Search Climate Insights Directory

The document outlines energy efficiency (EE) strategies for pumps and motors in South African wastewater treatment works, noting that pumping can account for 4% to 30% of a facility's energy use. It categorizes interventions by payback period and energy savings potential, ranging from no-cost operational adjustments to capital-intensive retrofitting. Potential energy savings from these combined interventions can exceed 50%. The factsheet also details various financing options, including municipal budgets, grants, concessional loans, and energy performance contracts, to support the deployment of these technologies.

The document outlines how solar PV technology can be integrated into South African municipal wastewater treatment works (WWTWs) to lower energy bills and greenhouse gas emissions. It details various installation configurations, such as ground-mounted, floating, and rooftop systems, and provides financial metrics including a payback period of 4 to 8 years. The factsheet also lists potential financing mechanisms and a step-by-step implementation process for municipal officials and private developers.

The document assesses the potential for Western Cape businesses to leverage time-of-use (TOU) tariffs through BESS arbitrage, comparing the repurposing of existing systems against new installations. It finds that while upgrading existing BESS offers high internal rates of return (IRR), new installations are more sensitive to tariff escalation rates and investment horizons, with a 15-year outlook generally improving financial performance.

The document provides a guide for Western Cape businesses on adopting solar PV to reduce energy costs and carbon footprints. It details various financing models—including outright purchase, debt finance, and Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs)—and provides pricing benchmarks for 2025/26. The brief highlights the role of municipal feed-in tariffs and national tax incentives, while warning of risks related to changing utility tariff structures and policy shifts.

South Africa's energy subsidies reached at least ZAR 198 billion (USD 10.8 billion) in FY 2025, with 55% consisting of direct fossil fuel subsidies. The report highlights that electricity subsidies, largely driven by bailouts for the state-owned utility Eskom, support a coal-dominated system where 83% of generation came from fossil fuels in 2024. Key inefficiencies identified include a carbon tax with an effective rate as low as ZAR 7/tCO2 in FY 2022 due to high exemptions, and a Free Basic Electricity (FBE) policy where an estimated 80% of funding is not reaching eligible households. The author recommends a stakeholder-led action plan to align subsidies with just transition frameworks, revise the carbon tax to reflect the social cost of carbon, and shift blanket liquid fuel subsidies toward targeted transport support for low-income households.

The document introduces a guidebook and a series of reports focused on the management and financing of soil rehabilitation in China. It aims to harness green finance approaches to attract private investors and blend public and private capital for the remediation of contaminated soils, supporting China's environmental priorities and its first soil pollution law.

Uttar Pradesh faces significant energy access gaps with 14.6 million households lacking electricity and existing users experiencing poor service quality. The state's electricity distribution companies are financially unsustainable, with a revenue gap reaching 17,042 crores ($2.6 billion in FY 2015), partly due to low meter installation rates in rural areas (25%) compared to urban areas (85%). Over 80% of the state's power generation relies on coal, and financial losses are currently managed through the state government assuming debt via the UDAY scheme.

The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) argues that COVID-19 recovery spending provides a critical opportunity to shift public finance away from fossil fuels and toward clean energy. The proposed blueprint includes stopping public funding for fossil fuel production, reforming subsidies and implementing taxes to raise an estimated USD 553 billion annually, and incentivizing private investment in clean electricity. The framework emphasizes a just transition involving dialogue between workers, employers, and governments to ensure no one is left behind during the energy transition.

The assessment concludes that the onshore wind portfolio is a more resilient and profitable investment than a comparable gas-fired power plant when climate risks and externalities are internalized. While the wind portfolio's performance slightly diminishes when externalities are monetized, the gas-fired plant becomes financially unattractive, with its internal rate of return (IRR) turning negative under a carbon tax scenario.

The NAP Global Network serves as a platform for bilateral donors to coordinate support for National Adaptation Plans (NAPs) in developing countries, aiming to reduce duplication of efforts and align funding with national priorities. The network facilitates peer learning, identifies gaps in support, and explores co-financing opportunities, noting that bilateral aid for adaptation was more than three times higher than multilateral aid in 2013.

The letter criticizes Leonard Green & Partners for aggressive financial policies at Prospect Medical Holdings, including dividend recapitalizations and a controversial $10 million buyout. It highlights a dramatic decline in EBITDA, high debt levels, and poor hospital quality ratings, arguing that these actions prioritize short-term private equity gains over long-term healthcare stability and patient care.

The report argues that the private equity (PE) industry uses aggressive financial engineering to extract short-term value from companies, a process facilitated by specific U.S. tax loopholes. Key mechanisms include the carried interest loophole, interest deductions, and fee waivers, which allow PE managers to pay significantly lower tax rates than ordinary workers. The document provides case studies in housing, healthcare, energy, and labor to illustrate the negative impacts of this model, such as increased hospital mortality rates, the proliferation of high-emission LNG terminals, and the degradation of manufactured housing parks.

The report argues that Apollo Global Management's private equity model—characterized by high leverage and cost-cutting—has harmed patients and workers across its 220 hospitals. It documents specific instances of service cuts, poor quality ratings, and regulatory failures, while questioning the anti-competitive nature of the Lifepoint-ScionHealth spinoff.

The report finds a significant imbalance in energy financing among the 65 largest global banks, with a ratio of 0.42:1 in favor of fossil fuels over sustainable power supply between 2021 and 2024. This is far below the 6:1 ratio by 2030 recommended by the IEA's Net Zero Emissions scenario. While European banks show slightly better ratios, financing for sustainable power remains heavily concentrated in OECD countries and China, leaving emerging markets underfunded. The report also criticizes banks for using 'blurry' targets and problematic technologies like CCUS and bioenergy to inflate their green credentials.

The Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund (the Oil Fund) held US$6.15 billion in bonds across 39 oil and gas developers as of June 2024. The report argues that these bonds provide fresh capital for upstream and midstream expansion, contradicting the Fund's ambition to lead in climate risk management. Case studies on TotalEnergies, Enbridge, and ExxonMobil highlight the misalignment between the Fund's financial support and the companies' lack of credible transition plans. The authors recommend a policy to halt new bond purchases from oil and gas developers and a phased divestment from existing holdings.

The 'Scan de la Finance Fossile' evaluates 56 French financial institutions on their policies regarding high-risk oil and gas sectors. The analysis finds that fewer than half of these actors have policies covering any of the five most risky sectors, and existing policies often contain loopholes that allow continued financing of companies and infrastructure that facilitate fossil fuel expansion.

The French Nat-Cat scheme, a public-private partnership, is facing instability as the public reinsurer (CCR) absorbs an increasing share of claims, with losses exceeding €3 billion between 2015 and 2024. While policyholders face higher premiums and local authorities struggle to secure coverage in high-risk areas, ten of the largest European insurers and reinsurers have reported record financial performance, with cumulative net income increasing by 60% between 2010 and 2024. Reclaim Finance argues that the current burden-sharing is unfair and urges public authorities to mobilize these profitable insurers to fund climate disaster prevention and damage compensation.

The report reveals that BNP Paribas, Crédit Agricole, Société Générale, and BPCE provided $10 billion in financing to Bunge and Cargill between January 2024 and September 2025, despite the traders' exposure to deforestation risks in Brazil. Analysis shows that Bunge and Cargill are linked to 11,800 hectares of deforestation in the Amazon and 91,000 hectares in the Cerrado during this period. The document criticizes the deforestation policies of the involved banks as insufficient, lacking clear objectives, and opaque in their implementation.

The report 'Five Years Lost' details 12 major fossil fuel expansion projects globally, estimating they would collectively emit at least 175 gigatons of CO2, consuming up to 75% of the remaining carbon budget for a 66% probability of limiting warming to 1.5°C. It identifies a systemic failure in the finance industry, noting that between January 2016 and August 2020, financial institutions provided $1.6 trillion in loans and underwriting and $1.1 trillion in investments to 133 companies driving these projects. The document highlights the role of public finance, specifically Export Credit Agencies (ECAs) and Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) like the World Bank Group, in de-risking these projects. Case studies cover diverse regions including the Permian Basin (USA), Vaca Muerta (Argentina), and the Barents Sea (Norway), emphasizing the associated human rights abuses, environmental degradation, and the 'myth' of natural gas as a bridge fuel.

The document provides data on investments and financing from French GFANZ members in fossil fuel expanders. Amundi Asset Management held the highest total investments at US$ 17,006 million, while BNP Paribas provided the highest total financing at US$ 7,096 million.