Search Climate Insights Directory

The statement by CIEL President Carroll Muffett emphasizes that the IPCC's Fifth Assessment Report confirms human influence on the climate system with greater than 95% certainty, primarily due to the burning of fossil fuels. It warns that continued inaction and a 'business as usual' approach will lead to unprecedented climate catastrophes and expose CEOs, shareholders, and investors to increased financial, regulatory, and legal risks.

The report details how the Israeli occupation in the West Bank utilizes environmental degradation, resource expropriation, and restrictive land-use designations as tools for colonization. It highlights the systemic theft of water resources, the dumping of industrial and nuclear waste on Palestinian lands, and the use of 'nature reserves' to justify the displacement of Palestinians and the destruction of their agricultural assets. The document concludes that these environmental crimes are inseparable from the political struggle for Palestinian self-determination.

The report details how Japanese trading companies import timber from Sarawak, Malaysia, where illegal logging and corruption are widespread. It highlights specific cases involving companies like Samling and Rimbunan-Sons, noting that only 5% of Sarawak's primary forest remains. The document criticizes the Japanese government's limited measures compared to the US, EU, and Australia, and urges Japan to mandate supply chain due diligence and ban illegal timber imports to protect global biodiversity and climate stability.

The text highlights the ecological and social costs of coal mining in Central India, specifically the loss of biodiversity and displacement of forest communities. It notes that despite doubling coal production capacity since 2007, 400 million Indians still lack electricity. The document criticizes the failure of 22 out of 29 Indian states to meet Renewable Purchase Obligation (RPO) targets in 2012 and argues that the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) acts as a fossil fuel subsidy by providing credits to coal plants that do not achieve real emission reductions.

The author contends that current forms of solidarity, such as charitable aid to migrants and the poor, are insufficient and should be replaced by political action. Specifically, the text calls for the amendment of the Dublin II treaty to relieve Greece of a disproportionate burden regarding asylum seekers and urges Northern European citizens to pressure their governments to oppose austerity measures imposed by the Troika. Finally, it argues that Europe must take responsibility for the exploitation of wealth, child labor, and wars in Asia and Africa to eliminate the root causes of migration.

The author reports on the Gezi Park protests in Istanbul, which began as a movement to save the city's only central green area from being replaced by a shopping mall designed as Ottoman army barracks. The protests evolved into a national movement against the abuse of power and human rights violations, characterized by non-violent demonstrations and creative community support. The author details the government's response, including police violence using tear gas and water cannons, the arrest of medical professionals and lawyers, and the suppression of independent media. The text also highlights broader environmental concerns, such as the Bosphorus bridge project and the destruction of a hilltop park for a mosque, while criticizing the United States for its unconditional support of Prime Minister Erdogan.

The author describes the devastating impact of austerity measures imposed on Portugal via a Memorandum of Understanding, noting that these policies have led to record unemployment, mass emigration, and increased poverty. The text highlights the failure of the 'Troika's' economic forecasts and calls for the Portuguese state to lead a debt renegotiation, similar to the 1953 London Agreement, to prioritize human rights and the welfare state over financial market interests.

The document discusses the ongoing negotiations in Bonn regarding the FVA and NMM, highlighting the need for standards that ensure real, permanent, and verified mitigation outcomes while avoiding double counting. Carbon Market Watch proposes specific governance and accounting measures to secure net atmospheric benefits and uphold human rights.

Carbon Market Watch argues that existing carbon markets have collapsed due to oversupply and poor quality, specifically citing the CDM and JI. The briefing recommends strengthening additionality criteria, shortening crediting periods, and establishing mandatory human rights and sustainability safeguards. For new mechanisms like the FVA and NMM, it advocates for a binding international governance structure and a common transaction tracking mechanism to prevent double counting of emission reductions.

The report evaluates the 'Doha Gateway' decisions from a human rights perspective, noting that while human rights are not explicitly mentioned in the Doha outcomes, they are referenced via the Cancun Agreements. The analysis covers mitigation ambition, loss and damage mechanisms, REDD+ safeguards, the Clean Development Mechanism's lack of appeals processes, public participation under Article 6, and the adoption of 'gender balance' over 'gender equality'.

Wilmar International, a major global palm oil producer, is accused of systemic environmental and human rights violations despite its stated CSR strategy. The document details specific land-grabbing and deforestation cases in Indonesia, Nigeria, and Uganda, and lists the major banks and pension funds providing financial support. It highlights the gap between the ESG policies of these financiers and the reported actions of Wilmar, noting that the Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global divested from the company in 2012 due to sustainability concerns.

The document details the activities of Vietnamese rubber companies HAGL and VRG in Cambodia and Laos, alleging systemic land grabbing, illegal deforestation, and human rights abuses. It highlights the role of international financiers, including Deutsche Bank and the IFC, in supporting these operations and calls for urgent government and financial interventions to stop illegal concessions and hold the companies accountable.

The document provides a detailed critique and set of recommendations for the World Bank's Environmental and Social Safeguard Policies. It argues that the Bank has failed to incorporate current international standards and suffers from inadequate monitoring, noting that between 1999 and 2008, more than one-third of projects were inadequately monitored. The authors advocate for the adoption of Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) as a cross-cutting requirement for all safeguards, the recognition of Indigenous Peoples’ and Community Conserved Territories and Areas (ICCAs) as legitimate conservation measures, and the integration of human rights due diligence into the Bank's operational framework.

This report identifies effective strategies used by faith-based organizations across Africa to combat HIV stigma. It categorizes interventions into knowledge sharing, upliftment, and advocacy, while emphasizing the critical role of faith leaders as community change agents. Through eight case studies, the document highlights that sustainable stigma reduction requires long-term commitment, the inclusion of people living with HIV in leadership, and the use of personal testimonies over purely theoretical training.

The document argues that the New Market Mechanism (NMM) and the Framework for Various Approaches (FVA) require a binding international governance structure to prevent double counting and ensure net atmospheric benefits. It identifies three types of double counting—unit type, double claiming, and overlapping mitigation/financial contributions—and calls for a common international transaction tracking mechanism. The author emphasizes that credits must be tied to the upholding of international human rights law and sustainable development indicators to avoid the failures observed under the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM).

Carbon Market Watch argues that the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) is facing a market collapse due to low demand and an over-supply of non-additional carbon credits. The organization urges a fundamental reform of additionality requirements, the shortening of crediting periods, and the establishment of human rights standards and grievance mechanisms. It further recommends strengthening civil society participation, addressing conflicts of interest among Designated Operational Entities (DOEs), and improving the governance and codes of conduct of the CDM Executive Board.

Carbon Market Watch outlines critical reforms needed for the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) review at COP-19. The author warns that failure to address quality issues, particularly regarding additionality, could lead to an over-supply of more than 4 gigatonnes of CO2 offsets and drive prices below 1 EURO. Key recommendations include transitioning away from large-scale power supply projects, moving beyond pure offsetting to avoid double counting, shortening crediting periods to match technology lifespans, and establishing human rights standards. The document also calls for improved sustainable development monitoring, strengthened civil society participation through a CDM Ombudsman, and a restructuring of auditor payment to eliminate conflicts of interest.

The submission emphasizes that climate change is a major human rights challenge and urges that the 2015 Agreement's Preamble and Shared Vision explicitly recognize the link between human rights and climate change. It calls for a rights-based approach to adaptation, the regulation of corporations to prevent rights abuses during mitigation, and the establishment of an international mechanism to provide compensation for loss and damage. Additionally, it advocates for strong safeguard policies and accountability mechanisms within climate finance, specifically mentioning the Green Climate Fund, and demands guaranteed access to information and justice for all affected communities.

The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) criticizes the COP18 talks in Doha for a lack of political will and failed ambition, specifically noting that the 'Doha Climate Gateway' decisions did not include meaningful steps to protect human rights. While the UNFCCC had recognized in 2010 that climate change is a human rights issue affecting millions through sea-level rise, floods, and displacement, CIEL asserts that these considerations were sidelined in formal negotiations. Consequently, CIEL intends to support grassroots movements by developing legal strategies and tools to protect and compensate those whose lives and livelihoods are threatened by climate change.

The document highlights that both climate change impacts and the implementation of mitigation and adaptation policies can infringe upon the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities. It notes that the international climate change regime has largely failed to address these implications, only recognizing the importance of respecting human rights in the Framework Convention in 2010. The authors suggest that the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action (ADP) provides an opportunity to implement four concrete options to guarantee substantive and procedural rights and establish a redress mechanism for loss and damages.