Search Climate Insights Directory

The document is a formal request to World Bank President Ajay Banga to halt financial assistance to Uganda due to the Anti-Homosexuality Act. The signatories argue that the law violates the World Bank's own non-discrimination policies and will hinder inclusive economic development. They cite previous World Bank actions in Uganda (2014) and Tanzania (2018) as precedents for suspending aid in response to discrimination against LGBTI people.

Recourse argues that the World Bank Group's Evolution Roadmap lacks essential commitments to the 1.5C goal and fails to rule out direct or indirect funding for fossil fuels, including through financial intermediaries and technical assistance.

Recourse criticizes the US nomination of Ajay Banga for World Bank president, highlighting his roles at Exor N.V. and Temasek, which link him to oil, gas, and nuclear investments. The organization argues that Banga's private sector experience promotes a profit-driven development model over genuine climate action and poverty reduction.

A coalition of civil society groups, including Oxfam Novib, Both ENDS, SOMO, and Recourse, criticizes FMO's October 2022 Position Statement on Impact and ESG for Financial Intermediaries. The groups argue that FMO's indirect investment model—which constitutes approximately 40% of its total portfolio—carries higher risks than direct lending but lacks sufficient safeguards against human rights abuses and environmental harm. Specifically, they highlight a gap in FMO's fossil fuel phase-out commitments, which apply to direct investments but not to those made via financial intermediaries, such as the Africa Finance Corporation. The statement also notes that a lack of transparency prevents impacted communities from accessing remedies for adverse project impacts.

Recourse argues that the MDBs' COP27 Joint Statement is a disappointment because it ignores the 1.5°C warming target and obscures the fact that MDB support for fossil fuels exceeds their financing for renewables. The organization highlights a lack of transparency regarding Paris Agreement alignment methodologies and calls for the MDBs to rule out fossil gas and LNG as transition fuels.

Recourse advocates for climate justice for Pakistan, which has suffered record heatwaves and floods affecting 33 million people. The organization demands that the World Bank and IMF provide grants rather than loans for reconstruction, cancel Pakistan's debt, and support a just energy transition based on sustainable renewable energy instead of imported fossil gas.

The document critiques the IFC's Green Equity Approach (GEA), noting that while it commits to ending equity investments in financial institutions without a plan to phase out coal by 2030, it contains loopholes that allow continued fossil fuel support. It proposes ten specific reforms, including ending support for new oil and gas projects, scaling up renewable energy, and adopting a rights-based approach with full transparency.

Nearly 60 civil society organisations have urged the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) to reform the consultation process for its Energy Sector Strategy (ESS) update. The organisations are calling for extended deadlines, multi-lingual accessibility, anonymous submission options, and the public disclosure of background papers and timelines. They specifically request interactive sessions on sub-sectors like hydropower, gas, and 'innovative' technologies, as well as clear guidance on investments in non-regional member states. Additionally, the group demands the integration of a 'Zero Tolerance' provision on reprisals against community members in project-affected areas.

The statement criticizes the World Bank and IFC for supporting an unsustainable gas-based energy model in Bangladesh and calls for an immediate shift toward renewable energy to avoid stranded assets and align with the Paris Agreement.

The document criticizes the World Bank and IFC for fostering Pakistan's dependence on expensive fossil gas and imported LNG, urging a shift toward indigenous renewable energy sources and transparent consultation with civil society.

The document highlights a contradiction between Indonesia's commitment to the Global Methane Pledge and the World Bank's Country Partnership Framework (CPF) 2021-24, which supports the acceleration of natural gas and biogas deployment. It warns that gas infrastructure projects, including power stations and LNG terminals, will increase greenhouse gas emissions. The author urges the redirection of finance away from fossil gas and unproven technologies like CCUS toward renewable energy, grid modernisation, and a just transition from coal.

Recourse urges development finance institutions (DFIs) to suspend Russia and Belarus as members, divest from their companies, and cease operations in both countries. The organization argues that the war is fueled by a global addiction to fossil fuels and calls for a ban on Russian fossil fuel imports and an end to financial support for fossil fuel infrastructure in Russia to avoid replacing Russian fuels with other fossil fuels like liquefied natural gas.

Recourse urges Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) to stop all direct and indirect fossil fuel financing and to commit to ambitious climate finance targets at COP26. The statement argues that current pledges, such as the MDBs' $175 billion commitment by 2025, are inadequate. It specifically criticizes the World Bank for promoting gas as a transition fuel through Development Policy Finance, the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) for a portfolio where fossil fuel spending nearly doubles renewable energy spending, and the Asian Development Bank (ADB) for approving nearly $5 billion in gas project financing since the Paris Agreement. Recourse also calls for the World Bank to match the African Development Bank's pledge of 75 million new off-grid connections by 2025 to address energy deficits in Sub-Saharan Africa.

A coalition of civil society organizations is demanding that the World Bank fulfill promises of a participatory review for its Africa energy strategy. The signatories urge the Bank to prioritize renewable energy and energy access, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa, while unequivocally ending financial support for fossil fuel-based development.

A coalition of 225 organisations argues that providing COVID-19 aid through Myanmar's military junta would legitimize the regime and undermine public health, calling instead for direct support to civil society and the protection of gas revenues for humanitarian use.

Recourse expresses solidarity with the family and community of Rubén Herrera, a human rights defender and community leader in Santa Cruz Barillas, Guatemala, following his death in July 2020.

The Big Shift Coalition calls on the World Bank Group to utilize development policy loans (DPLs) to accelerate the transition to renewable energy and decarbonization, particularly during COVID-19 recovery. The coalition expresses concern that DPLs continue to facilitate fossil fuel investments, citing a review showing that 52 of 121 DPLs from FY 2014-18 targeted oil, gas, or coal mining. They recommend a new operational policy prohibiting the financing of fossil fuel development and the inclusion of coal, oil, and natural gas in 'Excluded Expenditures' legal agreements. Finally, the coalition requests public consultation and transparency regarding the World Bank's ongoing review of its policy lending instrument.

The NGO Forum on ADB calls for the Asian Development Bank to align its energy policy with the 1.5°C goal, divest from coal, and provide unconditional debt relief to developing member countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. The letter also demands the 'No Dilution' of the 2009 Safeguards Policy Statement and the introduction of binding labor and social protections.

A group of civil society organizations and trade unions urged the International Finance Corporation (IFC) to implement binding protections for workers receiving Covid-19 response financing. The authors recommend that the IFC increase transparency by publishing a responsive financing strategy and a dedicated client website, integrate job preservation and occupational health and safety goals into loan documents, and establish an emergency grant facility for affected workers and communities. They specifically call for the prevention of discriminatory retrenchment and the provision of paid sick leave and childcare. Additionally, the document requests detailed data on the social protection policies of current IFC clients and the criteria used for distributing $8 billion in pandemic-related financing.

Recourse and the NGO Forum on ADB have called on the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) to implement concrete precautionary measures to protect human rights defenders during the COVID-19 pandemic. The organizations highlight that lockdown measures, increased militarisation, and the suspension of courts have heightened the risk of arbitrary arrests, stigmatisation of marginalised groups, and limited legal recourse. They request that the AIIB establish secure communication channels, monitor for abuses in financed sectors, and explicitly warn borrowers against using assistance funds for the intimidating surveillance of communities.