Search Climate Insights Directory

The Canadian Climate Institute asserts that Canada's industrial carbon pricing is currently a "hodgepodge of rules" that fails to drive significant investment in low-carbon projects. While the federal government is reviewing its minimum national standards (the federal benchmark), the Institute finds the current proposal insufficient to deliver intended emissions outcomes. To fix this, the Institute recommends ensuring a minimum effective carbon credit price of $130 per tonne by 2030, implementing non-negotiable conditions such as increasing emissions performance standards and price floors/ceilings, and mandating transparent, credible data disclosure on emitter compliance and actual prices paid.

The Canadian Climate Institute asserts that Canada's industrial carbon pricing framework is currently ineffective due to inconsistent rules and market failures. It criticizes the federal government's proposed updates to the national minimum standards (federal benchmark) as inadequate, warning that they could allow non-performing provincial systems to be deemed compliant. The Institute proposes three primary corrections: ensuring a real minimum carbon price of $130 per tonne by 2030, imposing non-negotiable conditions on provincial flexibility—such as strengthening emission performance standards and limiting compliance options—and requiring transparent, credible data on emitter compliance and actual prices paid to monitor performance.

Carbon Market Watch asserts that private jet use in Europe is under-regulated despite being the most polluting form of travel. The organization proposes multiplying the carbon price by four for private jets and expanding the scope of the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) to cover the 67% of private jet emissions currently exempt. Such measures could raise between €304 million and €2.2 billion annually by 2030, depending on the scope of coverage and the inclusion of non-CO2 effects. The document also advocates for aviation fuel taxation and the prioritization of low-cost solutions, such as contrail avoidance, over subsidies for unsustainable bio-kerosene.

A joint statement by industrial, research, and civil society organisations urging the European Commission to broaden the scope and ambition of the proposed Industrial Accelerator Act to better stimulate demand for low-carbon industrial products in Europe.

The policy brief emphasizes that because action on agricultural methane occurs on the farm, countries must design context-specific policies that support farmers' economic interests while reducing emissions. It highlights a gap in national climate strategies, noting that while many Global Methane Pledge signatories include agricultural methane in their NDCs, very few have quantifiable targets. The document advocates for a mix of economic incentives and technical support, citing Brazil's Programa Mais Leite Saudável as a model for using tax credits to drive industry-wide practice shifts. It concludes by calling for philanthropic investment in applied research and the 'Plan to Accelerate' initiative to provide the evidence base and strategic information needed to scale these interventions.

The report argues that proactive investment in adapting Canada's public infrastructure to climate risks can save governments billions in annual costs while protecting the economy from cascading disruptions.

The report highlights a conflict between the strategic autonomy of the European Union and the financing activities of major European banks, which continue to support US LNG export terminals. It notes that the EU imported 57% of its LNG from the US in 2025, a figure that could rise to 80% by 2030. The document identifies specific banks—including ING, Crédit Agricole, Santander, BPCE (via Natixis), and Société Générale—as key financiers of US developers like Venture Global and Freeport LNG. It warns that this dependence, compounded by a July 2025 trade agreement requiring the EU to purchase US$750 billion of US energy by 2028, exposes Europe to price volatility, geopolitical leverage by the US administration, and the risk of stranded assets.

The report claims that the EU's shift from Russian gas to US LNG has created a new strategic dependency, exacerbated by financing from major European banks like ING and Crédit Agricole. It highlights a July 2025 trade agreement requiring the EU to purchase $750 billion in US energy by 2028 as evidence of US geopolitical leverage. The author warns that this dependency leads to price volatility, risks stranded assets due to LNG overcapacity, and threatens EU climate targets.

The Indonesian Environmental Fund (IEF) is requesting a grant of USD 886,719 from the Green Climate Fund (GCF) to prepare a full funding proposal for the Green Peatland Economy (GPE) project. The GPE project aims to transition Indonesia's peatlands from drainage-based, high-emission land use to zero-drainage, low-emission models that enhance community resilience and preserve ecosystems. The PPF will fund nine key activities over 13 months, including feasibility studies, gender and social inclusion analyses, market assessments for 'peatland-friendly' commodities, and the development of sustainable financial instruments. The project focuses on five Peatland Hydrological Units (PHUs) across Riau, Central Kalimantan, and South Sumatra provinces.

The document critiques the Indonesian government's strategy of nationalizing companies that violated environmental laws, arguing that state-led initiatives like the Food and Energy Estates are causing massive deforestation in Papua. It warns that these projects risk repeating the failures of the 1990s Mega Rice project and may deter foreign investment due to perceived legal instability and corruption. The author suggests that the government should instead leverage its power to force companies to fund ecosystem restoration and shift agricultural expansion to degraded lands rather than intact forests.

Reclaim Finance argues that the Fonds de réserve pour les retraites (FRR) continues to use public money to support fossil fuel expansion despite updating its exclusion policy. The FRR's new measures only target unconventional hydrocarbons and thermal coal, leaving conventional oil and gas investments intact. The document also highlights the FRR's failure to implement science-based criteria for selecting asset managers, noting that it continues to work with firms like BlackRock despite their climate records.

The document evaluates the feasibility of fuel cell electric trucks (FCETs) and hydrogen internal combustion engine (ICE) trucks in India. It finds that while FCETs could be more cost-competitive than diesel trucks in long-haul, heavy-duty applications by 2040, they currently struggle to reach cost parity with battery electric trucks (BETs) due to high hydrogen fuel costs. These costs are driven by production, refueling infrastructure, and an 18% GST. The brief argues that hydrogen trucks are a critical complement to BETs for use cases requiring high payload and minimal downtime. It recommends a coordinated pathway involving capital subsidies, tax rationalization (reducing GST to 5%), and the development of public hydrogen refueling stations (HRS) to unlock the market.

The GAIA Technical Assistance Facility (GAIA TAF) is a blended finance initiative aimed at overcoming the 'weak investment pipelines' in SIDS and LDCs. By providing sub-grants for technical assistance, the facility helps public institutions improve their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards and commercial bankability. The program targets up to 6 institutions and aims to unlock up to USD 27 million in follow-on investments from the GAIA Climate Loan Fund across sectors including water, agriculture, ecosystems, built environment, energy, and transportation.

The report examines how the UAE and Saudi Arabia are emerging as primary financiers of clean energy in Africa, noting a shift toward multi-billion dollar renewable and hydrogen projects. While GCC investments are substantial, they are currently concentrated in a few low-risk markets like Egypt, Morocco, and South Africa. The authors argue that to maximize impact, the GCC should pivot toward funding transmission infrastructure, geothermal energy, methane abatement, and critical mineral refining across a broader range of African nations.

The document argues that while governments and civil society commit to Indigenous rights, these are not always reflected in practice. It advocates for a collaborative approach based on reciprocity, transparency, and the recognition of Indigenous science to address climate change and biodiversity loss.

Following a structural shift in 2025 where federal programs providing flexible capital for clean energy projects receded, RMI convened 70 practitioners to identify how to make community projects fit the "credit box" of mainstream capital. The report argues that projects often fail to secure financing due to three primary gaps: affordability (economic viability for low-income users), risk perception (investor discomfort with unfamiliar risks), and market access (assets being too small or fragmented for secondary markets). To resolve these, the report proposes four priorities for 2026: fixing the affordability gap through tools like on-bill mechanisms and interest rate buydowns; addressing risk perception via standardized credit enhancements; closing the market access gap through asset aggregation and warehousing; and resolving ecosystem capacity constraints by investing in subnational financing systems to improve coordination and capital translation.

Colombia's 2025 NDC shifts to an absolute emissions limit for 2035, targeting between 155 and 161 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent. The plan emphasizes 'Peace with Nature' to reduce deforestation, a just transition away from fossil fuels including a roadmap by 2029, and urban decarbonization through electric mobility and black carbon reduction. However, the transition faces challenges from economic dependence on oil and coal exports and upcoming 2026 elections.

The report argues that the AI industry uses a 'bait-and-switch' greenwashing tactic, where the proven climate benefits of 'traditional' AI (such as predictive models) are used to justify the massive energy and water consumption of 'consumer generative AI' (such as ChatGPT). An analysis of 154 climate benefit claims found that 97% related to traditional AI, while only 3% related to consumer generative AI, with no evidence found that the latter leads to substantial emissions reductions. Furthermore, the report finds that evidence for these benefits is generally weak, with 36% of claims citing no evidence and only 26% citing published academic research. This narrative masks the immediate climate impacts of data centre expansion, which the report states is boosting demand for fossil fuels and risking the ability of regions like Ireland and Australia to meet carbon targets.

The document outlines the complex regulatory and permitting landscape for transmission in Colorado, contrasting the processes for public utilities and independent developers. It highlights the role of the Colorado Electric Transmission Authority (CETA) in addressing transmission gaps identified in a 2024 study, specifically through its ability to issue revenue bonds, exercise eminent domain, and facilitate public-private partnerships to advance complex projects that traditional utility planning might overlook.

The document translates the ICJ's 2025 Advisory Opinion on climate change into practical legal tools for climate litigation. It details State obligations under international treaties (UNFCCC, Paris Agreement) and customary law, emphasizing a 'rigorous' due diligence standard to limit global warming to 1.5°C. The guide covers specific litigation areas including government framework cases, adaptation, reparations, the right to a healthy environment, corporate conduct, climate finance, speculative interventions (like geoengineering), and regulatory backsliding, providing key quotes and illustrative case examples for each.