Search Climate Insights Directory

The document proposes a series of reforms to the U.S. energy permitting process, including the designation of at least 25 high-priority projects across various energy types, the imposition of strict timelines for NEPA and Clean Water Act reviews, and measures to reduce litigation delays. It specifically suggests enhancing FERC's authority over interstate electric transmission and hydrogen facilities, and mandates the completion of the Mountain Valley Pipeline.

The document is a social media toolkit designed to help advocates communicate the risks associated with the "Big Ugly Bill." It provides platform-specific posting tips and detailed talking points regarding the repeal of electric vehicle tax credits, cuts to clean energy and nutrition programs, increased spending on a proposed anti-missile system, and attacks on scientific integrity.

The document argues that the costs of failing to reduce carbon emissions in the United States are prohibitive, citing projected damages to coastal infrastructure, public health, water resources, agriculture, transportation, and energy systems. It highlights that under high-emissions scenarios, the annual economic impact could reach 1.9 percent of GDP by 2100. Specific regional risks include severe sea-level rise in Florida and the Northeast, extreme heat waves in Midwestern cities, water scarcity in the Southwest, and increased wildfire frequency in the West Coast and Rocky Mountain regions. The document advocates for a reduction of carbon emissions by at least 80 percent from 2005 levels by 2050 to avoid the worst consequences.

The document introduces a data set providing 14 city-relevant climate hazard indicators for 996 large cities, based on NEX-GDDP-CMIP6 downscaled climate simulations. It compares a 1994-2014 historical baseline against three warming scenarios (1.5°C, 2.0°C, and 3.0°C) to assist city decision-makers in strategic planning and risk management. Key findings indicate that at 3.0°C of warming, cities will experience heatwaves that are 28% longer and 25% more frequent on average than at 1.5°C, alongside increased energy demand for cooling and higher transmission risks for arboviruses.

The document argues that a global transformation of energy infrastructure is necessary to avoid climate disaster and that both developed and emerging economies can benefit from the growing market for utility-scale, low-carbon power technologies. It proposes an 'innovation ecosystem' approach to address the complexity of innovation processes, emphasizing that improvements in price and performance across a technology's lifecycle—from design to maintenance—are essential to closing the gap between current and required technology performance. The paper offers a step-by-step process for policymakers to build the innovation capacity needed to compete in the global value chain.

The document discusses the role of carbon capture and storage (CCS) as a potential bridging technology to allow the continued use of coal while reducing CO2 emissions. It argues that while CCS is viewed as a way to maintain the energy status quo, deploying it at a national scale would require a transformation of energy infrastructure as fundamental as a large-scale shift to wind energy.

The testimony by Jennifer Morgan of the World Resources Institute emphasizes the necessity of integrating climate change risks into energy resource development and infrastructure planning. It urges Congress to review federal agency authorities regarding climate risk, support impact assessments for energy infrastructure, and implement comprehensive, long-term policies to drive clean energy competitiveness. Specific recommendations for energy efficiency include improving product labeling for informed consumer choice and updating efficiency standards for vehicles and appliances. The document calls for bipartisan agreement on policies that diversify domestic energy production and maximize the deployment of low-carbon technologies through funding and incentives.

The paper examines how 29 Clean Cities and Communities (CC&C) coalitions, overseen by the US Department of Energy, facilitate the adoption of electric school buses (ESBs) in the US. While coalitions generally support ESBs for health and environmental reasons, their effectiveness is limited by capacity constraints, infrastructure gaps, and political tensions regarding alternative fuels like propane and compressed natural gas.

The EV Grid Simulator is a tool developed by the World Resources Institute and the UPS Foundation to help stakeholders like city planners and utility operators analyze how EV charging affects distribution transformers and substations. By inputting data on EV characteristics, charging infrastructure, and grid capacity, users can estimate unmanaged energy demand, identify grid vulnerabilities, and calculate optimized charging curves to defer infrastructure upgrades. The tool also explores vehicle-grid integration (VGI) potential for grid services and helps determine optimal charging locations based on grid resilience and parking habits. However, the model is limited by the accuracy of user inputs, does not provide financial cost-benefit analyses, and cannot accommodate vehicles that charge more than once per day.