Search Climate Insights Directory

The document outlines a nine-step workflow for effective LDAR surveys, emphasizing the coordination between certified LDAR surveyors, onsite personnel, and compliance managers. It details specific technical requirements for OGI camera use, such as observing components from at least two angles and spending a minimum of 2 seconds per component. The guidance covers the entire lifecycle from pre-survey planning and site verification to leak documentation, repair strategies (immediate, scheduled, or deferred), and mandatory re-surveys within 15 days to confirm mitigation. It also highlights common pitfalls, such as operator fatigue and the misclassification of designed-to-vent equipment, while referencing U.S. EPA Appendix K for specific timing and stability standards.

The document categorizes methane emissions by spatial, temporal, and source characteristics and provides a detailed guide for identifying and repairing leaks across various equipment types based on onsite observations.

The document provides a detailed mapping between the Climate Bonds Buildings Standard and the EU Taxonomy, specifically for building acquisition, new construction, and renovation. It concludes that Climate Bonds requirements are often a "Higher standard" than the EU Taxonomy, particularly regarding operational performance verification and emission reductions. The guide also details how Climate Bonds' DNSH requirements align with EU legislation for climate adaptation, water protection, circular economy, and pollution control.

The guide outlines a framework for deploying capital to reduce methane and flaring in the oil and gas sector, with a particular focus on National Oil Companies (NOCs). It provides detailed recommendations for selecting eligible projects, quantifying emissions, and establishing credible KPIs and sustainability performance targets (SPTs) aligned with the IEA's Net Zero Scenario. The document also specifies requirements for external verification and reporting to prevent greenwashing.

The guide outlines a 45-minute workshop designed to initiate local idle reduction programs in school districts. It argues that while school buses are safer and more efficient than private cars, diesel exhaust poses significant health risks, particularly to children. The curriculum focuses on debunking myths about idling, explaining the health impacts of particulate matter, and providing implementation strategies such as policy enforcement and the use of auxiliary heaters.

The document outlines the technical requirements and strategic approach for projects seeking funding through the Green Climate Fund's Simplified Approval Process (SAP) in the field of ecosystems and ecosystem services. It defines ecosystem services, explains the role of ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA) in climate resilience, and identifies 'natural capital accounting' as a primary driver for a paradigm shift in investment. The guide provides a framework for measuring impact, lists examples of eligible and ineligible activities, and emphasizes the need for integrated, multisectoral approaches to overcome institutional coordination failures.

The document outlines the GCF's strategy for decarbonizing the energy sector through renewable energy (RE) and energy efficiency, specifically detailing the criteria and activities eligible for the Simplified Approval Process (SAP). It emphasizes three main axes of intervention: large-scale low-carbon electricity deployment, expanding energy access in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), and implementing innovative climate mitigation solutions. The guide provides a framework for measuring impact using quantitative and qualitative indicators, lists specific eligible and ineligible activities—such as excluding large-scale solar plants and most hydropower due to high environmental and social risks—and presents three project scenarios involving solar water heaters, rural energy kits, and solar-powered agricultural systems.

The document outlines the role of forests in climate adaptation and mitigation, identifies strategic intervention areas such as forest restoration and 'zero-deforestation' supply chains, and defines the criteria for a 'paradigm shift' in land use. It provides a performance measurement framework with specific indicators for GCF-level impacts and project results, alongside a matrix of eligible and ineligible activities for the SAP.

The document outlines the criteria and technical guidelines for cities to access the Green Climate Fund's Simplified Approval Process (SAP). It defines eligible 'secondary cities' as those with populations between 1 and 3 million, emphasizing the need for integrated, cross-sectoral approaches to decarbonization and resilience. The guide details eligible sectors—including energy, building efficiency, mobility, urban planning, adaptation, circular economy, waste management, and water/sanitation—while explicitly excluding new construction projects for housing, roads, or rapid transit systems. It provides a framework for measuring impact using quantitative indicators and offers three project scenarios: LED street lighting, district cooling networks, and integrated waste management.

The guide outlines the GCF's strategy to increase renewable energy (RE) shares in national energy matrices to mitigate climate change. It defines three dimensions for emission reduction: large-scale low-carbon electricity, increasing access to clean energy in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), and implementing innovative mitigation solutions like energy storage. The document specifies which activities are eligible for the Simplified Approval Process (SAP)—such as micro-scale solar grids and rooftop solar—and which are excluded, such as large-scale solar parks and certain biomass projects. It also provides a performance measurement framework focusing on tCO2eq reductions, financing leverage, and co-benefits like improved health and reduced deforestation.

The document outlines the technical requirements and eligible sectors for urban projects seeking funding through the Green Climate Fund's Simplified Approval Process (SAP). It defines eligible 'secondary cities' as those with populations between 1 and 3 million inhabitants and identifies key sectors for intervention, including energy decarbonization, building efficiency, mobility, and waste management. The guide emphasizes a multisectoral, integrated approach to achieve a 'paradigm shift' away from carbon-intensive urbanization, providing specific indicators for measuring impact and examples of activities that do and do not qualify for the SAP.

The guide outlines the technical requirements for GCF projects focusing on ecosystems and ecosystem services under the Simplified Approval Process (SAP). It defines ecosystem services, explains the role of Ecosystem-based Adaptation (EbA) in enhancing climate resilience, and advocates for natural capital accounting to shift investment paradigms. The document provides a framework for measuring impact through specific indicators and offers a matrix of eligible and ineligible activities to ensure projects maintain low environmental and social risk.

The document outlines the technical guidelines for the Simplified Approval Process (SAP) for REDD+, designed to help countries meet UNFCCC requirements and implement innovative demonstration activities to access results-based payments (RBP). It specifies a mandatory two-component project structure: one focused on UNFCCC compliance (such as national forest monitoring systems and strategies) and another on innovative field-level demonstrations (such as private sector investment and sustainable forest management). The guide emphasizes a landscape approach to address deforestation and forest degradation while ensuring minimal environmental and social risk.

The document outlines the technical requirements and strategic approach for GCF projects focusing on land use and forest resources via the Simplified Approval Process (SAP). It emphasizes the dual role of forests in climate adaptation and mitigation, highlighting the importance of carbon sequestration and ecosystem services. The guide identifies key intervention areas—including forest restoration, sustainable management of protected areas, deforestation-free supply chains, and REDD+—and provides a framework for measuring impact through specific quantitative and qualitative indicators. It argues for a 'paradigm shift' that decouples economic growth from forest consumption and encourages innovative private sector financing to overcome investment barriers in nature-based solutions.

The document outlines a framework for energy management in South African wastewater treatment works (WWTWs), emphasizing the role of level 1 energy audits to identify high-demand areas. It details specific optimisation strategies for aeration, pumping, and sludge management, noting that these interventions can yield energy savings up to 75%. Additionally, it provides a menu of financing mechanisms, including grants and energy performance contracts, to support the adoption of energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies.

The document outlines energy efficiency (EE) strategies for pumps and motors in South African wastewater treatment works, noting that pumping can account for 4% to 30% of a facility's energy use. It categorizes interventions by payback period and energy savings potential, ranging from no-cost operational adjustments to capital-intensive retrofitting. Potential energy savings from these combined interventions can exceed 50%. The factsheet also details various financing options, including municipal budgets, grants, concessional loans, and energy performance contracts, to support the deployment of these technologies.

The document identifies the secondary treatment stage as the highest energy consumer in wastewater treatment works, particularly in systems using activated sludge where aeration can account for 50% of process energy. It recommends benchmarking specific power consumption (SPC) and implementing interventions such as fine bubble aeration, dissolved oxygen control, and cascade aeration to reduce costs and greenhouse gas emissions. Financing options for these projects include municipal budgets, grants, concessional loans, and energy performance contracts.

The document advocates for product-level emissions reporting in the steel sector to enable purchasers to make informed decisions that drive decarbonization. It highlights the significant difference in energy and emissions intensity between ore-based steel (average energy intensity ~21.4 GJ/t) and scrap-based steel (~2.1 GJ/t). While increasing the share of scrap-based steel is a key lever, the document notes that recycled scrap is projected to meet only half of overall steel demand by 2050, necessitating technological improvements in ore-based production, such as green hydrogen-based direct reduction. RMI provides a Steel Emissions Reporting Guidance to help steelmakers report emissions by production process, allowing them to demonstrate both incremental reductions via scrap use and transformational reductions via process changes and zero-emissions electricity.

The guide explains the process for selecting up to three pollution control technologies, such as SOx scrubbers or particulate filters, within the TED system to account for emission reductions. It clarifies that the absence of listed controls indicates either no controls exist or they are integrated into the technology, such as catalytic converters in cars. For cases where multiple controls affect a single pollutant, the system assumes emission reductions are additive.

The document serves as a technical support guide for the LEAP software, offering instructions on optimizing calculation speeds, troubleshooting electricity generation modules, and clarifying the software's capabilities regarding GHG inventories and life cycle analysis. It also explains specific data entry functions, such as the distinction between exogenous and endogenous capacity and the use of share versus saturation units in demand analysis.