Search Climate Insights Directory

A coalition of NGOs calls on France to oppose Japan's presence at the November 2020 Finance in Common Summit unless Japan ends its support for coal. The NGOs highlight that while France has committed to a coal exit, Japan continues to plan 11.9GW of domestic coal capacity and has supported 8.6GW of new coal plants internationally since the Paris agreements. Specifically, the statement identifies three overseas projects currently under consideration: Vung Ang 2 in Vietnam, Indramayu in Indonesia, and Matarbari Phase 2 in Bangladesh.

Iberdrola is a global power utility headquartered in Spain that aims for carbon neutrality in Europe by 2030 and globally by 2050. The company is aggressively expanding its renewable energy capacity, targeting 60 GW by 2025, and investing heavily in smart grids, electric mobility, and green hydrogen. It is a major issuer of green bonds and actively advocates for ambitious global climate policies through partnerships with the UN and the European Union.

The document argues that public funds alone cannot meet Africa's growing energy demands, which require an estimated $120 billion annually until 2040. It advocates for 'green financing'—blending public, development, and private capital—to reduce investment risks and improve affordability. Using Kenya as a model, the brief details how instruments like Partial Risk Guarantees, concessional loans, and Feed-in Tariffs have facilitated large-scale wind and geothermal projects. It specifically encourages the European Union to leverage its development finance institutions to create risk-mitigation products and support local private sector partnerships to accelerate the continent's green transition.

Reclaim Finance criticizes BlackRock, CalPERS, and CalSTRS for maintaining 'feeble' coal policies that allow continued investment in coal expansion. The statement highlights loopholes in exclusion thresholds and the failure to apply policies to passive investments or the coal power sector, urging these institutions to divest from coal developers.

The Climate Action Tracker finds that COVID-19 recovery packages in major emitting economies lack detailed green planning, with quantifiable interventions representing only a small fraction of total GDP investments. While the pandemic may lower emissions by 2030, this is attributed to economic downturn rather than structural decarbonisation, leaving global warming projections at 2.9°C based on current policies, far exceeding the Paris Agreement's 1.5°C limit.

The report finds that financial institutions managing at least USD 47 trillion in assets—approximately 25% of the global financial market—have committed to climate-related investment targets. It identifies three primary mechanisms for influencing emissions: divestment, positive impact investment, and corporate engagement. The analysis emphasizes that divestment alone may not reduce real-economy emissions if other investors purchase the carbon-intensive assets, and notes that most institutions with such targets are currently concentrated in Europe, the United States, and Australia.

An analysis of the European Investment Bank's (EIB) transport portfolio since 2015 reveals that approximately half of the investments are aligned with the Paris Agreement. To achieve full alignment and support European transport decarbonisation, the report recommends that the EIB develop a strategic project pipeline focusing on modal shift, rail electrification, shipping decarbonisation, and electric mobility infrastructure, while establishing a negative list of ineligible projects and increasing transparency regarding induced emissions.

The statement criticizes current financial institution commitments to the Paris Agreement as lacking concrete action and proposes two primary principles for alignment: adopting a commitment by COP26 that all supported projects and companies align with 1.5°C, and implementing processes to measure, disclose, and phase out financed emissions based on science-based targets.

The document outlines principles for financial institutions (FIs) to align with the 1.5°C goal of the Paris Agreement, specifically referencing the IPCC SR1.5 pathway 1. It demands the immediate cessation of financing for new fossil fuel exploration and infrastructure, a rapid phase-out of coal financing by 2030 in OECD countries and 2040 globally, and the prohibition of financing for projects causing deforestation or ecosystem degradation. FIs are urged to disclose their full carbon footprint, set science-based targets to reach zero impact by 2050, and avoid reliance on offsets or untested negative emissions technologies.

A joint letter from civil society organisations advocating for the inclusion of the shipping sector in the EU Emissions Trading System and the implementation of a -40% GHG efficiency target by 2030 to address rising maritime emissions.

The document analyzes the proliferation of 'climate neutrality' and 'net zero' targets among governments and corporations, noting that while some contribute positively to climate goals, others lack transparency and may obscure a lack of ambition. It emphasizes the need for clear information on coverage, target years, and the role of offsets to prevent the misrepresentation of climate action.

The report asserts that 'business as usual' is an unsustainable strategy for industrial sectors, as over 40 percent of annual greenhouse gas emissions originate from energy-intensive industries. It warns that failure to reach net-zero emissions by 2050 threatens the global economy with supply chain disruptions and value destruction for major commodities. The author argues that achieving a 1.5°C pathway requires not only technological shifts—such as the adoption of hydrogen and carbon capture—but also a reduction in the demand for materials like steel, cement, and plastic. The text emphasizes that an orderly transition is preferable to disruptive 'black swan' events and notes a shifting balance of market power away from fossil fuel industries toward climate-aligned corporations.

The report analyzes how the COVID-19 pandemic affects global emission pathways toward Paris Agreement goals, estimating a 2020 CO2 reduction of 4% to 8% depending on lockdown duration. It projects a potential 2030 emission reduction of 2.5 to 4.5 GtCO2e relative to pre-pandemic projections, though this could be offset by a rebound to fossil fuels. Additionally, it introduces a classification framework for recovery measures, finding that 31% of Germany's June 2020 stimulus package consists of 'green' measures.

The document proposes a framework for 'transition labels' to distinguish genuine low-carbon transition activities from 'greenwashing'. It establishes five core principles for transition pathways: alignment with a 1.5°C trajectory (net-zero by 2050, near-half emissions by 2030), science-based targets, exclusion of carbon offsets, prioritization of technical feasibility over economic competitiveness, and a requirement for concrete metrics over vague commitments. The framework categorizes economic activities into five types: near-zero emission, zero-carbon transition, non-transitionable, temporary transitional, and stranded. It further distinguishes between entity-level transitions (supported by equity, general bonds, and sustainability-linked loans/bonds) and activity-level transitions (supported by asset-backed securities and use-of-proceeds bonds).

The Climate Bonds Initiative presents a framework to categorise economic activities based on their role in a net-zero transition and establishes five principles to ensure transition labels are scientifically credible and ambitious. It distinguishes between 'green' and 'transition' labels based on the long-term viability of the activity in a low-carbon economy.

The Climate Bonds Initiative outlines a framework to distinguish credible 'transition' activities from greenwashing, establishing five core principles for alignment with the Paris Agreement. It introduces a labeling system—distinguishing between 'Environmental Labels' for long-term low-carbon roles and 'Transition Labels' for short-to-medium term emission reductions—and categorizes economic activities based on their necessity post-2050 and their decarbonization pathways.

The Climate Bonds Initiative proposes a framework for 'transition' labels to prevent greenwashing and ensure investments align with the Paris Agreement. The framework establishes five core principles for ambitious transitions: alignment with a 1.5 degree trajectory (net zero by 2050), science-based goals, the exclusion of offsets, the prioritization of technological viability over economic competitiveness, and a requirement for operating metrics over pledges. It categorizes economic activities into five types—Near Zero, Pathway to Zero, No Pathway to Zero, Interim, and Stranded—to determine whether a 'green' or 'transition' label is appropriate. The framework is designed to be flexible, applying to both whole entities (via equity or sustainability-linked bonds) and specific activities (via use-of-proceeds bonds).

The report analyzes 46 green bonds (USD 37bn) issued in H1 2020. It finds that green bonds generally outperformed vanilla equivalents in terms of book cover and spread compression, particularly in the EUR market. Despite a general market sell-off during the COVID-19 pandemic, green bonds maintained sufficient liquidity and showed resilience. Approximately 55% of allocations went to green or socially responsible investors. While the 'greenium' (pricing inside the yield curve) was less consistent than in H2 2019, 11 of 21 bonds with buildable yield curves priced on or inside their curves. The report also highlights the emergence of the communications sector, exemplified by Swisscom, and the growth of green bond ETFs.

The report finds that 11 of 18 EU coal-using countries lack Paris-compatible phase-out plans, with seven not planning to exit coal by 2030 and four replacing coal with increased fossil gas. It argues that the Just Transition Fund's current allocation methodology risks funding 'climate laggards,' as nearly two-thirds of the fund would go to countries without 2030 phase-out plans. The authors recommend making fund access conditional on ambitious coal phase-out dates and strictly excluding all fossil fuels, including gas, from the fund's scope.

The white paper argues that current fossil fuel data is fragmented and inaccessible, hindering the global effort to phase out production. It proposes a government-led, transparent registry to set a global baseline of reserves and resources, enabling strategic planning for a just transition. The proposal outlines minimum reporting requirements—including developed reserves, other reserves, and licensed resources—and suggests potential hosting arrangements such as the UNEP or UNFCCC Secretariat.