing between 'use by' and 'best before' labels, repurposing aging produce, using ingredient substitutes, and utilizing food scraps for stock or gardening.

The guide outlines strategies to minimize household food waste, including maintaining a refrigerator temperature of 4°C or lower and a freezer at -18°C to slow bacterial growth. It distinguishes between the best-before date (Mindesthaltbarkeitsdatum), which indicates quality, and the use-by date (Verbrauchsdatum), which is critical for safety in fresh products. Additionally, it suggests creative ways to use overripe produce, substitute ingredients, and repurpose vegetable scraps into stocks or new plants.

The document outlines how pet owners can reduce their 'carbon pawprint' and protect biodiversity. Key recommendations include avoiding the release of exotic pets into the wild to prevent invasive species, sourcing pets legally to combat illegal wildlife trade, and restricting outdoor roaming for cats to reduce predation. It also suggests sustainable consumption choices, such as avoiding fresh/frozen pet foods due to transportation emissions, choosing deforestation-free food brands, and opting for biodegradable waste bags and toys made from recycled or natural materials.

The guide outlines five ways to reduce the environmental footprint of consumption: reducing food waste, mindful consumption of high-impact foods, choosing certified sustainable products, engaging with local food producers, and advocating for conservation policies.

The document outlines ten ways to celebrate Halloween sustainably, focusing on waste reduction, the use of recycled materials, and local sourcing.

The document outlines the environmental and financial costs of food waste in the US, noting that nearly half of all waste occurs in homes. It provides actionable advice on food preservation, such as freezing and reinvigorating produce, and encourages users to challenge 'best before' labels and support legislative action in Congress.