Search Climate Insights Directory

The document outlines the concept of seafood jurisdictional initiatives (JIs) as place-based, multistakeholder approaches that combine policy reform with market-based mechanisms to address systemic sustainability barriers. It emphasizes the pivotal role of government authorities in defining boundaries, leading policy changes, and aligning national and international conservation targets. The guide details the incentives for governments to adopt JIs, such as fulfilling UN SDGs and UNCLOS commitments, and provides practical steps for policy-makers to prioritize actions, maximize impact, and monitor progress through collaborative frameworks.

The guidelines advocate for jurisdictional initiatives (JIs) as a complementary approach to traditional certification, ratings, and improvement (CRI) efforts. While CRI focuses on individual farms or fisheries, JIs operate at a broader scale to address systemic issues like climate resilience, biodiversity loss, and labor rights through policy reform and multistakeholder collaboration. The document outlines key enablers for success, including government leadership, long-term blended finance, and ecosystem-based management. It also provides frameworks for monitoring, reporting, and verifying claims, emphasizing that performance outcomes typically take eight to 20 years to materialize. Case studies, such as the Parties to the Nauru Agreement (PNA) for tuna and a shrimp aquaculture project in Indonesia, illustrate the application of these principles.

The document summarizes the outcomes of the WWF Plastic Policy Summit held in March 2023. It argues for an urgent shift from a linear to a circular economy through a full life cycle approach to plastic, emphasizing the need for immediate action before the 2025 global treaty negotiations. The report identifies nine strategic interventions, ranging from reducing virgin plastic production to expanding deposit return systems, and provides specific policy and operational recommendations for federal, state, and local governments, as well as the private sector. A central theme is the prioritization of environmental justice to protect communities historically burdened by plastic production and waste.

The document details a multi-stakeholder approach to ending plastic pollution, emphasizing source reduction, reuse systems, and Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR). It advocates for a full life cycle approach that integrates environmental justice and data transparency to inform policy at local, state, and federal levels in the United States, while aligning with an upcoming global plastics treaty.

The document outlines a practical approach to evaluating internal controls in the context of illegal wildlife trade (IWT) enforcement. It emphasizes using a systems-based perspective—drawing on the COSO framework—to identify vulnerabilities that could be exploited by corruption. The guide details a research process involving semi-structured interviews, document reviews, and thematic analysis to generate specific, actionable recommendations for government agencies. It specifically addresses the needs of programs in early stages of maturity where controls may be informal or ad hoc, and provides tools such as data collection instruments and terms of reference for consultants.

The document outlines a significant increase in corporate awareness of nature's role in achieving Net Zero and business resilience between 2020 and 2023. While policy frameworks like the EU Deforestation Regulation and the Global Biodiversity Framework have provided clearer direction, food companies face substantial hurdles due to the complexity of measuring nature-based outcomes compared to carbon. The text emphasizes that food companies are uniquely positioned to impact nature due to their presence in the supply chain and advises a phased approach: identifying nature intersections, taking 'no regrets' actions like eliminating deforestation, engaging directly with farmers, and forming cross-industry partnerships.

The document outlines a systematic approach to evaluating internal controls—policies, procedures, and practices—to reduce corruption risks in illegal wildlife trade (IWT) enforcement. It emphasizes a holistic, process-oriented analysis based on the COSO framework, moving beyond financial audits to address operational risks such as evidence tampering and information leaks. The guide details a research process involving semi-structured interviews with diverse stakeholders, documentary analysis, and thematic coding to identify gaps and develop actionable recommendations. It specifically addresses the needs of agencies at early stages of maturity where controls may be informal or undocumented, and provides practical tools including a data collection instrument and resource requirements for consultants.

The author assesses the INC-2 negotiations in Paris, noting that while procedural delays occurred, a majority of governments aligned with the vision for comprehensive binding rules across the plastic lifecycle and global bans on high-risk materials. The text emphasizes the need for a circular economy, the role of the Business Coalition for a Global Plastics Treaty, and the specific responsibility of the US to reduce its disproportionately high waste generation ahead of the INC-3 meeting in Nairobi.

The document analyzes how corruption facilitates environmental damage by bypassing laws and influencing resource management. Through case studies in Madagascar, Peru, and Vietnam, it finds that anti-corruption efforts often fail when they are treated as secondary project goals, rely on purely technical solutions, or ignore the complex political dynamics and power imbalances inherent in resource governance. The report recommends strengthening risk analysis, improving donor coordination, supporting civil society and indigenous defenders, and enhancing transnational data availability to combat environmental corruption.

The document analyzes corruption in renewable resource management through case studies in Madagascar, Peru, and Vietnam, arguing that technical solutions often fail because they ignore the political ecology and power dynamics of resource control. It recommends strengthening risk analysis, improving donor coordination, supporting human rights defenders, and enhancing transnational law enforcement data.

The report analyzes the impact of corruption on renewable resource management through case studies in Madagascar, Peru, and Vietnam. It argues that anti-corruption efforts often fail because they are treated as secondary, technical goals rather than central political challenges. The document highlights how corruption facilitates environmental damage by bypassing laws and enabling illegal resource extraction. Key findings suggest that community-based management and technical solutions like e-payments are insufficient without addressing structural power dynamics, land insecurity, and the global nature of resource supply chains. The report concludes with five recommendations for conservation practitioners and donors, emphasizing risk management, donor coordination, support for civil society, protection of indigenous defenders, and the creation of global data systems for transnational law enforcement.

The document outlines the benefits, scoping, and implementation of corruption-oriented situation analyses within conservation projects. It emphasizes the importance of understanding local power dynamics, social norms, and legal vulnerabilities to design effective interventions. The guide provides a framework for stakeholder identification, data collection, and the formulation of recommendations, while highlighting critical considerations such as security, confidentiality, and gender perspectives. Three case studies from Latin America, Asia, and Europe illustrate the application of these analyses in fisheries, community forestry, and land-use planning, demonstrating how such studies can shift organizational mindsets toward a more systematic approach to anti-corruption work.

The document outlines a methodology for conservation practitioners to analyze how corruption impacts natural resource management. It details the benefits of such analyses—including improved understanding of power dynamics and local perceptions of corruption—and provides a step-by-step approach to defining scope, identifying stakeholders, and collecting sensitive data. The guide emphasizes a non-conflictual approach with governments and the importance of security and confidentiality. It includes three case studies: one in Latin America focusing on fishing permits, one in Asia on community forestry governance, and one in Europe on land-use planning, demonstrating how these analyses lead to systematic anti-corruption integration in conservation programming.

The document outlines the 'Map, Characterize, Assess, and Recommend' (MCAR) approach developed by the Basel Institute on Governance to identify and mitigate systemic corruption risks in the criminal justice system related to natural resources. It emphasizes a collaborative, systemic approach over isolated agency assessments, providing a step-by-step process from planning and process mapping to risk prioritization and the implementation of mitigation measures.

The document outlines the MCAR methodology designed by the Basel Institute on Governance to identify and mitigate systemic corruption risks in the criminal justice system as it applies to natural resource conservation. It emphasizes a collaborative, systemic approach over isolated solutions, providing a step-by-step process from planning and political-economic analysis to mapping law enforcement processes, conducting semi-structured interviews, and prioritizing risks through stakeholder workshops. The guide highlights specific vulnerabilities in conservation, such as the remote nature of transactions and the handling of physical evidence, and provides tools for creating mitigation plans and maintaining confidentiality to protect participants.

The document outlines a framework for conducting corruption-oriented situation analyses in conservation, emphasizing the benefits of understanding local power dynamics and perceptions of corruption. It provides guidance on defining scope, identifying stakeholders, and managing safety and confidentiality. Through three case studies in Latin America, Asia, and Europe, it demonstrates various methodologies—including vulnerability mapping, governance scoring, and legal framework analysis—to identify corruption risks in fisheries, community forestry, and spatial planning.

The report establishes a framework to categorize plastic products into 17 core groups based on their properties, use patterns, and pollution risks. It prioritizes these groups using a risk-based analysis (probability of environmental entry and resulting impact) and further classifies them into Class I (feasible for elimination or significant reduction by 2035) and Class II (requiring safe circulation and management). The findings suggest that while some single-use items and intentionally added microplastics can be eliminated, others—such as medical packaging and fishing gear—require management-focused controls due to technical or socioeconomic constraints.

Grasslands are critical for biodiversity and carbon sequestration, holding about one-third of global terrestrial carbon stocks, yet they remain vastly unprotected. In the U.S., over 70 percent of prairies have been destroyed, with 10 million acres lost in the Great Plains between 2016 and 2020. The document identifies federal crop insurance subsidies and the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) as policies that unintentionally encourage the conversion of grasslands to cropland. To reverse these trends, the author advocates for strengthening the "Sodsaver" program, ensuring energy crops from converted grasslands do not qualify for the RFS, and increasing investment through the 2023 Farm Bill and the North American Grasslands Conservation Act.

The author highlights the role of social media and technology in facilitating the illegal wildlife trade, which has an estimated annual value of at least 20 billion USD. To counter this, the Coalition to End Wildlife Trafficking Online—founded in 2018 by WWF, TRAFFIC, and IFAW—works with tech companies' Trust & Safety teams to improve content policies, training, and automated detection. Between March 2018 and September 2021, Coalition members reported removing or blocking over 11.6 million prohibited wildlife listings. The author warns that tech industry layoffs and personnel turnover threaten this progress and urges new tech teams to leverage existing institutional knowledge and partnerships with law enforcement and financial institutions to disrupt trafficking networks.

The report provides a comprehensive safeguards framework for a four-year, $11.1 million (including co-financing) project aimed at restoring forest ecosystems and reducing land degradation in the Lake Naivasha Basin (LNB). It outlines procedures to manage environmental and social risks, specifically addressing the rights of Indigenous Peoples (primarily the Maasai), gender inequality, and the potential for livelihood loss due to resource access restrictions. The framework mandates the use of Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) for activities affecting Indigenous Peoples and establishes a grievance redress mechanism to handle complaints, including those related to gender-based violence and sexual exploitation.