Search Climate Insights Directory

The document argues against a framework convention for the future plastics treaty, asserting that such a structure would delay concrete action. Instead, it recommends a substantive or hybrid treaty containing binding obligations and technical annexes. By comparing the successes of the Montreal Protocol with the perceived failures of the UNFCCC and Kyoto Protocol, the author highlights that mandatory national targets and efficient amendment processes for annexes are critical for effectiveness. The briefing warns that voluntary provisions and a lack of voting mechanisms in the Conference of the Parties (COP) risk creating an ineffectual 'paper tiger' agreement.

A CIEL analysis finds that 118 planned or underway petrochemical projects in the US could add 153.8 million metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent emissions annually, potentially increasing the sector's share of US greenhouse gas emissions from 5.2% to over 7%. The report highlights that ten megaprojects account for half of these potential emissions and that ammonia production is a significant growth area, with 95% of proposed US ammonia production derived from methane gas. Furthermore, the buildout is concentrated in already polluted areas like Louisiana's "Cancer Alley" and the Ohio River Valley, deepening environmental injustices.

The report examines the increasing integration of climate change into the monitoring work of UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies, highlighting a rise in climate-related recommendations to States in 2023. It specifically analyzes the role of these bodies in addressing fossil fuel phase-outs, the right to a healthy environment, loss and damage, and the rights of future generations, while identifying gaps in the scrutiny of carbon markets and international climate finance.

The document reports a violent forced eviction of Ngäbe indigenous families in Bocas del Toro, Panama, on July 17, 2024, involving the burning of homes and killing of livestock by riot police. It details the detention of between 50 and 90 community members, including women and minors, and argues that these events are the result of a systemic failure by the Panamanian government to grant collective land titles to indigenous peoples in 'áreas anexas' (adjacent areas) outside of comarcas. CIEL links this vulnerability to broader regional pressures from tourism, real estate, and infrastructure projects, specifically mentioning the IFC-backed Panama Line IV transmission project.

The report examines how the increasing frequency and severity of climate-driven disasters lead insurance companies to raise premiums or withdraw coverage, particularly in high-risk areas of the US. This process creates a 'domino effect' where the lack of affordable insurance makes homes unmortgageable, reduces property values, and increases homelessness. The authors highlight a cycle where insurers profit from these increases and reinvest in fossil fuels, further exacerbating the climate crisis. The document warns that widespread mortgage defaults and the devaluation of lender security could lead to a systemic financial crisis with global implications.

This document introduces a report by the Center for International Environmental Law regarding the negotiation timeline for a future plastics treaty. It highlights that while the United Nations Environment Assembly aimed for completion by the end of 2024, significant work remains, prompting an analysis of historical negotiation models such as the Minamata Convention, the Rotterdam Convention, and BBNJ.

A coalition of civil society organizations is urging the International Finance Corporation (IFC) to publicly release and transparently implement its new Remediation and Responsible Exit Framework. The statement argues that the IFC must recognize its international legal responsibility to repair damages caused by its projects and avoid the lack of disclosure that characterized previous pilot programs for Responsible Exit Principles.

A coalition of civil society organizations is urging the International Finance Corporation (IFC) to publicly release its draft Remedy and Responsible Exit Framework before finalization. The statement emphasizes that the framework, which aims to outline how the IFC delivers remedy to communities harmed by its projects, must be transparent to be credible. The organizations demand regular public reporting on the framework's pilot implementation, including lists of projects considered and evidence of successful remediation, and suggest the publication of all loan agreements to ensure stakeholder accountability.

The statement supports the Special Rapporteur's mapping report, specifically its focus on fossil fuels, loss and damage, and the risks associated with geoengineering and carbon credits. It calls for further investigation into human rights violations across the entire fossil fuel lifecycle to support a just transition and emphasizes the necessity of an intersectional approach to protect marginalized groups.

The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) and Earthjustice assert that climate change disproportionately affects marginalized populations and that the right to remedy, including reparations, is being denied to those suffering climate harm. They criticize the reliance on voluntary contributions for the UNFCCC Loss and Damage Fund and urge states to fulfill their legal obligations to provide redress, looking toward upcoming advisory opinions from the International Court of Justice and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights for clarification on state duties.

The memorandum examines the ITLOS advisory opinion, which establishes that anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions constitute marine pollution under UNCLOS. It highlights the 'stringent' due diligence required of States to protect the marine environment, the role of the best available science (specifically IPCC reports), and the principle that the Paris Agreement does not supersede UNCLOS obligations. The document also discusses the necessity of environmental impact assessments that account for cumulative and socio-economic impacts, and cautions against marine geoengineering that might transform pollution types.

The document analyzes the negotiation timelines of the Rotterdam, Minamata, and BBNJ agreements to demonstrate that international legal instruments often exceed their initial deadlines. It argues that the current process for the plastics treaty, governed by UNEA resolution 5/14, provides sufficient flexibility for the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC) to continue meetings beyond 2024 if necessary, as the resolution expresses an 'ambition' rather than a strict mandate for completion by that date.

The report argues that offshore carbon capture and storage (CCS) is an ineffective and risky strategy that prolongs fossil fuel dependence. It highlights that proposed 'hubs' in the Gulf of Mexico and North Sea face significant technical challenges, such as pressure management and leakage from legacy wells, while relying heavily on public subsidies. The document concludes that CCS often covers for expanded fossil fuel production and calls for a halt to these projects to protect marine ecosystems and accelerate a just energy transition.

The statement supports the Independent Expert's report on international solidarity, noting that environmental human rights defenders face increasing criminalization and scrutiny by States. It specifically highlights harassment of civil society and Indigenous Peoples' representatives at past UNFCCC COPs and expresses concern over the closed civic space in Azerbaijan ahead of COP29 in November 2024, calling for safe and inclusive participation.

The Center for International Environmental Law examines the "Insuring Our Future Act" (Assembly Bill A9905A/Senate Bill S9435) in New York. The bill targets the contradiction of insurance companies raising premiums due to climate-driven disasters while continuing to finance the fossil fuel industry. It proposes a five-year phase-out of fossil fuel investments and underwriting, alongside protections against "bluelining" and sudden non-renewals for policyholders.

The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) and Earthjustice advocate for state-mandated transparent ESG data disclosure to prevent greenwashing and human rights violations. They specifically criticize the use of carbon offsets by fossil fuel companies to justify the expansion of oil and gas production, arguing that such practices rearrange rather than reduce emissions and often violate human rights.

The report details the systemic impacts of plastic pollution on municipal infrastructure, public health, and ecosystems, asserting that a small number of petrochemical and FMCG companies knowingly exacerbated the crisis by promoting inadequate recycling solutions. It provides a guide for government attorneys to use nuisance, products liability, and consumer protection laws to hold these polluters accountable, drawing parallels to successful litigation against the tobacco and PCB industries.

Over 400 civil society organizations are calling on the Council of Europe to establish a binding legal framework for the right to a healthy environment. While 42 of the 46 Member States already protect this right via national laws or the Aarhus Convention, the European Convention on Human Rights lacks an explicit autonomous right. The authors argue that an additional protocol would provide legal clarity for the European Court of Human Rights, protect environmental defenders, and address the 'triple planetary crisis' of pollution, climate change, and biodiversity loss.

The letter urges states to phase out offshore oil and gas production to protect coastal and Indigenous communities, citing a UN report on fisheries and the right to food. It argues that these activities degrade marine biodiversity and threaten the food security of small-scale fishing communities, while contributing to global temperature rise.

The Center for International Environmental Law identifies a 'Dirty Dozen' of insurers that have restricted coverage for California homeowners, citing climate risks, while maintaining significant financial ties to fossil fuels. This practice is described as a 'vicious cycle of uninsurability' that shifts the economic burden of the climate crisis onto households.