Search Climate Insights Directory

The IAI Directorate reports progress on the CRN II and SGP-HD programs, highlighting the leveraging of US$ 5.5 million in funding and the production of 108 peer-reviewed publications. Key achievements include the establishment of a phenology monitoring network in Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico, and the delivery of training institutes on climate adaptation and remote sensing. The report also details the 'Assessment of research and institutional needs to cope with the effects of Climate Change on Andean Biodiversity' project and various international collaborations to integrate climate science into policy.

The report evaluates the IAI's progress since 1994, noting its success in building scientific capacity and producing high-quality natural science. While the existing Science Agenda remains valid, the report argues for a strategic shift toward improving the translation of research into actionable guidance for decision-makers. It emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary collaboration—integrating social, economic, and health sciences with natural sciences—and suggests expanding the involvement of senior policy makers and industry leaders in the research process to enhance the societal relevance of global change science.

The report examines the critical role of forests in regulating the global climate through carbon, water, and nitrogen cycles. It argues that while forests currently act as carbon sinks, rising temperatures—particularly above 23C—risk turning them into carbon sources. The text emphasizes the superior carbon storage of old-growth forests over plantations and highlights the extreme vulnerability of peatlands and tropical forests. It concludes that protecting existing forests and their soils is a more effective climate strategy than relying on reforestation or the uncertain phenomenon of 'carbon fertilization'.

The IAI Directorate reports progress on the CRN II and SGP-HD programs, highlighting the development of a Latin American phenology network and increased stakeholder engagement in climate change planning. The report details significant academic achievements, including Nobel Peace Prize recognition for IPCC authors, and outlines capacity-building efforts through training institutes and regional workshops in the Andes and La Plata Basin. It also notes the establishment of new country contacts and institutional partnerships to strengthen climate research and policy integration across the Americas.

The report analyzes China's biofuels sector, focusing on the transition from grain-based ethanol to non-grain feedstocks grown on marginal land. It finds that government subsidies, including direct payments and tax exemptions, are essential for the industry's viability but may undermine food security, increase food prices, and cause environmental degradation. The authors conclude that biofuels have a negligible impact on China's energy security and recommend eliminating direct production subsidies.

This executive summary by Friends of the Earth challenges the Malaysian Palm Oil Council's (MPOC) claims that Malaysian palm oil is sustainable. It argues that expansion, particularly in Sarawak, is driving tropical deforestation, the destruction of peat lands, and human rights violations against indigenous peoples like the Penan. The report highlights the role of European and American bio-energy targets in driving this demand and calls for the EU to abandon its 10% biofuel target and for the Malaysian government to recognize Native Customary Rights and enforce a zero-burning policy.

The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) warns that using food crops like corn and soybeans for biofuels increases food prices, degrades ecosystems, and can raise global warming pollution through land conversion. The UCS advocates for a shift toward 'better' biofuels derived from waste or non-food biomass, supported by a low-carbon fuel standard and performance-based public funding. While the 2007 Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) provides a foundation by requiring pollution reductions from new facilities, the UCS argues for broader sustainability criteria to prevent deforestation and protect biodiversity.

The 2007 Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) aims to reduce global warming pollution from U.S. transportation fuels by mandating renewable fuel use and requiring life-cycle carbon reductions for new facilities. While it targets a reduction of 6 percent in pollution from cars and light trucks by 2022, the Union of Concerned Scientists warns that a loophole exempting most corn ethanol and the lack of regulation for other fossil fuels could negate these benefits. The document advocates for a low-carbon fuel standard to regulate the entire fuel market.

The report finds that Malaysia's ambitions to become a global biodiesel producer have been undermined by volatile feedstock prices and the high cost of production relative to petroleum diesel. While the government provided limited support through soft loans and tax incentives, a proposed B5 blending mandate would likely increase the national subsidy burden. The industry's profitability is precarious, relying heavily on exports to the EU and US, where it may benefit from subsidy loopholes. Environmentally, the report argues that the presumed carbon benefits of biodiesel are offset by greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and peatland conversion, while socially, global biofuel demand has contributed to rising food prices.

The report criticizes the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) for promoting a 'flawed model' of large-scale, export-oriented agrofuels in Latin America and the Caribbean. It argues that these projects, driven by demand from the US and Europe, lead to deforestation, biodiversity loss, and human rights abuses, such as violent land grabs in Colombia. The document asserts that agrofuels are not a viable climate solution due to land-use emissions and calls for the IDB to shift funding toward small-scale, local energy projects and truly clean renewables like wind and solar.

The document examines the limitations of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007's definition of 'renewable biomass,' which excludes many merchantable trees from private, naturally-regenerated forests. It argues that including these feedstocks would increase the availability of cellulosic fuels, avoid indirect greenhouse gas emissions associated with agricultural land-use change, and provide a tool for forest stewardship, including hazardous fuels reduction and wildlife habitat restoration. The author contends that the current RFS exclusions are arbitrary and should be replaced by ecologically meaningful sustainability criteria.

The document critiques the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) for promoting large-scale biofuel monocultures as a 'clean energy' solution. It argues that these projects, particularly in Brazil and Colombia, lead to deforestation, biodiversity loss, and rural displacement while failing to provide significant greenhouse gas reductions. The report calls for a shift toward small-scale, decentralized energy systems that support local food security and rural development.

The IAI is requesting a core budget of US$1,163,462 for FY 2008/2009, a 14.6% increase over the previous year, primarily driven by the devaluation of the US dollar against the Brazilian real and increased operational costs. The budget supports the management of the CRN II and SGP-HD programs, capacity building through training institutes, and strategic planning to strengthen links between science and policy. Key initiatives include a project on the hydroclimate of the La Plata Basin and a MacArthur Foundation-funded study on Andean biodiversity. Funding is sourced from member country contributions, with the United States providing the largest share.

The report evaluates the proposed EU Directive's 10% biofuels target for 2020, arguing that sustainability depends on precise GHG accounting and the use of productive feedstocks. It highlights that tropical regions, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America, have a significant comparative advantage in biofuel productivity over temperate regions. The authors caution against rigid land-use definitions that could disadvantage Least Developed Countries and emphasize the need to account for indirect land use change (iLUC) to avoid 'carbon debt'. The document recommends harmonizing EU methodology with IPCC guidelines and exploring the use of degraded lands for bioenergy to minimize food-security conflicts.

Friends of the Earth International rejects the Roundtable on Responsible Soy (RTRS), claiming it provides a "façade of sustainability" for agribusinesses and energy companies while failing to address the systemic impacts of industrial soy. The document highlights how soy expansion leads to deforestation, biodiversity loss, human rights violations, and increased food insecurity. It specifically criticizes the promotion of genetically modified (GM) soy, noting substantial increases in herbicide use in Brazil and the United States. The statement argues that the RTRS ignores indirect regional and global impacts, such as the displacement of agriculture into primary forests and the pollution caused by intensive livestock production in Europe. To address these issues, the organization calls for structural land reforms, reduced global demand for meat and dairy, and an end to large-scale agrofuel production.

The International Federation of Friends of the Earth rejects the Round Table on Responsible Soy (RTRS), claiming it provides a facade of sustainability for multinational corporations while ignoring the systemic impacts of industrial soy monocultures. The document details how soy expansion leads to biodiversity loss, climate change, human rights violations, and food insecurity. It specifically criticizes the promotion of genetically modified (GM) soy, noting significant increases in pesticide use in Brazil and the US. The text argues that demand is driven by intensive livestock farming and biofuels, and calls for structural land reforms, reduced meat consumption, and a shift toward organic and local agriculture.

The report 'Losing Ground' documents the systemic human rights violations associated with the expansion of oil palm plantations in Indonesia. It details how the conversion of customary lands into industrial monocultures leads to land dispossession, violent conflict, and the erosion of indigenous cultures. The authors highlight the economic failure of many smallholder schemes, which often result in debt bondage rather than prosperity, and describe severe environmental degradation, including water pollution and the loss of biodiversity. The document calls for the adoption of the principle of Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) and urges European governments to abandon biofuel targets that drive this unsustainable expansion.

The document identifies the organic agriculture sector in Lao PDR as inherently environmentally friendly but underdeveloped due to non-tariff barriers like certification. While it offers benefits such as enhanced soil fertility, significant growth could lead to negative impacts including deforestation and increased carbon emissions from transport. The author recommends that the government implement formal certification processes and draft regulations for food safety and land-use management to support the sector's expansion into international markets.

The testimony argues that broad biofuel mandates, such as those implemented by the European Union, can inadvertently accelerate global warming by driving deforestation and land-use changes to meet feedstock demand. The author warns that using farmland for energy crops displaces food production, leading to the conversion of carbon sinks like forests and wetlands. To avoid these outcomes, the Clean Air Task Force recommends that Massachusetts slow the rush toward broad mandates, develop comprehensive life-cycle analysis tools that account for indirect land-use effects, and prioritize 'niche' feedstocks that do not require substantial farmland, specifically algae, biomass waste, and other waste products.

The document examines the critical role of ecosystem services in buffering human populations against environmental disturbances and the risks posed by their decline. It highlights how the combination of climate change, biodiversity loss, and land-use change creates 'vulnerability complexes' that disproportionately affect poor and marginalised groups. The brief warns of 'tipping points' that could lead to catastrophic ecological shifts and massive population displacement, estimating that between 24 million and 700 million people could be environmentally displaced in coming decades. It calls for international climate policy to move beyond mitigation to include the monitoring of ecosystem health and the building of resilience to prevent humanitarian crises.