Search Climate Insights Directory

The document argues that Indonesia's legal framework fails to align with OECD Guidelines on Responsible Business Conduct, specifically regarding the recognition of Indigenous Peoples' land rights and the requirement for free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC). It highlights how 'national strategic projects' and the 'Omnibus Law' facilitate investment at the expense of human rights, often supported by military deployment. The coalition recommends that the OECD demand a timeline for the Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Bill, accelerated land recognition, and the cessation of military involvement in development projects.

The report finds that tax incentives are a primary feature of investment laws in EMDEs, often driven by investment promotion agencies (IPAs) with limited involvement from ministries of finance (MoFs). This institutional disconnect leads to fragmented governance, revenue losses, and increased exposure to investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) claims. While some countries are moving toward centralizing incentives under unified legal frameworks, monitoring and evaluation mechanisms remain limited and disconnected from policy-making.

The toolkit establishes a 'Harms Taxonomy' to classify the continuum from online misogyny to violent extremism, identifying online harassment, sexual extortion, and online impersonation as the categories most likely to intersect with extremist activity. It advocates for a public health-based, gender-transformative approach to prevention rather than pure securitization. The document analyzes legal frameworks in Canada, Jordan, and Kenya, noting gaps such as the lack of standalone TFGBV laws in Canada and concerns over vague cybercrime laws in Jordan and Kenya. It provides sectoral guidance for government, civil society, and platforms to ensure coordinated, rights-respecting responses to gendered harms.

The report analyzes how 16 reporting jurisdictions and several others in development operationalize OECMs through five primary pathways: ministerial instruments, national guidelines, administrative procedures, sector-based recognition, and mechanisms for areas beyond national jurisdiction. It finds a strong global convergence toward the terminology and criteria of CBD Decision 14/8, while noting that most countries prefer non-legislative policy tools over new laws to achieve conservation outcomes.

The report examines Mexico's progress toward the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework's '30x30' goal, focusing on the potential of OECMs to complement existing Protected Natural Areas (ANP). It identifies that while Mexico has a strong legal framework for social land ownership (ejidos and communities), inclusive conservation is hindered by state failure to enforce Indigenous rights, contradictory public policies, and budget cuts. The document details various conservation modalities, such as Wildlife Management Units (UMA) and Community Forest Management (MFC), and uses three case studies to highlight local motivations for conservation, primarily linked to water security and sustainable livelihoods. It concludes that for OECMs to be effective and inclusive, Mexico must establish transparent recognition processes, align agricultural subsidies with conservation incentives, and ensure the free, prior, and informed consent of local rights-holders.

The report documents the increasing recognition of Indigenous Peoples and traditional knowledge within the UNFCCC process, listing specific references across various policy areas including adaptation, finance, and technology. It highlights the role of the Local Communities and Indigenous Peoples Platform (LCIPP) and emphasizes the necessity of a rights-based approach to climate action, grounded in the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

The document analyzes how the global plastics economy, valued at $1.1 trillion in 2023, necessitates international trade cooperation to end plastic pollution. It explores four key areas: proposed treaty obligations (such as restrictions on chemicals of concern and waste trade), safeguards against disguised protectionism, the socio-economic costs of implementation for governments and MSMEs, and the treaty's relationship with other international instruments like the WTO and various Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs).

The document examines how the proposed international treaty on plastic pollution intersects with global trade, focusing on the transformation of supply chains, the risk of disguised protectionism, and the implementation costs for developing nations. It highlights that the global plastics trade was valued at $1.1 trillion in 2023, with over 78% of plastics traded internationally. The briefing analyzes four key areas: proposed treaty obligations (such as restrictions on chemicals of concern and waste trade), the use of non-discrimination language to prevent arbitrary trade barriers, the fiscal and technical challenges for parties—particularly MSMEs in developing countries—to meet new standards, and the treaty's relationship with other international agreements like the WTO and various Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs). It concludes that trade-related measures under MEAs have historically been compatible with WTO rules.

The document argues that both the EU and UK consistently set Total Allowable Catches (TACs) above scientific advice, failing to meet legal deadlines for sustainable fishing. It highlights a systemic failure to prioritise the recovery of depleted stocks, often citing 'choke' risks in mixed fisheries as a justification. The briefing calls for a shift toward ecosystem-based management and a quota allocation system that rewards low-impact fishing practices over historical catch data.

The report examines the evolution of consumer protection from traditional to digital markets, highlighting the 'equivalence principle' where online consumers should receive protection not less than that in other commerce. It analyzes how regional trade agreements (RTAs) and the WTO JSI Agreement on Electronic Commerce incorporate consumer protections, while noting that developing countries, particularly LDCs, often lack the legislative and institutional capacity to enforce these rights. The document recommends that developing countries leverage technology, trade agreements, and international cooperation to build robust digital consumer protection frameworks.

The report analyzes the role of Free Trade Agreements (FTAs), International Investment Agreements (IIAs), and Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) in the critical minerals supply chain. It highlights a fundamental tension: exporting countries seek to maximize domestic value addition and industrialization, while importing countries prioritize stable, affordable access to raw materials. Through case studies of Chile, Indonesia, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), the report demonstrates that while newer agreements are beginning to incorporate ESG standards and protect policy space for producers, old-generation IIAs still pose significant risks via Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) mechanisms. The authors recommend that exporting countries reform outdated treaties to secure industrial policy space and that importing countries support value addition in producer nations to enhance overall supply chain resilience.

The report asserts that geoengineering is not an unregulated frontier but is subject to restrictive international laws, including a de facto moratorium by the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and regulations under the London Convention/London Protocol (LC/LP). It warns that a proliferation of outdoor experiments, driven by voluntary carbon markets and recent COP29 decisions, threatens biodiversity and human rights. The author calls for a ban on outdoor experiments and the establishment of an International Non-Use Agreement on Solar Geoengineering.

The document analyzes how international agreements, regional legislation, and industry competition hinder the removal of fossil fuel subsidies in aviation and shipping. It argues that while fuel taxation is often restricted by bilateral agreements or regional directives like the EU's Energy Taxation Directive, emissions levies through the ICAO and IMO offer viable pathways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and fund the transition to sustainable fuels.

The report examines the intersection of trade and climate sustainability from an African perspective, focusing on the economic impacts of energy transitions, the risks and opportunities of voluntary carbon markets, and the challenges of transition mineral value chains. It critically analyzes the role of the WTO in green trade and provides specific policy recommendations to ensure that climate-related trade measures, such as Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanisms (CBAM), do not disproportionately harm developing nations.

The paper assesses how the EU's CSDDD may address gaps in Swedish national legislation regarding the human rights of Sámi reindeer herding communities affected by mining. While the CSDDD introduces mandatory due diligence and civil liability, the authors note it lacks explicit references to Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) and relies on a risk-based approach that leaves significant room for corporate interpretation.

The briefing establishes that fossil fuels are responsible for approximately 70% of carbon dioxide emissions since the industrial revolution, with a small number of companies contributing a disproportionate share. It highlights the role of attribution science in linking specific extreme weather events to climate change and details the growing trend of using the 'polluter pays' principle in litigation and legislation to hold these companies financially accountable. The document further argues that to meet the 1.5C target, global fossil fuel production must decrease significantly by 2030, supported by a transition to renewable energy and electric vehicles.

The report argues that offshore carbon capture and storage (CCS) is an ineffective and risky strategy that prolongs fossil fuel dependence. It highlights that proposed 'hubs' in the Gulf of Mexico and North Sea face significant technical challenges, such as pressure management and leakage from legacy wells, while relying heavily on public subsidies. The document concludes that CCS often covers for expanded fossil fuel production and calls for a halt to these projects to protect marine ecosystems and accelerate a just energy transition.

The document outlines the categories and procedures for obtaining mineral rights in Ghana, while critiquing the current system for allowing mineral rights to be awarded before environmental impact assessments are conducted. It highlights a lack of precautionary environmental management, specifically regarding the timing of Environmental Management Plan submissions and the absence of mandatory parliamentary ratification for mining lease extensions.

The document examines Ghana's mineral revenue system, where the Minerals Income Investment Fund (MIIF) manages state earnings and distributes 20% to the Mineral Development Fund (MDF). It details the allocation of these funds to entities like the Office of the Administrator of Stool Lands (OASL) and the Mining Community Development Scheme (MCDS), while highlighting critical failures in transparency, the inadequacy of community funding, and legal ambiguities in the 1992 Constitution that allow for the misappropriation of royalties by traditional authorities.

The report examines a draft WTO text designed to complement the 2022 Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies by prohibiting subsidies that drive overcapacity and overfishing. It details a 'hybrid' approach combining a broad prohibition with management-based exemptions and special and differential treatment (SDT) for developing nations. The text also proposes stricter rules for distant-water fishing and enhanced transparency requirements, including notifications on forced labour and aggregate subsidy levels. While not a final agreement, the report argues the draft represents a significant compromise to align global fishing subsidies with sustainable development goals.