Search Climate Insights Directory

The document argues that while methane abatement is a cost-effective near-term strategy to limit global warming, capital deployment in the oil and gas sector is significantly lagging behind the targets required for the IEA's Net Zero Emissions by 2050 Scenario. It proposes a framework for using use-of-proceeds (UoP) bonds, key performance indicator (KPI)-linked bonds, and conventional debt with methane-related covenants to bridge this investment gap. The authors highlight the critical role of National Oil Companies (NOCs) and the need for credible, science-based guardrails to mitigate greenwashing and fungibility risks.

The brief analyzes rate hikes by State Farm in California, noting that an approved 17% increase will raise average premiums by $737 by 2025, and a requested further 11% increase could raise them by $1,015 by 2026 compared to 2023. It highlights extreme increases in high-risk zip codes, such as Calabasas, and argues that the fossil fuel industry is responsible for the climate-fueled disasters driving these costs.

The report analyzes organic waste management models in Indonesia and Brazil, finding that decentralized, community-based, and household-level systems often offer greater cost-efficiency (lower Levelized Cost of Waste Management) than large-scale centralized projects. While private operators achieve economies of scale, community groups face severe financial pressure due to low operational margins and reliance on short-lived assets. The study recommends holistic policy approaches, legal recognition for informal workers, and the integration of co-benefits like job creation and methane reduction to attract more diverse funding, such as green bonds and carbon credits.

The report analyzes organic waste management models in Indonesia and Brazil, finding that decentralized, community-based, and informal models often exhibit greater cost efficiency and lower levelized costs of waste management (LCOW) compared to large-scale industrial projects. While labor remains the primary operational expense across all models, decentralized systems face significant financial strain due to low operating margins and reliance on short-lived assets. The study recommends a holistic approach that integrates waste management with health and climate goals, provides legal certainty for informal workers, and implements transparent monitoring systems to unlock diverse financing sources.

This report analyzes the financial viability and cost-efficiency of decentralized organic waste management models in Indonesia and Brazil. It compares government-operated, private, and community-led systems, finding that decentralized models—such as community groups in Indonesia and home composting in Brazil—often achieve lower Levelized Cost of Waste (LCOW) despite facing significant financial tensions and limited public funding. The study highlights that labor is the primary operating expense across all models and recommends a holistic approach that integrates informal workers and community actors into formal legal and financial frameworks to scale methane abatement.

The document argues that despite the COP 28 agreement to transition away from fossil fuels, production continues to rise, led by wealthy nations. It calls for COP 30 to establish differentiated phase-out timelines based on historical responsibility, mandate annual progress reports, and launch the Belém Action Mechanism for Just Transition. The briefing emphasizes that the transition is economically feasible if Global North countries redirect fossil fuel subsidies and tax polluters to mobilize over USD 5,000 billion annually for climate finance, prioritizing grants over loans to avoid exacerbating debt in the Global South.

The report argues that outsourcing critical school functions to private equity-backed firms prioritizes short-term profit over student wellbeing and worker stability, leading to lower service quality, increased staff turnover, and risks to student data privacy.

The 'Banking on Renewables' report critiques the current funding models of Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs), arguing that the rush to increase renewable energy capacity often leads to 'green extractivism' and human rights violations. It proposes three core criteria for public funding: financing a total transition to 100% renewables (excluding 'false solutions' like CCUS), ensuring democratic and decentralized energy systems, and centering people and the planet. Through case studies in India, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Indonesia, the report contrasts large-scale projects that displace communities with community-led initiatives that improve local livelihoods. It concludes with a ten-point action plan urging MDBs to increase grants over loans, adopt a strict renewable energy taxonomy, and mandate Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) for all projects.

The document argues that European banks continue to support Glencore's coal expansion through general-purpose bond issuances, enabled by inadequate exclusion thresholds and policy loopholes regarding metallurgical coal and corporate-level financing.

The report identifies that between January 2024 and April 2025, twenty major banks, including nine European institutions, participated in 12 Glencore bond issuances totaling US$8 billion. These funds, intended for general corporate purposes, can support Glencore's 17 coal mining expansions across Australia, South Africa, Canada, Russia, and Kazakhstan, which contradicts IEA climate scenarios. The report argues that European banks continue this support through policy loopholes such as inadequate exclusion thresholds and restrictions that only apply to new customers or project-level financing.

The report argues that the private equity business model, characterized by high debt and a focus on short-term returns, is incompatible with the goals of value-based care (VBC). It details how three VBC companies—CareMax, Cano Health, and Clinical Care Medical Centers (CCMC)—filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2024 due to unsustainable debt levels. The document highlights that these companies served vulnerable dual-eligible Medicare and Medicaid populations and that their failures accelerated healthcare consolidation, as assets were bought by vertically integrated insurers like Humana. It concludes with policy recommendations to limit debt in leveraged buyouts and increase antitrust enforcement.

The report details Glencore's expansion of coal capacity and the role of European banks in financing these activities through bond issuances, highlighting loopholes in bank coal policies.

The report evaluates Ukraine's green transition readiness, identifying 'Significant Progress' in climate change and energy, 'Some Progress' in clean industry, buildings, transport, agriculture, biodiversity, and finance, and 'Little Progress' in zero-pollution, just transition, digitalization, and research and innovation. It emphasizes the need for high-level coordination, a national sustainable finance taxonomy, and the integration of 'build back better' principles into post-war reconstruction to achieve climate neutrality by 2050.

The briefing contends that the Asian Development Bank (ADB) uses technical assistance (TA) to enable fossil gas infrastructure and planning, despite pledges to align with the Paris Agreement. It highlights how vague terms like 'low-carbon' and 'transition infrastructure' allow the ADB to support gas-related projects in countries such as Pakistan and Indonesia. The document notes that TA for energy projects in 2024 lacked fuel specifications in 45.9% of cases, hindering transparency. It further argues that these projects often ignore gender impacts and risk creating stranded assets. The author recommends that the ADB explicitly exclude fossil gas from its 'clean energy' definitions and phase out all direct and indirect support for midstream and downstream gas infrastructure.

Reclaim Finance is calling on ArcelorMittal shareholders to escalate engagement at the 2025 AGM by voting against management-proposed resolutions. The organization argues that the company is backtracking on climate goals, delaying direct reduced iron (DRI) projects, and allocating insufficient capital to decarbonization, with only US$0.3-0.4 billion of planned 2025 capital expenditures dedicated to such projects.

The report highlights that agrifood systems in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) are major emission sources but receive only 8% of climate finance. It proposes blended finance as a mechanism to mitigate risks—such as lack of credit history and misaligned investment terms—to unlock private capital. The text notes that 59 blended finance transactions totaling $7 billion have occurred in the region, primarily in Brazil and Colombia, with a significant focus on agroforestry.

The document assesses the World Bank, Asian Development Bank (ADB), and African Development Bank (AfDB) against criteria for renewable energy transition, democratic energy systems, and environmental and social safeguards. It finds that these institutions often prioritize loans over grants, maintain gender-blind financing, and continue to invest in 'false solutions' such as large hydropower and hydrogen, despite their stated climate commitments.

The analysis finds that Engie's 2025 climate plan lacks a phase-out date for fossil gas and continues gas expansion through new plants and LNG contracts. While renewable targets increased to 95 GW by 2030, the company remains on a 'well below 2°C' trajectory rather than 1.5°C, with a decarbonization goal of 2045 that contradicts IEA Net Zero scenarios. CAPEX for fossil technologies remains nearly stable, and the company's reliance on hydrogen and biomethane is viewed as a risk for perpetuating fossil systems.

Reclaim Finance disputes the Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations' (CDC) justifications for its lack of transparency and argues that the CDC's shareholder engagement strategy is insufficient to stop investment in fossil fuel expansion. The document highlights a conflict between the CDC's secrecy and recommendations from the Cour des Comptes, while clarifying discrepancies in the reporting of fossil fuel exposure figures.

Reclaim Finance criticizes BPCE for its continued financial support of major oil and gas developers and LNG infrastructure, noting that the bank lacks the ambitious exclusion policies and exposure-reduction targets adopted by other major French banks.