Search Climate Insights Directory

Reclaim Finance analyzed transactions from 2021 to 2023 and found that four major French banks supported 26 problematic coal groups despite having policies to exit the sector. The report identifies four primary loopholes: exclusion only at the subsidiary level, lack of exclusion for minority stakes under 50%, exclusion of 'captive' coal plants at industrial sites, and reliance on confidential internal documents to justify financing companies without public exit dates. The author argues these practices are misleading to investors and regulators, urging the AMF and ACPR to sanction such 'greenwashing' and demand full transparency.

Mongolia possesses significant solar and wind potential, estimated at 2,600 GW, yet renewable energy only accounted for approximately 9% of total electricity production in 2023. The government aims to increase the installed capacity of renewables to 30% by 2030 under the 'Vision-2050' long-term development policy. While 12 solar and wind projects were active in 2023 with total investments of 533.15 million USD, the sector faces challenges in gender equality, with female representation generally below global averages. Current policy is governed by the Energy Law (2001) and the Law on Renewable Energy (2007), with specific tariffs set for wind (up to 0.08 USD/kWh) and solar (up to 0.12 USD/kWh) as of 2019.

The report argues that the global push to triple renewable energy capacity must prioritize the quality of investments over quantity to avoid 'green extractivism'. It introduces three core criteria for public finance: driving a 100% renewable future by phasing out fossil fuels, ensuring democratic energy systems through grants and decentralization, and centering human rights and nature. The document criticizes multilateral development banks (MDBs) for continuing to fund fossil gas and relying on debt-creating loans rather than grants. Through case studies in India, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Indonesia, it contrasts the harms of large-scale, profit-driven projects with the benefits of community-led, small-scale renewable energy solutions.

G20 governments provided at least USD 168 billion in public financial support for renewable power in 2023, which is less than one third of the USD 535 billion provided in fossil fuel subsidies that same year. Advanced G20 economies and China provided 95% of this support, primarily targeting solar and wind energy. To achieve the COP 28 goal of tripling renewable energy capacity by 2030, annual public support may need to double to approximately USD 336 billion.

The report introduces a machine learning-based approach and a detailed taxonomy to better capture private sector adaptation finance, which is historically under-reported. By applying this new methodology, the Climate Policy Initiative increased its tracked annual average private adaptation finance for 2019-2022 from USD 1.0 billion to USD 4.7 billion.

The document argues that financing is the primary barrier to the adoption of zero-emission trucks (ZETs) in India because financiers perceive them as nascent asset classes with uncertain residual values. It proposes a framework to unlock investment across ZET manufacturing, purchase, charging infrastructure, and grid upgrades through a combination of diverse financial tools, risk-managing business practices, and strategic de-risking interventions.

The document details the decline of Steward Health Care, from its 2010 acquisition by Cerberus Capital Management to its May 2024 Chapter 11 bankruptcy. It highlights a pattern of 'asset stripping' and 'sale-leaseback' transactions with Medical Properties Trust (MPT) that allowed investors to extract hundreds of millions in dividends while the health system faced severe understaffing, equipment repossessions, and patient deaths. The author argues that an ineffective regulatory landscape enabled this 'pillaging,' leading to the closure of multiple hospitals across several US states and recommending strict new laws on hospital ownership, financial transparency, and dividend payouts.

Reclaim Finance criticizes ENGIE for continuing to rely on fossil gas for over 50% of its 100 GW installed capacity and for pursuing new gas projects, such as the conversion of the Mejillones plant in Chile and a new plant in Nijmegen, Netherlands. The report highlights that French banks provided $3.4 billion to ENGIE between 2019 and 2023, representing one-third of its total funding, yet most lack robust sectoral policies to exclude gas power. Specifically, it notes that Société Générale's exclusion policy for Combined-Cycle Gas Turbines (CCGT) is ineffective because its emission threshold of 420 kg CO2-eq/MWh is higher than current CCGT emissions. Reclaim Finance calls on these banks to cease funding new gas projects and demand a transition plan that triples renewable capacity by 2030 instead of merely doubling it.

ClientEarth argues that the EMFAF and its predecessor (EMFF) have failed to meet their objectives, with significant funding still supporting capacity-enhancing and biodiversity-harming subsidies. The organization calls for a categorical prohibition of harmful subsidies by 2027, increased funding for Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) to meet EU nature restoration targets, and a shift in financial priority toward small-scale and low-impact fishers (SSF), who currently receive a disproportionately small share of funding compared to industrial fleets.

The report analyzes the roles of various public development banks (PDBs) in climate adaptation, identifying significant gaps in collaboration between international multilateral development banks (MDBs) and national development banks (NDBs). It highlights barriers such as misaligned project ticket sizes, lack of shared adaptation taxonomies, and local currency risks. To address these, the report recommends developing complementary taxonomies, utilizing country platforms and regional hubs, enhancing capacity-building, and leveraging blended finance to de-risk adaptation investments.

The report finds that the Government of Canada is providing an inefficient fossil fuel subsidy to the oil industry by charging transportation tolls on the Trans Mountain Pipeline (TMP) that are significantly below marketplace costs. Using three different valuation methods, the report estimates the total subsidy to be between CAD 8.7 billion and CAD 18.8 billion, which translates to a cost of CAD 581 to CAD 1,255 per Canadian household. The analysis concludes that the project fails all criteria for an 'efficient' subsidy and that the overall cost-benefit analysis shows a net cost to Canada of CAD 23.1 billion. To phase out this subsidy, the author recommends either raising tolls to economic levels or implementing a cost-recovery levy of CAD 1.00 to CAD 2.00 per barrel on Western Canadian oil shipments.

The document defines traditional and synthetic securitization and analyzes how these mechanisms can be used by fossil fuel companies to diversify funding and manage balance sheets. It critiques current 'green' securitization definitions for being too broad and proposes a three-dimensional framework—focusing on use of proceeds, asset character, and company commitment—to prevent the mechanism from indirectly financing fossil fuel expansion. Reclaim Finance advocates for a regulatory framework that ensures transparency and restricts securitization to sustainable energy activities.

The document examines TotalEnergies' use of the bond market to secure long-term financing, noting a trend toward abnormally long maturities extending to 2064. It argues that these bonds provide the company with unrestricted funds to pursue fossil fuel expansion, contrary to IEA Net Zero scenarios, while creating systemic and financial risks for the banks and investors involved. The report identifies specific financial institutions facilitating these issuances and calls for a total cessation of support for companies developing new oil and gas projects.

The document analyzes TotalEnergies' reliance on the bond market, specifically highlighting a trend toward abnormally long maturities (up to 2064) that secures funding for decades of fossil fuel projects. It argues that these bonds provide the company with total freedom in fund allocation, enabling the expansion of oil and gas projects in 53 countries despite global climate goals. The briefing identifies a 'loophole' where banks facilitate these emissions to avoid having the debt on their own balance sheets, and warns investors of the systemic risk of 'stranded assets' as the world transitions to renewable energy.

The report finds that while CETP signatories have significantly reduced international public finance for fossil fuels, they have failed to scale up clean energy investment at a comparable rate.

The voluntary carbon market (VCM) operates through a complex system of carbon credits, derivatives, and intermediaries. While intended to fund emissions reductions, the market is characterized by a lack of financial transparency and a tendency to prioritize cheap credits over impactful ones. Credits can be traded multiple times on a secondary market, where financial gains accrue to intermediaries rather than project developers. Trading occurs via spot markets for immediate delivery or through futures, forwards, and options for future settlement. Debt instruments, such as bonds, also provide upfront project financing. Data from 2023 indicates that industrial projects typically attract larger retirement volumes compared to projects with co-benefits like clean cookstoves.

The report identifies currency risk—specifically the mismatch between local currency revenues and hard currency debt—as a primary barrier to climate investment in EMDEs. It argues that while long-term solutions require macroeconomic reform and deeper local capital markets, immediate needs must be met through innovative hedging mechanisms. The document analyzes five specific models: a TCX donor-funded guarantee, Eco Invest Brasil, the Delta onshore DFI platform, FSD Africa's MDB portfolio transfer, and a CPI FX Hedging Facility for India. It concludes that concessional capital is essential in the short term to make these tools affordable and to catalyze private investment.

The policy brief contends that despite France's diplomatic leadership and the Paris Place's 2019 commitment to phase out coal, French financial institutions continue to fund coal development. It highlights the severe health and climate impacts of coal, the failure of voluntary commitments—specifically among four major French banks—and calls for a national legal ban on financial services for coal projects to ensure a credible transition.

An analysis of five leading private infrastructure firms—Macquarie Asset Management, Global Infrastructure Partners, Stonepeak, IFM Investors, and I Squared Capital—reveals a total lack of sectoral policies to prevent investment in fossil fuel expansion. Despite the sector's growth, with global assets under management surpassing US$1 trillion in 2023, these firms continue to invest heavily in midstream infrastructure and liquefied natural gas (LNG) projects, posing a risk to the global carbon budget.

The report highlights that steel and cement are the largest industrial emitters, accounting for over 7% and 6% of global CO2 emissions in 2022. It argues that credible corporate transition plans are essential for unlocking private capital, particularly through sustainability-linked bonds (SLBs). An analysis of 20 companies reveals that while 90% have published transition plans, there is a significant lack of consistency in financing disclosure and a critical gap in concrete 'just transition' objectives. The document emphasizes that emerging markets will lead demand growth and hold the majority of coal-based blast furnace capacity requiring reinvestment by 2030, making international coordination and supportive public procurement policies vital for a credible transition.