Search Climate Insights Directory

The statement highlights that persons with disabilities are disproportionately affected by climate change due to systemic discrimination and barriers to emergency services. It critiques South Africa's current climate frameworks for lacking specific details on accessible infrastructure and tailored adaptation measures, calling for the integration of disability-inclusive design and representation in decision-making processes.

The document discusses the outcome of the INC-5 plastics treaty negotiations in Busan, noting that while no deal was reached, there is momentum for a treaty addressing the entire plastics life cycle. It highlights the tension between countries seeking strong rules on production and consumption and oil-producing nations resisting such measures, while calling for an equitable and holistic global agreement in future sessions.

The Citizen Forum for Economic Justice opposes the European Commission's plan to use an "Omnibus" directive to review and potentially roll back the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CS3D), the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), and the Green Taxonomy. The authors contend that private sector lobbies are using "competitiveness" and "administrative simplification" as pretexts to weaken corporate responsibility, specifically threatening the principle of civil liability and the requirement for science-aligned climate transition plans. They argue that these regulations are essential for meeting Paris Agreement commitments and protecting human and environmental rights.

The document argues that the European Commission's plan to use 'Omnibus' legislation to revise the CS3D, CSRD, and EU Taxonomy is a response to private sector lobbying under the guise of 'competitiveness' and 'administrative simplification'. The authors warn that this could undermine corporate accountability for human rights and environmental abuses, weaken civil liability for multinational companies, and jeopardize the EU's goal of carbon neutrality by 2050 and the Paris Agreement objectives.

The UK government has committed to reducing carbon emissions by 81% from 1990 levels by 2035, aligning with recommendations from the Climate Change Committee. While this ambitious Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) signals global leadership at COP29, the author emphasizes that achieving these targets requires active public consent and a dedicated engagement plan to support the rollout of renewable energy and clean power by 2030.

The document is an open letter from a broad coalition of individuals and organizations calling for COP30 to move beyond the mere recognition of climate disinformation and instead implement binding, verifiable measures to protect information integrity. It argues that coordinated disinformation, primarily funded by the fossil fuel industry, sabotages the energy transition, threatens public health and human rights, and undermines the goals of the Paris Agreement. The signatories call on governments to regulate tech platforms that profit from manipulative content and demand an end to greenwashing and the monetization of disinformation.

Mighty Earth argues that proposed amendments by the European People’s Party (EPP) to the EUDR would create loopholes for laundering high-risk commodities and undermine the investments of companies that have already developed traceability systems. The organization calls for the European Commission to withdraw the proposal to delay implementation and ensure the law enters into force in 2025, citing a poll where 84% of surveyed European citizens support swift enforcement.

A global network of women leaders from business, politics, and civil society urges world leaders to accelerate carbon pollution reduction. They demand that by 2025, governments increase NDC ambition to align with the 1.5°C limit, phase out fossil fuels, triple renewables, double energy efficiency, halt deforestation, and mobilize public and private finance, particularly for the Global South.

Climate justice activist Joshua Omonuk, representing the Agape Earth Coalition, calls for a fundamental shift in how climate adaptation finance is delivered to Africa. Highlighting that Africa receives only about 2% of total global climate funds, the author demands that COP29 establish a fairer system characterized by direct access for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Small Island Developing States (SIDS), a preference for grants over loans to avoid debt, and increased accountability for private sector polluters. The document also details a European tour conducted by the coalition to build political alliances with MEPs and NGOs to amplify these demands ahead of the summit.

Friends of the Earth International expresses solidarity with Mozambicans protesting fraudulent elections and state repression. The organization links the current social unrest to systemic poverty and inequality driven by neoliberal policies, IMF-imposed measures, and the extraction of natural resources by multinationals. It demands an end to police violence, accountability for killings, and a transition toward an equitable development model that respects the rights of local and indigenous populations.

Mighty Earth argues that a new law in Mato Grosso, Brazil, which penalizes companies participating in the Soy Moratorium by restricting tax benefits, undermines efforts to prevent deforestation in the Amazon and Cerrado. The organization highlights that the Soy Moratorium, established in 2006, contributed to a 69% reduction in deforestation across 76 monitored municipalities between 2009 and 2022. The statement warns that this legislative move threatens corporate deforestation-free commitments and conflicts with international regulations like the EUDR.

The statement criticizes the 2024 IMF and World Bank Annual Meetings, asserting that the global financial system is extractive and neo-colonial. It highlights that over half of African countries are in debt distress, with many spending more on debt service than on health and education. The document condemns IMF-mandated fiscal consolidation and austerity, arguing these measures crowd out essential social investments and disproportionately affect vulnerable populations. It further claims that the G20 Common Framework is ineffective and exclusive, favoring Paris Club creditors, and calls for African leadership via South Africa's G20 Presidency to seek sovereign debt solutions through the United Nations.

The Green Economy Coalition calls for a transformation of the Bretton Woods institutions, specifically the IMF and World Bank, to address outdated governance, unsustainable debt in the Global South, and the need for financial flows to align with the Paris Agreement and the Kunming-Montreal Biodiversity Framework.

The document is an open letter from South African civil society, labour organisations, and policy experts arguing that the National Treasury exercises disproportionate influence over government policy, often obstructing the progressive realisation of socio-economic rights. The authors specifically highlight the failure to transition the Social Relief of Distress (SRD) grant into a permanent basic income system, alleging that Treasury's adherence to an 'austerity' paradigm undermines constitutional mandates and inclusive economic growth.

A coalition of civil society, labour, and policy experts urges President Cyril Ramaphosa to curb the National Treasury's influence over social policy. They argue that Treasury's 'austerity' paradigm and opposition to a permanent basic income grant contradict constitutional obligations and the President's own stated goals, leading to the unfair exclusion of millions from the Social Relief of Distress (SRD) grant.

The document asserts that despite early commitments in 2019, French financial actors continue to support coal companies, undermining France's international climate leadership. It highlights that between 2021 and 2023, the four largest French banks financed 26 problematic coal companies. The author argues that voluntary policies are insufficient and calls for a mandatory regulatory framework with clear definitions of excluded companies and deterrent sanctions to ensure a complete exit from both thermal and metallurgical coal.

Mighty Earth expresses deep dismay over the European Commission's plan to delay the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) by twelve months. The organization asserts that this delay, prompted by industry and government pressure, undermines the EU Green Deal, damages the EU's international reputation, and threatens the integrity of its legislative process. Most critically, the organization claims the delay will lead to the destruction of over 200,000 hectares of forest worldwide due to the demand for commodities such as coffee, chocolate, beef, palm oil, and soybeans.

Friends of the Earth International, alongside other organizations, asserts that global governance is currently paralyzed by geopolitical tensions and the influence of transnational corporations, which marginalizes the Global South and fails to solve existential crises. The statement criticizes the upcoming UN 'Summit of the Future' as likely to maintain the neoliberal status quo and proposes a new framework based on equity between nations, the removal of veto powers in the UN Security Council, and the prioritization of civil society over corporate interests.

The statement contends that global governance is dominated by corporate interests and a few powerful nations, marginalizing the Global South and failing to solve crises like climate change. It criticizes the upcoming Summit of the Future as a likely exercise in maintaining the neoliberal status quo. The authors advocate for a democratic global government that abolishes the UN Security Council veto, restructures the IMF and World Bank, reforms trade and intellectual property regimes to support the Global South, and establishes accountable data and AI governance.

Civil society organisations have written to AIIB President Jin Liqun to express concern over the bank's limited engagement with external stakeholders. The group argues that the AIIB's current internal focus overemphasizes project benefits and underplays risks. They propose several critical discussion topics for the 2024 Annual Meeting, including the bank's fossil fuel divestment, Paris Agreement alignment, and the development of a Gender Action Plan. The letter also highlights logistical barriers for participants in Uzbekistan, including visa difficulties and the risks associated with the country's closed civic space.