Search Climate Insights Directory

In 2008, Georgia was the highest spender on net coal imports in the United States, sending $2.62 billion out of state. The state's electricity generation relied on coal for 62.7% of its power despite having no internal coal supplies. The document argues that investing in energy efficiency and homegrown renewables, such as biomass from the forestry industry, solar, and wind, could improve energy independence and local economic development.

In 2008, Illinois imported 94 percent of the coal used in its power plants, resulting in a net expenditure of $683 million. The document highlights that Midwest Generation and the Baldwin Energy Complex are major contributors to this import dependency. To mitigate these costs and reduce carbon dioxide emissions, the report advocates for the state's energy efficiency resource standard and its renewable energy goals, noting that Illinois has the technical potential to generate over five times its 2008 electricity needs from renewable sources, primarily wind and bioenergy.

In 2008, Michigan imported all the coal used by its power plants, resulting in an economic drain of $1.36 billion. The state's electricity generation relied on coal for over 60% of its needs, with Detroit Edison's Monroe facility identified as the most import-dependent plant. To reduce this dependence and stimulate the local economy, the document advocates for investments in energy efficiency and homegrown renewable energy, noting that Michigan has the technical potential to produce nearly twice its 2008 electricity needs from renewables, primarily wind and bioenergy.

Missouri is highly dependent on imported coal, spending $1.13 billion in 2008 to import over 99% of the coal used by its power plants. The document highlights that this expenditure represents a significant economic drain, suggesting that energy efficiency standards and renewable energy resources, such as wind and bioenergy, could redirect funds back into the local economy.

North Carolina spent $2.35 billion on imported coal in 2008, ranking second among US states for total net imports. The document highlights that the state relies on coal for 60.5% of its electricity generation despite having no in-state coal supplies. It advocates for a transition to energy efficiency and homegrown renewables, such as biomass, solar, wind, and small-scale hydropower, to reduce this economic drain and improve energy independence.

Ohio experienced a significant economic drain in 2008 due to its heavy reliance on imported coal, spending a net $1.49 billion on these imports. The document highlights that coal provided 85.2% of the state's electricity in 2008 and suggests that transitioning to energy efficiency and homegrown renewables, such as wind and solar, can stimulate local economic development and increase energy independence.

South Carolina spent $1.1 billion on net coal imports in 2008, ranking 11th highest in total net imports in the U.S. The state relies on coal for 40.6% of its electricity generation despite having no in-state coal supplies. The Union of Concerned Scientists argues that investing in energy efficiency and homegrown renewables, such as offshore wind and solar, could redirect funds back into the local economy and improve energy independence.

Tennessee spent a net $1.21 billion on imported coal in 2008, importing over 99 percent of the coal used by its power plants. The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) is the primary purchaser of these imports, with the Cumberland plant identified as the state's most import-dependent facility. To reduce this economic drain, the document suggests adopting an energy efficiency resource standard and a renewable electricity standard, noting that wind, solar, small-scale hydropower, and biomass could technically meet up to 60 percent of the state's 2008 power demand.

Scientists advocate for the U.S. to provide $1 billion for REDD+ to protect tropical forests, citing their role in carbon storage and biodiversity.

The Shrimp Aquaculture Dialogue (ShAD) has developed a comprehensive set of draft standards for responsible shrimp aquaculture, focusing on seven core principles: legal compliance, environmentally suitable siting, community consideration, responsible labor practices, shrimp health management, broodstock and stock management, and resource efficiency. The standards employ a performance-based approach, defining acceptable impact levels rather than prescribing specific production methods, and are intended for the top 20 percent of farms globally. Key environmental requirements include the prohibition of siting in mangroves and natural wetlands (with limited exceptions for infrastructure), the mandate for Biodiversity inclusive Environmental Impact Assessments (BEIA), and strict limits on nutrient effluent loads (nitrogen and phosphorus). Social standards require participatory Social Impact Assessments (p-SIA) and adherence to ILO core conventions regarding child and forced labor. The document also outlines strict biosecurity measures to prevent disease and mandates the transition toward 100% closed-loop hatchery sourcing for Litopenaeus vannamei and Penaeus monodon. The standards are designed to be verified through third-party certification via the Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC).

The document argues that for China to transition into a major global economic player, its businesses must move beyond legal compliance to embrace voluntary sustainability standards. It identifies a current trend of avoidance among CTNCs due to unfamiliarity and perceived Western bias, which risks damaging 'Brand China'. The authors propose a strategic framework—normalization, exceptionalism, and transformation—to help CTNCs and the Chinese government decide whether to ignore, mitigate, leverage, or promote specific standards to move up the global value chain.

The research demonstrates a historical divergence between the cost of energy commodities and the cost of the services they provide. While energy prices often rose due to taxes or shifts to higher-quality fuels, the prices of energy services generally declined since the Industrial Revolution due to technological efficiency gains. The author argues that using energy prices instead of service prices in economic models leads to incorrect estimates of consumer responsiveness and inaccurate forecasts of carbon dioxide emissions.

Between 2004 and 2007, Cuba transitioned from a fragile, centralized power system plagued by frequent blackouts to a more resilient model. This was achieved through 'La Revolución Energética', which combined the mass replacement of inefficient appliances (lamps, refrigerators, air conditioners) with the installation of 1,854 diesel and fuel-oil-fired microgenerators. This decentralized architecture improved resilience against hurricanes and reduced oil consumption per kWh compared to central plants, while the country began shifting toward long-term renewable goals including wind, solar, and bagasse cogeneration.

The report argues that independent owner-operators in the U.S. are trapped in a cycle of using inefficient used Class-8 trucks due to subprime credit status and high upfront costs for new vehicles. It proposes the Federal Freight Efficiency Authority (FFEA), modeled after the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), to insure lease payments for new, efficient trucks. This mechanism would lower interest rates for truckers, increase their profit margins, and incentivize OEMs to produce more efficient vehicles. The author estimates that expanding this to small fleets could reduce Class-8 fuel consumption by 32%, saving 55 billion gallons of oil over ten years. The FFEA would be self-funded through insurance premiums and could potentially supplement the Highway Trust Fund with its profits.

The report finds that Estonia's transport system is not developing sustainably, with car use and road freight growing in tandem with the economy, leading to high energy intensity and greenhouse gas emissions. While traffic fatalities have decreased significantly, urban air quality has suffered due to increased particulate matter from cars. The report compares Estonia's performance with EU averages and neighbors (Finland and Latvia), noting that Estonia has some of the least fuel-efficient new cars in Europe. Three scenarios for 2020 are analyzed: a 'BAAS' (baseline) scenario where trends continue, a 'TEHNO' scenario focusing on rapid vehicle efficiency gains, and an 'EFEKT' scenario focusing on mobility management and sustainable transport modes. The authors recommend a combination of both TEHNO and EFEKT measures, including CO2-based vehicle taxation, improved public transport and active mobility infrastructure, and integrated urban planning to decouple economic growth from transport demand.

The document examines the steel sector's role in global emissions, focusing on abatement opportunities in China and India. It identifies four currently available abatement categories—closing inefficient plants, improving efficiency in existing plants, using best available technology (BAT) for new builds, and increasing scrap recycling—and notes that deep cuts will require carbon capture and storage (CCS) or breakthrough technologies after 2020. The report argues that carbon pricing alone is insufficient to overcome barriers like high capital costs and lack of policy, suggesting that Sectoral Approaches and Agreements should combine price and non-price incentives. Initial modelling suggests that with a carbon price of $25/tCO2, China could abate up to 150 MtCO2/year and India up to 40 MtCO2/year, potentially generating $2bn and $0.5bn in annual credits respectively.

The document compares different policy instruments for increasing energy efficiency in appliances across several EU member states, finding that while subsidies often lead to greater CO2 reductions, energy taxes generally provide higher welfare gains and lower administrative costs. The effectiveness of these policies varies significantly by product type and country, with tax credits for boilers proving highly cost-effective in Italy and Denmark, and the ban of inefficient washing machines being preferable to manufacturer tax credits in Italy and Poland, despite high overall welfare costs.

The report argues that India's push for jatropha to meet biodiesel targets has led to the forced displacement of tribal and lower-caste communities from their traditional lands. While promoted as a pro-poor, non-food crop for 'waste land', the report finds that jatropha often displaces food crops and common resources, fails to thrive due to poor understanding of growing conditions, and is unlikely to be commercially viable as a monoculture.

The report examines the barriers and opportunities for implementing life cycle costing (LCC) in sustainable public procurement (SPP). It finds that while LCC is used in some industrialized nations, its application is often non-systematic and hindered by conflicting capital and revenue budgets, a lack of procurer expertise, and data gaps. The authors argue that LCC should be integrated into high-level public expenditure policy to shift the procurement mindset from 'best value for money' at purchase to 'best value across the asset life cycle.'

The report finds that while UK producer emissions remained relatively stable due to the 'dash for gas' and a transition to a service economy, consumer emissions increased significantly. This growth was primarily driven by rising final consumption levels, which outpaced technological efficiency gains. The analysis highlights that the UK's shift toward services shifted carbon-intensive production to other regions, particularly non-OECD countries, and that services are a major driver of indirect emissions through their global supply chains.