Guide pour l'évaluation des risques de corruption dans le cadre de l'application de la législation sur les espèces sauvages

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document outlines the 'Map, Characterize, Assess, and Recommend' (MCAR) approach developed by the Basel Institute on Governance to identify and mitigate systemic corruption risks in the criminal justice system related to natural resources. It emphasizes a collaborative, systemic approach over isolated agency assessments, providing a step-by-step process from planning and process mapping to risk prioritization and the implementation of mitigation measures.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • A central component of the MCAR approach is the creation of a visual map or diagram of actors and roles, which helps participants clarify responsibilities and precisely identify where corruption risks manifest within the system.
  • The guide recommends integrating a Political Economy Analysis (PEA) alongside the CRA to provide baseline knowledge, identify underlying drivers of corruption, and highlight strategic stakeholders who may support or oppose integrity interventions.
  • Corruption risk assessments in conservation contexts must account for specific vulnerabilities, such as the remote locations of national parks and border posts where agents are far from control mechanisms, and the risk of physical evidence 'disappearing' from storage.
  • The risk prioritization process involves a scoring system based on the perceived probability and impact (severity) of a risk, typically resulting in a focused list of 8 to 10 priority risks for mitigation.
  • To ensure sustainability and effectiveness, mitigation measures should be shaped by the 'risk owners'—those responsible for the procedures—rather than being imposed externally, and should be part of a circular cycle of monitoring and re-evaluation.

Cite the original document

APA
Governance, B. I. O. (2023). Guide pour l'évaluation des risques de corruption dans le cadre de l'application de la législation sur les espèces sauvages. WWF International. https://www.worldwildlife.org/documents/263/2vg2z7ddry_CRA_Widlife_LE_Guide_French.pdf
Chicago
Governance, Basel Institute on. Guide pour l'évaluation des risques de corruption dans le cadre de l'application de la législation sur les espèces sauvages. WWF International, 2023. https://www.worldwildlife.org/documents/263/2vg2z7ddry_CRA_Widlife_LE_Guide_French.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Governance |first1=Basel Institute on |title=Guide pour l'évaluation des risques de corruption dans le cadre de l'application de la législation sur les espèces sauvages |publisher=WWF International |date=May 2023 |url=https://www.worldwildlife.org/documents/263/2vg2z7ddry_CRA_Widlife_LE_Guide_French.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{governance2023guide, author = {Governance, Basel Institute on}, title = {{Guide pour l'évaluation des risques de corruption dans le cadre de l'application de la législation sur les espèces sauvages}}, institution = {WWF International}, year = {2023}, month = may, url = {https://www.worldwildlife.org/documents/263/2vg2z7ddry_CRA_Widlife_LE_Guide_French.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated