Search Climate Insights Directory

The report examines the financial and operational crisis facing South African municipal electricity distribution, characterized by rising bulk costs from Eskom and a massive infrastructure maintenance backlog. It proposes that municipalities leverage the growing amount of behind-the-meter rooftop solar PV—estimated at 3,495 MWp as of December 2024—to reduce reliance on expensive bulk purchases. By purchasing curtailed excess power and deploying leased BESS for peak demand arbitrage, municipalities could significantly increase operating surpluses to fund infrastructure renewal. The report specifically analyzes the City of Johannesburg, arguing that rooftop solar is not the primary cause of its revenue decline—which is instead driven by high technical and non-technical losses—and warns that punitive policies toward solar owners may accelerate grid defection.

The Public Affairs Research Institute (PARI) condemns violence, hate speech, and vigilante attacks against foreign nationals, refugees, and asylum seekers in South Africa. While acknowledging the anger of economically marginalised citizens, PARI asserts that these grievances are being weaponised by opportunistic forces to distract from the state's failure to provide essential services, jobs, and security. The organization calls for state leaders to unequivocally condemn anti-migrant rhetoric and for the implementation of a democracy that delivers a better life for all residents regardless of nationality.

The Public Affairs Research Institute (PARI) critiques the Draft Revised White Paper for Local Government, arguing that it relies too heavily on technical and managerial solutions for fundamentally political problems. PARI suggests that the proposed shift to a single-tier municipal system is politically unfeasible and warns that removing functions from weaker municipalities could undermine democratic accountability. The submission advocates for a stronger focus on the affordability of basic services, noting that 40% of households cannot afford them, and calls for a revitalisation of democratic social mobilisation to drive genuine reform. It also recommends formalising the role of traditional leadership through democratically responsive compacts and improving municipal communication to rebuild public trust.

PARI's submission on the Protected Disclosures Bill supports the expansion of whistleblower protections and the introduction of financial rewards but warns that the proposed central database lacks sufficient security and clear purpose. The institute argues that the current reward mechanism is too restrictive by limiting awards to court-convicted monetary sanctions, which may exclude administrative recoveries and discourage disclosures of serious crimes. PARI recommends relocating the database to an independent body, refining the scope of reporting obligations to reduce administrative burdens, and implementing a more flexible, incremental approach to financial incentives tailored to specific sectors like public procurement.

This position paper by the Public Affairs Research Institute discusses the need for real-time citizen engagement in South African public procurement to combat corruption and opacity. It leverages the Public Procurement Act (2024) to propose three specific oversight mechanisms: the introduction of civic observers for high-risk procurement, the expansion of community-level social audits, and the adoption of open data standards for end-to-end transparency.

The document argues that land is a strategic public resource central to South Africa's just transition, rather than merely a financial asset. It outlines how municipalities can use spatial planning, inclusive governance, and tenure protection to balance the land-intensive needs of renewable energy and climate adaptation with the need to redress historical spatial inequalities. The guide identifies significant municipal constraints, including dire finances, lack of consolidated land information, and complex overlaps with traditional authorities, while offering a roadmap for advancing distributive, restorative, and procedural justice through land administration.

The Public Affairs Research Institute (PARI) argues that South Africa's Public Procurement Act (2024), specifically sections 30 and 31, provides a statutory mandate for civil society to monitor procurement. To translate this into practice, PARI proposes piloting civic observers for high-risk contracts, expanding community-led social audits for local service delivery, and adopting the Open Contracting Data Standard (OCDS) for machine-readable transparency. The paper emphasizes that these measures shift oversight from retrospective audits to real-time risk mitigation and suggests that National Treasury can begin implementation using existing powers under the PFMA and MFMA even while the new Act is challenged in court.

The report critiques South Africa's National Climate Change Adaptation Strategy (NCCAS) 2020 and its 2025 Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) for failing to address the root causes of current vulnerability, such as poverty and inequality. It argues that focusing solely on system resilience—such as 'climate smart agriculture'—without reducing existing vulnerabilities like food insecurity leads to 'maladaptation' and risks a 'downward spiral of undevelopment.' The author proposes shifting from 'incremental adaptation' (technical adjustments) to 'transformative adaptation' (system transitions), incorporating a distributive justice framework similar to that used in energy transitions to ensure that the structural causes of vulnerability are dismantled.

The document identifies systemic communication failures across 12 South African municipalities, characterized by top-down messaging, internal silos, and a decline in traditional outreach. It recommends professionalizing communication units, institutionalizing two-way engagement, and integrating knowledge management to move from reactive to citizen-centered systems.

The document identifies structural and operational failures in South Africa's Integrated Development Planning (IDP) process, noting that community participation is often treated as a 'tick-box' exercise. Based on action research across 12 municipalities, it highlights issues such as poor meeting organization, declining youth attendance, and a lack of transparency. The brief recommends reframing the IDP as a developmental tool, improving institutional coordination, and implementing a Community Participation Index to move toward a more people-centered, bottom-up planning approach.

The document identifies systemic failures in South Africa's ward committee system, including poor resourcing, political interference, and a lack of institutional memory. It argues that while trust in these structures has declined, they remain essential for participatory democracy if transformed through better training, standardized reporting, and improved financial support.

The document details the COMPACT Local Government Collaboration Model, which uses a five-step process—Purpose, Making Sense of the Challenge, Vision and Hope, Implementing and Adapting, and Reflection and Learning—to improve municipal governance. The model was piloted in 2025 in the Blue Crane Route and Newcastle local municipalities to address water crises and local economic development, respectively. Key findings emphasize the necessity of immersive problem-understanding, constructive problem framing, and strong local political buy-in for sustainable collaboration.

This working paper examines the tension between quantitative 'precisionism' and qualitative 'groundtruthing' in climate-risk mapping within the global South, proposing a framework called 'epistemic diplomacy' to integrate both evidence types for more equitable and effective policy interventions.

The paper examines how AI tools for climate adaptation, primarily designed and governed by global North institutions, impose top-down risk representations that exclude the lived experiences and indigenous knowledge of global South communities. Using Cape Town's informal settlements as a case study, it illustrates how algorithmic abstraction can lead to ineffective policies and epistemic injustice. The author calls for a paradigm shift toward data sovereignty, participatory design, and epistemic pluralism to prevent 'smart' adaptation from replicating historical colonial patterns of exclusion.

The document argues that climate-risk mapping in the global South is currently split between 'precisionism'—the reliance on standardized indices and models—and 'groundtruthing'—the use of lived narratives and ethnography. Precisionism often creates a 'metrics mirage' that obscures social inequalities and justice claims, while groundtruthing struggles to gain policy traction in indicator-driven bureaucracies. To resolve this, the authors introduce 'epistemic diplomacy,' a power-aware procedural approach for integrating mixed evidence. This framework includes five guiding principles, a ten-step operating model, and specific governance safeguards to ensure community co-production and prevent knowledge extraction. The paper provides practical method pairings, such as combining heat sensors with social diaries, to create 'boundary objects' that maintain both technical precision and social meaning for policymakers.

The report examines various global regulatory models for electricity revenue determination, including rate-of-return, incentive-based, performance-based, and market-based pricing. It details the technical process of Cost of Supply (CoS) studies—comprising functionalisation, classification, and allocation—and discusses the trade-offs between fixed and variable tariff charges. The document concludes that South Africa should move toward unbundled, cost-reflective tariffs supported by regular, audited CoS studies and a more robust, incentive-driven revenue determination methodology to support its transition to a wholesale market.

The document evaluates the South African government's response to the Zondo Commission's recommendations across seven themes: criminal justice, public procurement, public administration, corporate accountability, state-owned enterprises, parliamentary oversight, and whistleblowing. While noting some legislative progress, such as the Public Procurement Act of 2024 and the General Intelligence Laws Amendment Act of 2025, it highlights significant delays in reforming the appointment processes for the National Director of Public Prosecutions and the SARS Commissioner. The brief argues that reforms have been 'positive but halting' and often fail to address the deep structural issues of patronage and political interference that enabled state capture.

The submission by PARI, TEI, the Equality Collective, and PSAM supports the Public Service Commission Bill's goal of enhancing the PSC's impartiality and independence. However, it argues that the Bill fails to implement critical reforms from the National Development Plan and the 2022 Professionalisation Framework, specifically regarding the PSC's role in supporting merit-based senior appointments to prevent state capture. The authors propose several amendments, including a new section (12A) to empower the PSC to facilitate recruitment, requiring the mandatory release of reports in the public interest, and removing the President's authority to approve remunerative work for Commissioners to avoid political leverage.

The document assesses the failure of South Africa's current free basic services (FBS) framework to provide a meaningful social wage for the millions of households living below the poverty line. It identifies three primary barriers: exclusionary municipal indigent policies, benefit levels (especially electricity) that are too low to meet developmental access needs, and restrictive conditions that hinder productive activities. The brief advocates for a redesign of the FBS and indigent register system that remains compatible with national budget constraints.

The Public Affairs Research Institute (PARI) assessed the implementation of the State Capture Commission (SCC) recommendations in South Africa. While progress was noted in asset recovery (R10.9 billion recovered by March 2025) and the establishment of the permanent Investigating Directorate Against Corruption (IDAC), the report highlights significant systemic failures. Key concerns include the delayed appointment process for the National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP), the lack of a finalized whistleblower protection framework, and the continued politicization of the public administration. The report argues that the government has relied too heavily on legislative bills that are either not yet in effect or incomplete, and that accountability for members of the Executive remains insufficient.