Search Climate Insights Directory

The Community Action Plan (CAP) for Hman Pin village and Hman Pin inn aims to balance biodiversity conservation with local development in the Upper Chindwin Basin of Myanmar. The plan identifies high-priority threats to the 4-acre wetland, including gold mining, logging, and overfishing driven by cultural festivals. To mitigate these pressures, the CAP proposes a three-pronged approach: habitat conservation through the demarcation of zones and local regulations; the promotion of sustainable livelihoods such as groundnut cultivation, pig farming, and fish farming; and a Communication, Education, Participation and Awareness (CEPA) programme. Implementation is led by a Village Working Committee (VWC) with support from the Stockholm Environment Institute and other partners, utilizing a monitoring framework to track water quality, biodiversity, and land-use changes.

The document identifies open-pit mining, climate change, deforestation, and agricultural expansion as the primary drivers of habitat loss and resource depletion in the Chindwin River Basin. It highlights five highly affected biodiversity areas, with Pauk Inn wetlands identified as the most vulnerable. Key institutional challenges include limited financial resources, data gaps, and a lack of public participation. The report recommends that the Chindwin River Basin Committee lead integrated water resources management and that the Sagaing regional government centralize conservation activities to improve coordination.

The document evaluates biofuel production in southern Africa, finding that sugarcane generally improves food security and reduces poverty, while jatropha's benefits are unproven or precarious. It highlights a trade-off where sugarcane can increase carbon stocks but displace food crops, whereas jatropha plantations in Mozambique caused substantial carbon stock losses. The brief also notes that high costs hinder the adoption of ethanol cooking stoves in urban Mozambique despite their potential to reduce charcoal-driven deforestation.

The UK Soy Manifesto is an industry-led commitment to eliminate deforestation and conversion from soy supply chains entering the UK. Signatories commit to a cut-off date of January 2020 for deforestation and conversion, with full implementation required by 2025. The framework emphasizes collective action across the supply chain—from traders to retailers—and requires annual public reporting on progress. It aligns with the French Soy Manifesto and the European National Soy Initiatives (ENSI) to create a unified market signal. The UK Government supports the initiative, linking it to the due diligence obligations being established through the Environment Bill. To ensure accountability, a monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) system is being developed by a working group including the Stockholm Environment Institute and WWF-UK.

The report outlines the assumptions used to model transportation emissions reductions by 2030, including fuel economy targets, the adoption of plug-in hybrids, and the deployment of cellulosic ethanol. It describes adjustments made to the AEO 2008 model to reflect more aggressive efficiency standards and the impacts of smart growth policies.

The document outlines conservative estimates for biomass energy supply in the US, focusing on energy crops, agricultural residues, forestry residues, and urban/mill residues. It details the use of the POLYSYS model to assess land-use changes, specifically for switchgrass, and provides the methodology for calculating land-use impacts for other renewable energy technologies and avoided coal mining.

The Union of Concerned Scientists advocates for a 'count carbs and make carbs count' approach to transportation fuels, emphasizing the need for life cycle emissions analysis to distinguish between high-carbon fuels like liquid coal and low-carbon alternatives like cellulosic ethanol. The report highlights that while some biofuels can significantly reduce emissions, others may increase them depending on feedstock and land use. It promotes the adoption of Low Carbon Fuel Standards, citing California's model, to drive the market toward sustainable, low-carbon fuels and avoid the high emissions associated with liquid coal and tar sands.

The document examines the environmental impact of palm oil production, specifically focusing on the release of carbon dioxide from the deforestation of tropical forests and the drainage of peatlands. It highlights Indonesia and Malaysia as the primary producers and discusses the resulting loss of biodiversity and increased greenhouse gas emissions. The text suggests that global demand can be met without further ecosystem destruction by improving yields, utilizing degraded lands, and implementing stronger government policies and corporate commitments.

The document asserts that corporate net-zero targets are fundamentally dependent on the continued function of natural carbon sinks, which are currently declining. It argues that value-chain decarbonization alone is insufficient because significant nature-related emissions occur in informal sectors and many companies lack science-based targets. To address a projected $4.1 trillion finance gap for nature, the briefing proposes that if 1,700 of the world's highest emitters compensated for 10% of their annual emissions through nature-based solutions, they could mobilize 30 Gt of climate solutions by 2030, representing over 10% of the remaining 1.5°C carbon budget.

The study finds that scaling up switchgrass production in the U.S. would likely displace existing crops and conservation land, potentially increasing commodity prices and reducing exports. While it may reduce erosion and nutrient pollution, increased nitrogen application could lead to higher nitrous oxide emissions, potentially offsetting soil carbon sequestration benefits and increasing overall greenhouse gas emissions from the agricultural sector.

The report argues that Brazil must expand its climate mitigation efforts beyond forestry to include the energy sector, as emissions from energy and land use change are now roughly equal. It identifies the transport, industry, and power-generation sectors as the primary areas for abatement, specifically suggesting the expansion of wind and solar energy and the electrification and hybridization of the transport fleet.

The research finds that first-generation biofuels in the US Midwest result in a disproportionate use of land and resources, with 30–40% of U.S. corn producing only 6% of national transportation energy. The document argues that these fuels drive land use change, increase global greenhouse gas emissions, and cause water degradation, while economic benefits remain concentrated among a small group of stakeholders. It warns that expanding these fuels for aviation could intensify these burdens and undermine long-term climate resilience and equity in Midwestern agriculture.

The document presents a methodology developed by the World Resources Institute and partners to standardize corporate GHG accounting for deforestation and land occupation. It addresses the inconsistency in current corporate reporting caused by the flexibility of existing frameworks like the GHG Protocol's Land Sector and Removals Guidance (LSRG). By using open, globally consistent spatial datasets, the methodology provides a common reference for emission factors across various crops and jurisdictions to improve transparency and comparability in scope 1 and scope 3 inventories.

The analysis finds that while major grassland goods and services are currently in good to fair condition, the overall capacity of these ecosystems to sustain them is declining due to cultivation, urbanization, and degradation.

The document assesses the application of the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard to the agricultural sector, identifying that while mechanical emissions are easy to track, non-mechanical sources like soils and livestock present significant accounting challenges due to variability and long timescales.

The document assesses the capacity of U.S. forests and farms to remove carbon dioxide, estimating the potential at hundreds of millions of metric tons per year. It highlights that while marginal costs are generally below US$50/tCO2, scaling requires overcoming challenges in measurement, monitoring, land-use competition, and funding. The paper distinguishes between practices that may reduce food and fiber supply and those that do not, such as reforestation on nonagricultural lands and improved forest carbon management.

The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Board identifies ten critical conclusions regarding the human impact on nature. It argues that while humans have altered ecosystems to meet demands for food, water, and energy, these changes have weakened essential services like air and water purification and disaster protection. The document highlights the vulnerability of 2 billion people in dry regions, the threat of species extinction, and the role of ecosystem loss as a barrier to achieving Millennium Development Goals. It concludes that reducing human impact requires changing the perception of ecosystem services as free and limitless, alongside coordinated policy efforts across governments and businesses.

The analysis concludes that biomass is a limited resource that should play a minor role in energy production, with priority given to carbon removal, chemicals production, and next-generation fuels over crop-based biofuels. It warns that demand for biomass could exceed sustainable supply, potentially leading to land use changes that increase greenhouse gas emissions, and recommends accelerating electrification and energy efficiency to reduce biomass demand.

The World Resources Institute and partners have developed a standardized geospatial dataset to operationalize the GHG Protocol’s Land Sector and Removals Guidance for corporate reporting. The dataset provides emission factors for 42 major crops across global, national, provincial, and municipal levels for the years 2020–24, covering carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide. Findings indicate significant variation in emissions by crop and region, with subnational data revealing 'hotspots' that national averages obscure.

The document updates global greenhouse gas emission data for 2005, noting that the share of emissions from land-use change decreased to 12.2% from 18.2% due to revised deforestation calculation methodologies, although absolute emissions from this sector actually increased between 2000 and 2005.